Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Hardware
  5. ROCKPro64 - Reset & Power Taster (extern)

ROCKPro64 - Reset & Power Taster (extern)

Hardware
  • FrankMF

    0_1536004071267_DSC_0036_res_power.JPG

    Wenn sich mal jemand fragen sollte, für was die sind!? Damit kann man den Reset und Power Button nach extern verlegen. Also, Drähte dran und Taster in einem Gehäuse z.B. benutzen.

    Der Chef von pine64.org schrieb dazu

    the REC should be "RES" and sorry on the typo. "PWR" is Power On Switch and "REC" is Reset Switch.

    und

    The four pins is the mirror to the reset and power on switches and allows developers, especially casing that has its own power and reset buttons to derive out these two signals. Original plan to put a connector there but worry about block with PCIe card. you may ask where put the connector on this place that knowing may block PCIe card, the answer is layout engineer already runs out of idea on the suitable place.

    Quelle: http://irc.pine64.uk

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • FrankMF

    Mainline 5.13.x

    Images
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    208 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    OpenWrt

    Images
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    186 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 Übersicht - was geht?

    ROCKPro64
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    627 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    WIFI Seit dem Release des Images 0.7.13 ist WiFi auch möglich. Weiterhin ungelöst ist das Problem PCIe & WiFi (also bei mir).
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Armbian armbian-config

    Verschoben Armbian
    1
    3
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    769 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    [HOWTO] Verschlüsseltes NAS aufsetzen

    Verschoben ROCKPro64
    12
    0 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Da btrfs bei mir ja nicht so der Bringer war, Fehler im Image vom Kamil?, Fehler in btrfs? Ich weiß es nicht, also weg damit! Da ich das NAS noch richtig produktiv genutzt hatte, waren die Daten schnell gesichert. Danach das NAS neugestartet, nun sind die beiden Platten nicht mehr gemountet und wir können damit arbeiten. ACHTUNG! Ich bitte wie immer darum, das Gehirn ab hier einzuschalten! Sonst droht Datenverlust! Aus Sicherheitsgründen gebe ich hier die Laufwerke so an = sdX1 Das X bitte entsprechend austauschen! Die beiden Platten mit sudo fdisk /dev/sdX neu einrichten. Alte Partition weg, neu einrichten usw. Im Detail gehe ich hier jetzt nicht drauf ein. Ich gehe davon aus, das das bekannt ist. Der Plan raid_pool0 = sdX1 = /dev/mapper/raid_pool0 raid_pool1 = sdX1 = /dev/mapper/raid_pool1 Verschlüsseln sudo cryptsetup --key-size 512 --hash sha256 --iter-time 5000 --use-random luksFormat /dev/sdX1 sudo cryptsetup --key-size 512 --hash sha256 --iter-time 5000 --use-random luksFormat /dev/sdX1 Platten entschlüsseln sudo cryptsetup open /dev/sdX1 raid_pool0 sudo cryptsetup open /dev/sdX1 raid_pool1 RAID1 anlegen sudo mdadm --create /dev/md0 --auto md --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/mapper/raid_pool0 /dev/mapper/raid_pool1 sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/md0 Script zum Entschlüsseln und Mounten crypt.sh #!/bin/bash ###############################################################################$ # Autor: Frank Mankel # Verschlüsseltes Raid1 einbinden! # # Hardware: # ROCKPro64v2.1 # PCIe SATA Karte # 2St. 2,5 Zoll HDD Platten a 2TB # # Software: # bionic-minimal 0.7.9 # Kontakt: frank.mankel@gmail.com # ###############################################################################$ #Passwort abfragen echo "Passwort eingeben!" read -s password echo "Bitte warten......" #Passwörter abfragen echo -n $password | cryptsetup open /dev/sdX1 raid_pool0 -d - echo -n $password | cryptsetup open /dev/sdX1 raid_pool1 -d - #Raid1 mounten mount /dev/md0 /mnt/raid echo "Laufwerke erfolgreich gemountet!" Bis jetzt sieht das Raid ok aus, ich werde das die nächsten Tage mal ein wenig im Auge behalten. [ 82.430293] device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3 [ 82.430430] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.39.0-ioctl (2018-04-03) initialised: dm-devel@redhat.com [ 108.196397] md/raid1:md0: not clean -- starting background reconstruction [ 108.196401] md/raid1:md0: active with 2 out of 2 mirrors [ 108.240395] md0: detected capacity change from 0 to 2000260497408 [ 110.076860] md: resync of RAID array md0 [ 110.385099] EXT4-fs (md0): recovery complete [ 110.431715] EXT4-fs (md0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) [57744.301662] md: md0: resync done.
  • FrankMF

    Zwischenfazit August 2018

    ROCKPro64
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann. rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • FrankMF

    Erste Lebenszeichen

    ROCKPro64
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    508 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet