Skip to content

TwisterOS

Images
1 1 284
  • Vor ein paar Tagen, bin ich im Pine64 Forum über ein neues Image gestolpert. Es nennt sich TwisterOS und basiert auf einem Armbian Focal Image. Als Oberfläche wird der Xfce Desktop benutzt.

    Wie viele wissen, nutze ich den ROCKPro64 eigentlich nur als Headless Server, aber von Zeit zu Zeit schaue ich auch gerne mal was sich so getan hat. Dieses OS hat ein paar interessante Eigenschaften.

    • Latest Panfrost GPU drivers with desktop hardware acceleration
    • OpenGL 3.1 is also supported with fully updated Mesa 21.1.0
    • Kodi and MPV media players with built-in hardware acceleration support

    Das sollte einen Desktop versprechen, der endlich mal flüssig läuft. Ein paar kurze Tests von mir zeigt das zu bestätigen.

    Ich denke, wer gerne einen Desktop mit dem ROCKPro64 nutzen möchte, hat mit diesem OS endlich mal was, wo sich die Zeit lohnt 🙂

    Zum Schluss ein paar Screenshots

    Screenshot_2021-02-14_08-02-23.png

    Screenshot_2021-02-14_08-03-13.png

    Screenshot_2021-02-14_08-04-14.png

  • NanoPi R4S - Armbian

    NanoPi R4S armbian linux nanopir4s
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    420 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Müsste seit gestern so weit sein [image: 1612720791407-b20f93d2-1719-40c5-afb8-6b4edafa6793-image.png]
  • ROCKPro64 - Kernel 5.3.0-rc4-1117 angetestet!

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    408 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • ROCKPro64 - DKMS im Release RC12 möglich

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    294 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Tehuti Networks Ltd. TN9710P 10GBase-T/NBASE-T Ethernet Adapter

    Hardware hardware rockpro64
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    This repo contains the tn40xx Linux driver for 10Gbit NICs based on the TN4010 MAC from Tehuti Networks. This driver enables the following 10Gb SFP+ NICs: D-Link DXE-810S Edimax EN-9320SFP+ StarTech PEX10000SFP Synology E10G15-F1 ... as well as the following 10GBase-T/NBASE-T NICs: D-Link DXE-810T Edimax EN-9320TX-E EXSYS EX-6061-2 Intellinet 507950 StarTech ST10GSPEXNB Quelle: https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/tn40xx-driver/tree/master
  • Mainline Kernel 4.20.x

    Verschoben Images rockpro64
    26
    0 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    4.20.0-1090-ayufan released Änderungen -> https://gitlab.com/ayufan-repos/rock64/linux-mainline-kernel/commits/master
  • ROCKPro64 wieder vorbestellbar

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Meine Lieferung ist unterwegs Hello Mr. Frank Mankel, Order 62068 just shipped on July 18, 2018 from Shenzhen transit to Hong Kong DHL.
  • stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann. rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • Images 0.6.x

    Verschoben Images rockpro64
    30
    0 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    7k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    0.6.60 released 0.6.60: Fix pcie/nvme/sata support for 4.4, 0.6.60: Fix spi-flash access for 4.4/mainline, Ich bin davon ausgegangen, das 0.6.x nict mehr fortgeführt wird, okay - sieht nicht so aus. Sollte released werden, ist aber aus irgendeinem Grund gestern nicht passiert (lt. Kamil)