linux-nerds.org

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

ROCKPro64 updaten

ROCKPro64

1 Beiträge 1 Kommentatoren 578 Aufrufe

F Offline
F Offline
FrankM
schrieb am zuletzt editiert von FrankM

#1
Kamil veröffentlicht ja auf github seine Images.

Für die Einsteiger, wenn man nun neue Images baut und sich sicher ist, das was nicht richtig funktioniert, deklariert man diese als
```
 Pre-Release
```
Wenn ein Image richtig gut läuft, es nur gutes Feedback der Tester gibt, dann nennt man dieses Image
```
Latest release
```
Was soll das? Anwender, die Wert auf Stabilität legen, werden nicht von den ganzen Testimages belästigt Solche Anwender bekommen dann bei einem Update nur Latest releases ausgeliefert. Will man nun auch Pre-Releases installieren, muss man die Datei /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ayufan-rock64.list editieren.
```
deb http://deb.ayufan.eu/orgs/ayufan-rock64/releases /

# uncomment to use pre-release kernels and compatibility packages
deb http://deb.ayufan.eu/orgs/ayufan-rock64/pre-releases /
```
Danach führt man dann ein
```
sudo apt-get update -y
```
durch. Dadurch werden jetzt die Pre-Release Quellen mit eingebunden.

Mit einem
```
 sudo apt-get install linux-rockpro64 -y
```
wird dann das aktuellste Pre-Release installiert.
```
sudo shutdown -r now
```
Danach ist der ROCKPro64 auf der aktuellsten Version.
Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social
1. NanoPi R5S
2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
4. RockPro64 v2.1
1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
0

F

ROCKPro64 - Debian 10.1
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben ROCKPro64 rockpro64
1

0 Stimmen

1 Beiträge

400 Aufrufe

Niemand hat geantwortet
F

Mainline 5.3.x
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Images rockpro64
3

0 Stimmen

3 Beiträge

398 Aufrufe

F

5.3.0-1119-ayufan released
ayufan: defconfig: enable DRM_PANFROST/DRM_LIMA
F

ROCKPro64 - i2c Bus
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Hardware rockpro64
1

0 Stimmen

1 Beiträge

535 Aufrufe

Niemand hat geantwortet
F

Kamil's 4.20.x
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben ROCKPro64 rockpro64
1

0 Stimmen

1 Beiträge

647 Aufrufe

Niemand hat geantwortet
F

ROCKPro64 - USB-OTG funktioniert!
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben ROCKPro64 rockpro64
1

0 Stimmen

1 Beiträge

537 Aufrufe

Niemand hat geantwortet
F

ROCKPro64 - Stromverbrauch
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Hardware hardware rockpro64
1

0 Stimmen

1 Beiträge

794 Aufrufe

Niemand hat geantwortet
F

Die ersten Schritte nach der Installation!
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben ROCKPro64 howto rockpro64
1

0 Stimmen

1 Beiträge

1k Aufrufe

Niemand hat geantwortet
F

stretch-minimal-rockpro64
Beobachtet Ignoriert Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Linux rockpro64
3

0 Stimmen

3 Beiträge

1k Aufrufe

F

Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann.
rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns