Skip to content

On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.

Technology
96 64 8
  • 279 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    V
    Relocate those Native American to reservations because those computers need a place to live. Or something like that.
  • No JS, No CSS, No HTML: online "clubs" celebrate plainer websites

    Technology technology
    205
    2
    770 Stimmen
    205 Beiträge
    106 Aufrufe
    R
    Gemini is just a web replacement protocol. With basic things we remember from olden days Web, but with everything non-essential removed, for a client to be doable in a couple of days. I have my own Gemini viewer, LOL. This for me seems a completely different application from torrents. I was dreaming for a thing similar to torrent trackers for aggregating storage and computation and indexing and search, with search and aggregation and other services' responses being structured and standardized, and cryptographic identities, and some kind of market services to sell and buy storage and computation in unified and pooled, but transparent way (scripted by buyer\seller), similar to MMORPG markets, with the representation (what is a siloed service in modern web) being on the client native application, and those services allowing to build any kind of client-server huge system on them, that being global. But that's more of a global Facebook\Usenet\whatever, a killer of platforms. Their infrastructure is internal, while their representation is public on the Internet. I want to make infrastructure public on the Internet, and representation client-side, sharing it for many kinds of applications. Adding another layer to the OSI model, so to say, between transport and application layer. For this application: I think you could have some kind of Kademlia-based p2p with groups voluntarily joined (involving very huge groups) where nodes store replicas of partitions of group common data based on their pseudo-random identifiers and/or some kind of ring built from those identifiers, to balance storage and resilience. If a group has a creator, then you can have replication factor propagated signed by them, and membership too signed by them. But if having a creator (even with cryptographically delegated decisions) and propagating changes by them is not ok, then maybe just using whole data hash, or it's bittorrent-like info tree hash, as namespace with peers freely joining it can do. Then it may be better to partition not by parts of the whole piece, but by info tree? I guess making it exactly bittorrent-like is not a good idea, rather some kind of block tree, like for a filesystem, and a separate piece of information to lookup which file is in which blocks. If we are doing directory structure. Then, with freely joining it, there's no need in any owners or replication factors, I guess just pseudorandom distribution of hashes will do, and each node storing first partitions closest to its hash. Now thinking about it, such a system would be not that different from bittorrent and can even be interoperable with it. There's the issue of updates, yes, hence I've started with groups having hierarchy of creators, who can make or accept those updates. Having that and the ability to gradually store one group's data to another group, it should be possible to do forks of a certain state. But that line of thought makes reusing bittorrent only possible for part of the system. The whole database is guaranteed to be more than a normal HDD (1 TB? I dunno). Absolutely guaranteed, no doubt at all. 1 TB (for example) would be someone's collection of favorite stuff, and not too rich one.
  • Seven Goldfish

    Technology technology
    1
    5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • matrix is cooked

    Technology technology
    75
    1
    180 Stimmen
    75 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    penguin202124@sh.itjust.worksP
    That's very fair. Better start contributing I guess.
  • 1k Stimmen
    78 Beiträge
    116 Aufrufe
    K
    I just hear that they move to LibreOffice but not to Linux, ateast not right now.
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • An earnest question about the AI/LLM hate

    Technology technology
    57
    73 Stimmen
    57 Beiträge
    85 Aufrufe
    ineedmana@lemmy.worldI
    It might be interesting to cross-post this question to !fuck_ai@lemmy.world but brace for impact
  • U.S.-Sanctioned Terrorists Enjoy Premium Boost on X

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    90 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    M
    Yeah but considering who's in charge of the government, half of us will be hit with that designation sooner or later.