Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Images
  5. Linux
  6. stretch-minimal-rockpro64

stretch-minimal-rockpro64

Verschoben Linux
  • FrankMF

    INFO'S

    ANWENDUNG

    Das Image auf eine SD-Karte schreiben, den ROCKPro64 damit starten.

    Status

    Startet nicht - Fehler!

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    Mit 0.7.2 startet das Image. LAN ok.

    rock64@rockpro64:~$ iperf3 -c 192.168.3.213
Connecting to host 192.168.3.213, port 5201
[  4] local 192.168.3.9 port 33558 connected to 192.168.3.213 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   116 MBytes   970 Mbits/sec    0    938 KBytes       
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   942 Mbits/sec    0   1012 KBytes       
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec   112 MBytes   942 Mbits/sec    0   1.00 MBytes       
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec    0   1.11 MBytes       
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec    0   1.11 MBytes       
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec    0   1.11 MBytes       
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec   106 MBytes   890 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec   113 MBytes   952 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes   942 Mbits/sec    0   6.01 MBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.09 GBytes   940 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  1.09 GBytes   937 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.
rock64@rockpro64:~$ iperf3 -s              
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.3.213, port 51756
[  5] local 192.168.3.9 port 5201 connected to 192.168.3.213 port 51758
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   110 MBytes   923 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   112 MBytes   942 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   112 MBytes   942 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   112 MBytes   941 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes   942 Mbits/sec                  
[  5]  10.00-10.02  sec  1.79 MBytes   931 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  5]   0.00-10.02  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec                  sender
[  5]   0.00-10.02  sec  1.10 GBytes   940 Mbits/sec                  receiver
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201
-----------------------------------------------------------
^Ciperf3: interrupt - the server has terminated

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann.

    rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)

==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests                                               ==
==                                                                      ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes                                          ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be          ==
==         copied per second (adding together read and writen           ==
==         bytes would have provided twice higher numbers)              ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
==         to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the   ==
==         destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination)    ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in    ==
==         brackets                                                     ==
==========================================================================

 C copy backwards                                     :   2812.7 MB/s
 C copy backwards (32 byte blocks)                    :   2811.9 MB/s
 C copy backwards (64 byte blocks)                    :   2632.8 MB/s
 C copy                                               :   2667.2 MB/s
 C copy prefetched (32 bytes step)                    :   2633.5 MB/s
 C copy prefetched (64 bytes step)                    :   2640.8 MB/s
 C 2-pass copy                                        :   2509.8 MB/s
 C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step)             :   2431.6 MB/s
 C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step)             :   2424.1 MB/s
 C fill                                               :   4887.7 MB/s (0.5%)
 C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks)               :   4883.0 MB/s
 C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks)               :   4889.3 MB/s
 C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks)               :   4889.2 MB/s
 ---
 standard memcpy                                      :   2807.3 MB/s
 standard memset                                      :   4890.4 MB/s (0.3%)
 ---
 NEON LDP/STP copy                                    :   2803.7 MB/s
 NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step)          :   2802.1 MB/s
 NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step)          :   2800.7 MB/s
 NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step)          :   2745.5 MB/s
 NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step)          :   2745.8 MB/s
 NEON LD1/ST1 copy                                    :   2801.9 MB/s
 NEON STP fill                                        :   4888.9 MB/s (0.3%)
 NEON STNP fill                                       :   4850.1 MB/s
 ARM LDP/STP copy                                     :   2803.8 MB/s
 ARM STP fill                                         :   4893.0 MB/s (0.5%)
 ARM STNP fill                                        :   4851.7 MB/s

==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests.                                              ==
==                                                                      ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled.       ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much       ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of      ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory.                ==
==                                                                      ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory,         ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover,    ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes.       ==
==                                                                      ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer    ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall    ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX     ==
== uses this trick.                                                     ==
==========================================================================

 NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer)                 :    602.5 MB/s
 NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer)          :    551.6 MB/s
 NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer)                 :    667.1 MB/s
 NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer)          :    605.6 MB/s
 ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer)                  :    445.3 MB/s
 ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer)           :    428.8 MB/s

==========================================================================
== Memory latency test                                                  ==
==                                                                      ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers   ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant   ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM      ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see   ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every      ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest).                                         ==
==                                                                      ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to  ==
==         be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
==         latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
==         two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if    ==
==         the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding       ==
==         requests, dual random read has the same timings as two       ==
==         single reads performed one after another.                    ==
==========================================================================

block size : single random read / dual random read
      1024 :    0.0 ns          /     0.0 ns 
      2048 :    0.0 ns          /     0.0 ns 
      4096 :    0.0 ns          /     0.0 ns 
      8192 :    0.0 ns          /     0.0 ns 
     16384 :    0.0 ns          /     0.0 ns 
     32768 :    0.0 ns          /     0.0 ns 
     65536 :    4.5 ns          /     7.2 ns 
    131072 :    6.8 ns          /     9.7 ns 
    262144 :    9.8 ns          /    12.8 ns 
    524288 :   11.4 ns          /    14.7 ns 
   1048576 :   16.0 ns          /    22.6 ns 
   2097152 :  114.0 ns          /   175.3 ns 
   4194304 :  161.7 ns          /   219.9 ns 
   8388608 :  190.7 ns          /   241.5 ns 
  16777216 :  205.3 ns          /   250.5 ns 
  33554432 :  212.9 ns          /   255.5 ns 
  67108864 :  222.3 ns          /   271.1 ns

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0

  • FrankMF

    WLan auf der Konsole einrichten

    Angeheftet Linux
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    583 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Ich kann im Manjaro keine WPA3 Sicherheit auswählen, dann bekomme ich keine Verbindung. Es geht nur WPA2 Personal. Gegenstelle ist eine FRITZ!Box 6591 Cable.

