Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Eure Meinung zum ROCKPro64 ?

Eure Meinung zum ROCKPro64 ?

ROCKPro64
  • FrankMF

    Mich würde mal Eure Meinung zum ROCKPro64 interessieren und was ihr damit machen wollt?

    Hier mal was ich damit vorhabe.

    Projekt 1

    Mein 4GB ROCKPro64 soll als Webserver funktionieren.

    Software

    • nginx
    • mariadb
    • nodejs
    • nodebb
    • redis usw.

    Dient zum Testen meiner Webseiten und zum Ausprobieren neuer Sachen.

    Hardware

    • ROCKPro64 4GB
    • PCIe-NVMe Karte
    • NVMe SSD (als System)
    • SD-Karte (im Moment zum Booten)
    • evt. kommt noch eine USB-3 HDD als Datengrab dran.

    Projekt 2

    Mein 2GB ROCKPro64 soll als NAS funktionieren.

    Software

    • NFS Server
    • Restic

    Soll evt. mein bestehendes NAS ablösen.

    Hardware

    • ROCKPro64 2GB
    • PCIe-SATA Karte
    • zwei HDD (als Datengrab)
    • eMMC-Karte (System)

    So mal im Groben, das was ich vorhabe. Aber, bei mir kann sich so was relativ schnell ändern. Spielkind halt 😉

    Im Moment dienen beide ROCKPro64 als Testsysteme um Kamil's Images auf Herz und Nieren zu prüfen. Unsere Systeme sollen ja in Zukunft absolut stabil laufen 🙂

    Im Fediverse -> @FrankM@nrw.social

    1. NanoPi R5S
    2. Quartz64 Model B, 4GB RAM
    3. Quartz64 Model A, 4GB RAM
    4. RockPro64 v2.1
    0

  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Anpassen resize_rootfs.sh

    Angeheftet ROCKPro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    465 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Seit Release 0.10.10 ist das automatische Vergrößern der Root Partition mit drin 🙂

    0.10.10: Support automated resize when booting from nvme

    Einfach das Image auf die NVMe SSD schreiben, ab in den ROCKPro64 und fertig! Nach dem Booten wird die Partition dann automatisch auf die maximal mögliche Größe erweitert.

    Kamil hat das Script auch ein wenig angepasst.

    case $dev in /dev/mmcblk?p?) DISK=${dev:0:12} PART=${dev:13} NAME="sd/emmc" ;; /dev/sd??) DISK=${dev:0:8} PART=${dev:8} NAME="hdd/ssd" ;; /dev/nvme?n?p?) DISK=${dev:0:12} PART=${dev:13} NAME="pcie/nvme" ;;

    Das Resultat bei einer Samsung 979 EVO mit 500GB Speicher

    rock64@rockpro64:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 918M 0 918M 0% /dev tmpfs 192M 5.2M 187M 3% /run /dev/nvme0n1p4 459G 1.2G 439G 1% / tmpfs 957M 0 957M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock tmpfs 957M 0 957M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/nvme0n1p3 229M 44M 169M 21% /boot /dev/nvme0n1p2 12M 0 12M 0% /boot/efi tmpfs 192M 0 192M 0% /run/user/1000

    Perfekt. Danke Kamil!

  • FrankMF

    Recover Button

    Hardware
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    834 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Ich hab das mal ausprobiert.

    Den Recover Button so lange drücken, bis folgendes erscheint.

    In: serial@ff1a0000 Out: serial@ff1a0000 Err: serial@ff1a0000 Model: Pine64 RockPro64 rockchip_dnl_mode = 1 mode rockchip_dnl_mode = 2 mode rockchip_dnl_mode = 3 mode rockchip_dnl_mode = 4 mode entering maskrom mode...

    RKFlashTool clonen

    root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test# git clone https://github.com/rockchip-linux/rkflashtool Klone nach 'rkflashtool' ... remote: Counting objects: 663, done. remote: Total 663 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 663 Empfange Objekte: 100% (663/663), 114.94 KiB | 0 bytes/s, Fertig. Löse Unterschiede auf: 100% (367/367), Fertig.

    In das Verzeichnis wechseln

    root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test# cd rkflashtool/

    Inhalt

    root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# ls doc Makefile rkcrc.h rkflashtool.h rkparametersblock examples README rkflashall rkmisc rkunpack.c fixversion.sh release.sh rkflashloader rkpad rkunsign flashuboot rkcrc.c rkflashtool.c rkparameters version.h

    RKFlashtool bauen

    root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# make gcc -O2 -W -Wall -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 rkflashtool.c -o rkflashtool -lusb-1.0 gcc -O2 -W -Wall -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 rkcrc.c -o rkcrc -lusb-1.0 gcc -O2 -W -Wall -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 rkunpack.c -o rkunpack -lusb-1.0

    Ich habe ein USB-A to USB-A Kabel vom USB-C Port des ROCKPro64 zu meinem Notebook hergestellt.

    root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# sudo ./rkflashtool v rkflashtool: info: rkflashtool v5.2 rkflashtool: info: Detected RK3399... rkflashtool: info: interface claimed rkflashtool: info: MASK ROM MODE rkflashtool: info: chip version: -..-

    Ok, Verbindung steht.

    Eine Übersicht der Befehle

    root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# sudo ./rkflashtool rkflashtool: info: rkflashtool v5.2 rkflashtool: fatal: usage: rkflashtool b [flag] reboot device rkflashtool l <file load DDR init (MASK ROM MODE) rkflashtool L <file load USB loader (MASK ROM MODE) rkflashtool v read chip version rkflashtool n read NAND flash info rkflashtool i offset nsectors >outfile read IDBlocks rkflashtool j offset nsectors <infile write IDBlocks rkflashtool m offset nbytes >outfile read SDRAM rkflashtool M offset nbytes <infile write SDRAM rkflashtool B krnl_addr parm_addr exec SDRAM rkflashtool r partname >outfile read flash partition rkflashtool w partname <infile write flash partition rkflashtool r offset nsectors >outfile read flash rkflashtool w offset nsectors <infile write flash rkflashtool p >file fetch parameters rkflashtool P <file write parameters rkflashtool e partname erase flash (fill with 0xff) rkflashtool e offset nsectors erase flash (fill with 0xff)
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 updaten

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    579 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    eMMC Modul

    Hardware
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    Mainline Kernel 4.18.0-rc3

    Linux
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    965 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 Übersicht - was geht? **veraltet**

    Angeheftet Verschoben Archiv
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Ich sehe gerade, das könnte hier auch mal neu gemacht werden.

  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann.

    rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Platinenerkundung

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    608 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet