Skip to content

ROCKPro64 - Netflix?

ROCKPro64
  • Kamil hat ja heute sein neue Image 0.8.0rc13 veröffentlicht. Im Readme steht

    • 0.8.0rc13: Fix Chromium User Agent to make Netflix happy,

    Das muss man testen 🙂 Image ab auf die SD-Karte, ab in den ROCKPro64 und gestartet. Mein erster Test war erfolglos. Chromium meckert über irgendwelche fehlenden Plugins.

    Netflix Errocode C7701-1003
    

    Etwas später schrieb Kamil dann im IRC

    <ayufan1> FrankM: did you run install_widevine_drm.sh?
    

    Ok, das hatte ich nicht gemacht. Also, Konsole auf und den Befehl ausgeführt. Den Befehl findet man unter /usr/local/sbin

    [.....gekürzt....]
    Mounting recovery image...
    Copying Widevine DRM...
    'rootfs/opt/google/chrome/libwidevinecdm.so' -> '/opt/google/chrome/libwidevinecdm.so'
    'rootfs/opt/google/chrome/pepper/libpepflashplayer.so' -> '/opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so'
    Done.
    

    Ok, das DRM wird installiert, ohne geht ja heute beim Streaming nichts mehr.

    Chromium gestartet, Netflix aufgerufen und läuft. Ich habe klitzekleine Bildfehler, bin mir nicht sicher ob das an meiner Hardware liegt. Eigentlich funktioniert das alles, auch an anderen SOC's einwandfrei. Man kann aber Filme schauen. Muss das mal an einem anderen Monitor gegen testet.

    Bekam dann immer so ein nerviges Fehlerfenster "System program problem detected"

    Mal das hier ausprobiert.

    sudo rm /var/crash/*
    

    Danach kam das Fenster nicht mehr.

    Noch was Wichtiges zum Chromium, den Kamil benutzt.

    <ayufan1> Thanks. It survives across chromium updates too :)
    <ayufan1> Chromium is from debian/ubuntu repos.
    

    Sehr erfreulich.

    Fazit

    Netflix läuft, Bildqualität 99/100. Desktop fühlt sich mittlerweile auch nutzbar an. Sooooo ganz langsam wird es was. Was nicht ging bei einem schnellen Test, 1080p auf Youtube 😞 Und noch was nettes, was Hoffnung gibt.

    <anarsoul> tllim: btw, not sure if you heard the news - but ARM hired Rob Herring to work on panfrost

    Dieser nette Coder hier -> https://www.linaro.org/awards/5-years/rob-herring/ (?)

  • Anleitung von Kamil

    # Netflix
    
    Starting with 0.8.0rc13 it is possible to use Netflix on all **Ubuntu/armf**
    desktop images using regular Chromium browser.
    
    Due to Google policies images do not ship Widevine CDM required by Netflix
    to decrypt videos. Currently, Widevine CDM is only available for **armhf**
    and **Ubuntu**.
    
    You have to install Widevine CDM with:
    
    ```bash
    install_widevine_drm.sh
    ```
    
    This will take between 5 to 15 mins depending on the performance of SD-card,
    and your Internet connection.
    
  • ROCKPro64 - RTC

    Hardware rockpro64
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    374 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • ROCKPro64 - PCIe Probleme

    Hardware rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    406 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Danke für dein Feedback.
  • linux-mainline-u-boot

    Angeheftet Images rockpro64
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    436 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    2020.01-ayufan-2014-gff2cdd38 released ayufan: rockchip: allow to boot scsi4, as JMS585 can have 5 drives
  • FTDI Support (ayufan Kernel 5.0)