    2021-11-28_16-37.png

    In der Fritzbox sieht das so aus

    50d23aa8-5f67-485e-a994-244ef4f6a270-image.png

    Das kam als Fehlermeldung

    Nov 28 11:03:07 frank-pc wpa_supplicant[700]: wlan0: Trying to associate with SSID 'FRITZ!Box 6591 Cable AK' Nov 28 11:03:07 frank-pc wpa_supplicant[700]: wlan0: WPA: Failed to select authenticated key management type Nov 28 11:03:07 frank-pc wpa_supplicant[700]: wlan0: WPA: Failed to set WPA key management and encryption suites

    Ich denke, der Treiber unterstützt das nicht.

  • FrankMF

    TwisterOS

    Images
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    243 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - RTL8111/8168/8411 Netzwerkkarte

    Hardware
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    389 Aufrufe
    K

    na denn, tippe ich mal so auf default konfiguriert per dhcp 🙂

  • FrankMF

    SATA Karte Marvell 88SE9230 Chipsatz

    Angeheftet Hardware
    19
    0 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Ok, es gibt noch eine andere Möglichkeit.

    Kamil hat mir noch ein wenig geholfen. Mit folgender Änderung werden die Platten gefunden.

    hmm, I had to add /etc/default/extlinux: libahci.skip_host_reset=1

    Sieht dann so aus.

    # Configure timeout to choose the kernel # TIMEOUT="10" # Configure default kernel to boot: check all kernels in `/boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf` # DEFAULT="kernel-4.4.126-rockchip-ayufan-253" # Configure additional kernel configuration options APPEND="$APPEND root=LABEL=linux-root rootwait rootfstype=ext4 libahci.skip_host_reset=1"

    Danach waren die Platten zu sehen.

    root@rockpro64:/tmp/etc/default# blkid /dev/sda2: SEC_TYPE="msdos" LABEL_FATBOOT="boot-efi" LABEL="boot-efi" UUID="ABCD-FC7D" TYPE="vfat" PARTLABEL="boot_efi" PARTUUID="72e36967-4050-4bb3-8f8f-bf6755c38f28" /dev/sda3: LABEL="linux-boot" UUID="8e289a3e-0f9b-4da1-a147-51e03390637c" TYPE="ext4" PARTLABEL="linux_boot" PARTUUID="fe944fd2-3e42-4202-8a95-656e9bdb4be6" /dev/sda4: LABEL="linux-root" UUID="3e9513c6-dfd1-48c9-bee2-04bb5a153056" TYPE="ext4" PARTLABEL="linux_root" PARTUUID="d2d1dd88-030d-4f74-998f-7c9ce7d385d0" /dev/sdb2: SEC_TYPE="msdos" LABEL_FATBOOT="boot-efi" LABEL="boot-efi" UUID="56C9-F745" TYPE="vfat" PARTLABEL="boot_efi" PARTUUID="919c8f73-5f25-4a01-9072-3a5ed9a88ff2" /dev/sdb3: LABEL="linux-boot" UUID="23c19647-f4a1-4197-a877-f1bb03456bef" TYPE="ext4" PARTLABEL="linux_boot" PARTUUID="093d0cc0-d122-4dce-aeb5-4e266b4b7d9d" /dev/sdb4: LABEL="linux-root" UUID="f1c74331-8318-4ee8-a4f7-f0c169fb9944" TYPE="ext4" PARTLABEL="linux_root" PARTUUID="964ab457-58d5-40c4-bb02-dfd37bd2f0da" /dev/sda1: PARTLABEL="loader1" PARTUUID="37466429-e4a4-495c-b9a1-3f74625a3cae" /dev/sdb1: PARTLABEL="loader1" PARTUUID="33f692b3-54cb-4a37-b602-21a2baf32fa0"

    Aber auch hiermit ist ein Boot von der SATA Platte nicht möglich.

    Ich möchte hier noch was vom kamil zitieren.

    (11:44:09) ayufanWithPM: will look later, but this controller is tricky, also on x86 as well
    (11:44:16) ayufanWithPM: jms585 seems to be significantly more stable

    Evt. bekommt er das gefixt 😉

  • FrankMF

    Image 0.7.8 - Latest release

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    543 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    OMV Images

    ROCKPro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    870 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Kurzes Update

    https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/linux-build/releases/download/0.8.0rc10/stretch-openmediavault-rockpro64-0.8.0rc10-1125-armhf.img.xz

    Startet 🙂 Incl. WiFi & PCIe NVMe SSD

    War aber nur ein ganz kurzer Test!!

  • FrankMF

    zram - Was das??

    ROCKPro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    923 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    @tkaiser ; Ich hab dich vermisst 😂

    Danke für die Info, ich bin vor dem ROCKPro64 da noch nie so richtig drüber gestolpert. Aber wenn ich dann was finde, schau auch immer wofür es denn bitte ist.

    Danke für Deine Hinweise.

  • FrankMF

    Links

    Angeheftet Linux
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    770 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet