Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. ROCKPro64 - USB3

ROCKPro64 - USB3

ROCKPro64
  • FrankMF

    Man liest ja immer viel über Probleme mit dem USB3-Port auf dem ROCKPro64. z.B. hier

    Nachdem ich heute mein NAS mal wieder ins Gehäuse eingebaut habe, habe ich ein wenig gespielt. Hier lag eine SanDisk Ultra 3D SSD mit 1TB rum, da die SD-Karte ziemlich voll war, bot es sich an diese SSD zum Rootdevice zu machen.

    Alles so gemacht, wie immer. Alles kopiert, SSD umbenannt in linux-root und neugestartet. So sieht das jetzt aus.

    rock64@rp64v_2_1_NAS:~$ df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev            978M     0  978M   0% /dev
tmpfs           198M  664K  198M   1% /run
/dev/sda        916G   63G  807G   8% /
tmpfs           990M     0  990M   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs           5,0M  4,0K  5,0M   1% /run/lock
tmpfs           990M     0  990M   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mmcblk0p6  112M  4,0K  112M   1% /boot/efi
tmpfs           198M     0  198M   0% /run/user/1000
/dev/md0        1,8T  723G 1018G  42% /mnt/raid

    Es gibt ein Raid, die SSD am USB3 die das Rootdevice darstellt. Diese Konstruktion hat den Vorteil, das man auch den Kernel updaten kann, weil das Bootdevice weiterhin auf der SD-Karte liegt. Aktuell läuft dieser Kernel.

    rock64@rp64v_2_1_NAS:~$ uname -a
Linux rp64v_2_1_NAS 5.0.0-1101-ayufan-g41eeb7cd789e #ayufan SMP PREEMPT Fri Mar 8 22:14:59 UTC 2019 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

    Ok, dann mal ein kleiner Test. Wir kopieren mal alle Star Wars Filme vom Haupt-NAS. Das NAS bilden zwei mechanische HDD's. Der Kopiervorgang erfolgt auf die an USB3 hängende SSD.

    rock64@rp64v_2_1_NAS:~$ scp -r root@192.168.3.243:/mnt/nas/Videos/"Star_Wars" /home/rock64/
root@192.168.3.243's password: 
Star_Wars_I.ts                       100% 6753MB  83.7MB/s   01:20    
Star_Wars_IV.ts                      100% 7668MB  83.5MB/s   01:31    
Star_Wars_VI.ts                      100% 7871MB  83.4MB/s   01:34    
Star_Wars_V.ts                       100% 7409MB  83.3MB/s   01:28    
Star_Wars_III.ts                     100% 7169MB  83.0MB/s   01:26    
Star_Wars_II.ts                      100% 6268MB  83.3MB/s   01:15

    Schwupps, alles da. Hätte ect. noch was schneller sein können, vermute aber das die mechanischen HDD's der Flaschenhals sind.

    So, kurz die SSD testen.

    rock64@rp64v_2_1_NAS:~$ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=sd.img bs=1M count=4096 conv=fdatasync
[sudo] password for rock64: 
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4,3 GB, 4,0 GiB) copied, 10,7109 s, 401 MB/s

    Der dmesg ist völlig sauber, keine Auffälligkeiten in Bezug auf den USB3-Port. Da @tkaiser öfter von "Undervoltage" schreibt, ich nutze an diesem NAS das Original Netzteil von Pine64 in der 5A Ausführung.

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0

  • FrankMF

    Images 0.9.x

    Images
    13
    0 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    764 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    0.9.16: gitlab-ci-linux-build-163 released

    0.9.x 0.9.16: Bump kernel to 4.4.197, 0.9.15: Bump kernel to 4.4.193, 0.9.14: Bump kernel to 4.4.190, 0.9.14: Fix Firefox video playback, 0.9.13: Bump sound volume for Pinebook Pro, 0.9.12: Fix LXDE for Rock64, 0.9.10: Fix support for power/standby LEDs for all boards,
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Reset & Power Taster (extern)

    Hardware
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    610 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro WLan Modul

    Verschoben ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    687 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    Benchmark Script

    ROCKPro64
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    578 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mainline

    Mein gekürztes Ergebnis auf einem ROCKPro64 v2.0 mit 4GB RAM und 4.18er Kernel, dieser ROCK benutzt eine SD-Karte!

    Gekürzt

    Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS Release: 18.04 Codename: bionic Architecture: arm64 Uptime: 16:14:56 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01 Linux 4.18.0-rc5-1048-ayufan-g69e417fe38cf (rockpro64) 07/27/18 _aarch64_ (6 CPU) avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0.54 0.00 0.74 0.39 0.00 98.33 Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn mmcblk0 20.63 634.58 48.26 168380 12804 nvme0n1 0.14 4.01 0.00 1064 0 total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 3.8G 241M 3.4G 19M 201M 3.5G Swap: 0B 0B 0B ##########################################################################

    Komplett -> http://ix.io/1ix7

  • FrankMF

    Image 0.7.8 - Latest release

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    536 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - kein WLan-Modul möglich?

    ROCKPro64
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Heute, 5 Monate später, kann ich bestätigen das WLan möglich ist 🙂 Getestet auf einem ROCKPro64 v2.1 mit 2GB RAM.

    Eine Vorabversion von Recalbox machte es das erste Mal für mich möglich das WLan zu benutzen. Bericht

    Und PCIe ist abgeschaltet im dts File.

    pcie-phy { compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pcie-phy"; #phy-cells = <0x0>; rockchip,grf = <0x15>; clocks = <0x8 0x8a>; clock-names = "refclk"; resets = <0x8 0x87>; reset-names = "phy"; status = "disabled"; phandle = <0x8b>; }; pcie@f8000000 { compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pcie"; #address-cells = <0x3>; #size-cells = <0x2>; aspm-no-l0s; clocks = <0x8 0xc5 0x8 0xc4 0x8 0x147 0x8 0xa0>; clock-names = "aclk", "aclk-perf", "hclk", "pm"; bus-range = <0x0 0x1f>; max-link-speed = <0x2>; linux,pci-domain = <0x0>; msi-map = <0x0 0x89 0x0 0x1000>; interrupts = <0x0 0x31 0x4 0x0 0x0 0x32 0x4 0x0 0x0 0x33 0x4 0x0>; interrupt-names = "sys", "legacy", "client"; #interrupt-cells = <0x1>; interrupt-map-mask = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x7>; interrupt-map = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1 0x8a 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x2 0x8a 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x3 0x8a 0x2 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x4 0x8a 0x3>; phys = <0x8b>; phy-names = "pcie-phy"; ranges = <0x83000000 0x0 0xfa000000 0x0 0xfa000000 0x0 0x1e00000 0x81000000 0x0 0xfbe00000 0x0 0xfbe00000 0x0 0x100000>; reg = <0x0 0xf8000000 0x0 0x2000000 0x0 0xfd000000 0x0 0x1000000>; reg-names = "axi-base", "apb-base"; resets = <0x8 0x82 0x8 0x83 0x8 0x84 0x8 0x85 0x8 0x86 0x8 0x81 0x8 0x80>; reset-names = "core", "mgmt", "mgmt-sticky", "pipe", "pm", "pclk", "aclk"; status = "disabled";

    Also bleibt weiterhin ungeklärt, ob auch beides zusammen möglich ist. Also gleichzeitig das WLan-Modul und eine PCIe Karte.

  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    981 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann.

    rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • FrankMF

    Interessante Links

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    620 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet