Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Images
  5. Kernel 4.4.x

Kernel 4.4.x

Angeheftet Images
45 1 4.6k
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • FrankMF

    [V] RockPro64 V2.1

    Frank's Resterampe rockpro64 verkauf
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    152 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    TwisterOS

    Images twisteros armbian rockpro64
    1
    3
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    284 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    Unterstützung Lüfter

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mit dem neuen Release hatte jemand das mal ausprobiert -> https://forum.frank-mankel.org/topic/795/fan-control-omv-auyfan-0-10-12-gitlab-ci-linux-build-184-kernel-5-6/6 Dieser Kernel kam zur Anwendung Linux rockpro64 5.6.0-1137-ayufan-ge57f05e7bf8f #ayufan SMP Wed Apr 15 10:16:02 UTC 2020 aarch64 GNU/Linux Dort stellt man dann fest, das sich eine Kleinigkeit geändert hat. Der Pfad und der Dateiname hat sich geändert. Kontrollieren kann man das mit nano /sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon3/pwm1 Der Wert geht von 0 - 255, wie gehabt.
  • FrankMF

    Benchmark Script

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    660 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mainline Mein gekürztes Ergebnis auf einem ROCKPro64 v2.0 mit 4GB RAM und 4.18er Kernel, dieser ROCK benutzt eine SD-Karte! Gekürzt Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS Release: 18.04 Codename: bionic Architecture: arm64 Uptime: 16:14:56 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01 Linux 4.18.0-rc5-1048-ayufan-g69e417fe38cf (rockpro64) 07/27/18 _aarch64_ (6 CPU) avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0.54 0.00 0.74 0.39 0.00 98.33 Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn mmcblk0 20.63 634.58 48.26 168380 12804 nvme0n1 0.14 4.01 0.00 1064 0 total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 3.8G 241M 3.4G 19M 201M 3.5G Swap: 0B 0B 0B ########################################################################## Komplett -> http://ix.io/1ix7
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 updaten

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    614 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    Mainline Commits

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    759 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal diesen alten Thread wieder ausgraben. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC support along with the HiSilicon Hi3670, many NVIDIA Tegra improvements, GTA04A5 phone support, and more. There is also now mainline ARM SBC support for the Orange Pi Zero Plus2, Orange Pi One Plus, Pine64 LTS, Banana Pi M2+ H5, 64-bit Banana Pi M2+ H3, ASUS Tinker Board S, RockPro64, Rock960, and ROC-RK-3399-PC. Quelle: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-420-features&num=1 Im Pine64 Forum gefunden.
  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann. rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Platinenerkundung

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    12
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    633 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet