Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Images
  5. Images 0.10.x

Images 0.10.x

Angeheftet Images
10 1 599
  • FrankMF

    0.10.2: gitlab-ci-linux-build-170 released

    HIGHLY EXPERIMENTAL AND NOT WORKING!!!
    THIS RELEASE HAS BROKEN BOOT

    Quelle: https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/linux-build/releases/

    Nein, man kann noch nichts nutzen! 🙂

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.3: gitlab-ci-linux-build-171 released

    • HIGHLY EXPERIMENTAL AND NOT WORKING!!!

    • PRE-RELEASE: unstable and should be only used for testing purposes

      • 0.10.3: Hopefully OMV will compile,
      • 0.10.3: ADd SPI boot on RockPro64
      • 0.10.3: Add NVME/SATA boot on RockPro64
      • 0.10.2: Update partition scheme to use /boot/efi, /boot and /
      • 0.10.2: Configure /etc/fstab with all partitions
      • 0.10.2: Compile buster/containers instead of focal/containers

    Das sollte jetzt auch auf einigen Geräten booten. Aber heute wird nichts mehr getestet - Feierabend! 🙂

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.6: gitlab-ci-linux-build-174 released

    • 0.10.6: Maybe build OMV5
    • 0.10.6: Use u-boot instead of u-boot-rockchip
    • 0.10.6: Fix focal/armhf build
    • 0.10.5: Revert systemd-networkd change
    • 0.10.5: Maybe support USB3 boot on Rock64
    • 0.10.5: Maybe build OMV5

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.7: gitlab-ci-linux-build-175 released

    • 0.10.7: Maybe Pinebook Pro will work, thanks Manjaro 🙂
    • 0.10.7: Maybe Desktop will boot
    • 0.10.7: Maybe OMV5 will run
    • 0.10.7: Maybe gl4es will work

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.7 ist im Moment nicht funktional. Nach dem Boot ist keine eth0 Schnittstelle vorhanden.

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.8: gitlab-ci-linux-build-177 released

    • 0.10.8: Make rootfs sticky
    • 0.10.8: Update sizes of images
    • 0.10.8: Enable by default C.UTF-8 and en_US.UTF-8 and use dpkg-reconfigure locales
    • 0.10.8: Run update-command-not-found
    • 0.10.8: Better handle /etc/resolv.conf (do not remove it, if it become system controlled)
    • 0.10.8: Load dptx.alt.bin to make it possible to ship also on buster

    Viele neue Images

    • Ubuntu Focal LXDE
    • Ubuntu Focal Mate
    • Ubuntu Focal Minimum
    • Debian Buster OMV

    Viele Sachen zum Testen 🙂

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.9 - 0.10.9: gitlab-ci-linux-build-180 released

    • 0.10.9: Shrink created images to reduce write time
    • 0.10.9: Enable work/diy LEDs on boot for RockPro64/PinebookPro
    • 0.10.9: Fix excessive log messages on OMV5
    • 0.10.8: Make rootfs sticky
    • 0.10.8: Update sizes of images

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.10: gitlab-ci-linux-build-181 released

    • 0.10.10: Do not compile OMV5 for armhf, only arm64
    • 0.10.10: Fix fstab issue introduced in 0.10.9
    • 0.10.10: Do more cleanups during image creation to reduce size
    • 0.10.10: Enable u-boot HDMI output for RockPro64
    • 0.10.10: Support HDMI modeline with pclck 32MHz (ie. 1024x600@43)
    • 0.10.10: Support automated resize when booting from nvme

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.11: gitlab-ci-linux-build-183 released

    • 0.10.11: Support wifi/bt on Pinebook Pro
    • 0.10.11: Add install_kernel script
    • 0.10.11: Fix support for rockchip/dptx.bin
    • 0.10.11: Try Gnome, KDE, XFCE4 additionally to LXDE, Mate

    Neue Desktops werden auf Basis von Ubuntu Focal unterstützt.

    • KDE
    • XFCE4
    • Gnome

    Mal gespannt, was davon rund läuft 😉 Kann leider jetzt nichts testen, meine Testmaschine ist mit einem Raid Resync beschäftigt. OK, dann die Tage..

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
  • FrankMF

    0.10.12: gitlab-ci-linux-build-184 released

    • 0.10.12: Be strict on any qemu failures
    • 0.10.12: Build by default mate/lxde/gnome/xfce4
    • 0.10.12: Add pcie scan delay from @nuumio
    • 0.10.12: Add ubuntu-mate-lightdm-theme where possible

    Ich komme gar nicht mehr mit dem Testen hinterher 🙂

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • FrankMF

    SATA - Booten jetzt möglich

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    290 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Kernel 5.3.0-rc4-1117 angetestet!

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    410 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Armbian Desktop Variante

    Verschoben Armbian armbian rockpro64
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    542 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    Neues Script "change-default-kernel.sh "

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    628 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Docker Image

    ROCKPro64 docker rockpro64
    4
    1
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Das ganze hat einen furchtbar schönen Vorteil. Mal angenommen, ich habe ein NodeBB-Forum in einem Container laufen. Will das Ding updaten und das crasht einfach mal so. Egal, Container stoppen, Container starten und alles läuft wieder. Mit dem Commit sichere ich mir dann den Zustand nachdem ich weiß, das alles klappt
  • FrankMF

    SPI funktioniert

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    965 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Wie ich jetzt mehrmals festgestellt habe, ist das System von der USB3 Platte instabil. [111985.654653] EXT4-fs error (d4: inode #16354: comm systemd: r[111985.837719] EXT4-fs error Das killt dann das komplette System. Ob das an meiner Hardware liegt, weiß ich nicht. Also, wer da draußen so ein System einsetzen will, Vorsicht! Die USB3-Schnittstelle scheint noch einige Bugs zu haben!! Mein NVMe System dagegen ist absolut stabil!
  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann. rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - PCIe x4

    Verschoben Hardware hardware rockpro64
    13
    6
    0 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    5k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    @Northstar Hallo, laut meinen Info's nicht, hat irgendwas mit der Speicheradressierung zu tuen. Und Grafikkarten benötigen wohl zu viel. Das ist das, was ich bei den vielen Diskussionen im IRC so aufgeschnappt habe. Ich habe es auch schon mal genauso probiert - natürlich ohne Erfolg.