    Ungelöst Probleme? ayufan ftdi rockpro64
    8
    0 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    646 Aufrufe
    K
    Hi, leider habe ich bisher keine Antwort von Kamil erhalten. So habe ich selbst mal einen Kernel kompiliert. Als Vorlage habe ich den Ayufan 5.3 rc4 1118 genommen. Also gleiche config nur zusätzlich den FTDI und den CH341 (Arduino clones) Treiber hinzugefügt. Könnt ihr ja mal bei Lust und Laune testen. Für meine Zwecke funktioniert er gut. Gruss https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kJarihL7bAqN9y6tK-m1V4zHCSEiEWtf/view?usp=sharing
  • ROCKPro64 - Booten von USB3

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    431 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Yeah, genau das worauf ich auch warte. Wenn ich das richtig mitbekommen habe, könnte das Kamil's nächster Punkt auf seiner Liste sein.
  • ROCKPro64 - Wo stehen wir?

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    636 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Benchmark Mainline 4.17.0-rc6

    Verschoben Archiv rockpro64
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    iozone 5GT/s x2 rock64@rockpro64:/mnt$ sudo iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Iozone: Performance Test of File I/O Version $Revision: 3.429 $ Compiled for 64 bit mode. Build: linux Contributors:William Norcott, Don Capps, Isom Crawford, Kirby Collins Al Slater, Scott Rhine, Mike Wisner, Ken Goss Steve Landherr, Brad Smith, Mark Kelly, Dr. Alain CYR, Randy Dunlap, Mark Montague, Dan Million, Gavin Brebner, Jean-Marc Zucconi, Jeff Blomberg, Benny Halevy, Dave Boone, Erik Habbinga, Kris Strecker, Walter Wong, Joshua Root, Fabrice Bacchella, Zhenghua Xue, Qin Li, Darren Sawyer, Vangel Bojaxhi, Ben England, Vikentsi Lapa. Run began: Sat Jun 16 06:34:43 2018 Include fsync in write timing O_DIRECT feature enabled Auto Mode File size set to 102400 kB Record Size 4 kB Record Size 16 kB Record Size 512 kB Record Size 1024 kB Record Size 16384 kB Command line used: iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Output is in kBytes/sec Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. Processor cache size set to 1024 kBytes. Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. File stride size set to 17 * record size. random random bkwd record stride kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 102400 4 48672 104754 115838 116803 47894 103606 102400 16 168084 276437 292660 295458 162550 273703 102400 512 566572 597648 580005 589209 534508 597007 102400 1024 585621 624443 590545 599177 569452 630098 102400 16384 504871 754710 765558 780592 777696 753426 iozone test complete. 2,5GT/s x2 rock64@rockpro64:/mnt$ sudo iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Iozone: Performance Test of File I/O Version $Revision: 3.429 $ Compiled for 64 bit mode. Build: linux Contributors:William Norcott, Don Capps, Isom Crawford, Kirby Collins Al Slater, Scott Rhine, Mike Wisner, Ken Goss Steve Landherr, Brad Smith, Mark Kelly, Dr. Alain CYR, Randy Dunlap, Mark Montague, Dan Million, Gavin Brebner, Jean-Marc Zucconi, Jeff Blomberg, Benny Halevy, Dave Boone, Erik Habbinga, Kris Strecker, Walter Wong, Joshua Root, Fabrice Bacchella, Zhenghua Xue, Qin Li, Darren Sawyer, Vangel Bojaxhi, Ben England, Vikentsi Lapa. Run began: Sun Jun 17 06:54:02 2018 Include fsync in write timing O_DIRECT feature enabled Auto Mode File size set to 102400 kB Record Size 4 kB Record Size 16 kB Record Size 512 kB Record Size 1024 kB Record Size 16384 kB Command line used: iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Output is in kBytes/sec Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. Processor cache size set to 1024 kBytes. Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. File stride size set to 17 * record size. random random bkwd record stride kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 102400 4 49420 91310 102658 103415 47023 90099 102400 16 138141 202088 224648 225918 141642 202457 102400 512 335055 347517 375096 378596 364668 350005 102400 1024 345508 354999 378947 382733 375315 354783 102400 16384 306262 383155 424403 429423 428670 377476 iozone test complete.
  • stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann. rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns