Skip to content

How I Started Living Off-Grid with a Portable Solar Kit – What Worked, What Didn’t

Technology
1 1 6
  • I’m not someone living in the woods full-time or running everything off solar power. But I was curious about off-grid living and wanted to reduce my reliance on the grid — especially after a few too many power outages and rising electricity bills.

    About a year ago, I decided to try it out in a small way. I bought a portable solar generator setup and started using it during camping trips and occasionally at home. Here's what worked, what didn’t, and what I wish I knew from the start.

    What I Bought

    I went with the Jackery Explorer 1000 along with two SolarSaga 100W foldable panels. My goal was to run small essentials like a mini fridge, LED lights, and a laptop during camping or during short-term outages.

    I chose this setup because I didn’t want to deal with rooftop installations, and I liked the idea of something I could pack up and take anywhere.

    What Went Well

    Easy to use: Setup was simple. Plug the panels into the power station, and it starts charging.

    Portable: I’ve taken this setup on multiple trips. It fits easily in the car and doesn’t take up much space.

    Quiet and clean: Unlike gas generators, this setup is silent and doesn’t smell. That was a big plus for me.

    Efficient on sunny days: In good sunlight, it charged fully in about 6 hours.

    What Didn’t Go So Well

    I overestimated the battery: I thought 1000Wh would last forever. It doesn’t. If you’re running a fridge, laptop, and charging phones, the power drains quickly.

    **Cloudy days were a problem: **No sun means no charge. I hadn’t thought that through and ended up stuck once with a dead battery.

    I forgot to unplug things: A couple of times I left devices charging overnight and woke up with a fully drained battery. Rookie mistake, but it happened.

    What I Wish I Knew Before Starting

    Know your power usage: Every small device adds up. It’s important to understand how much power your appliances use.

    Don’t try to do everything at once: Start small and build from there. It’s better to test the waters than to buy everything at once.

    Being off-grid changes your habits: I became more aware of what I was using and started planning power use more carefully. It’s a good shift in mindset.

    What I’d Do Differently

    Add a second battery for backup

    Use a stand or tripod to angle the solar panels for better sun exposure

    Track daily power usage to avoid surprises

    If you’ve tried something similar or are thinking about it, feel free to share your experience. I’m always interested in learning from what others are doing.

    SaveCancel

    Link Preview Image
  • 138 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    toastedravioli@midwest.socialT
    ChatGPT is not a doctor. But models trained on imaging can actually be a very useful tool for them to utilize. Even years ago, just before the AI “boom”, they were asking doctors for details on how they examine patient images and then training models on that. They found that the AI was “better” than doctors specifically because it followed the doctor’s advice 100% of the time; thereby eliminating any kind of bias from the doctor that might interfere with following their own training. Of course, the splashy headline “AI better than doctors” was ridiculous. But it does show the benefit of having a neutral tool for doctors to utilize, especially when looking at images for people who are outside of the typical demographics that much medical training is based on. (As in mostly just white men. For example, everything they train doctors on regarding knee imagining comes from images of the knees of coal miners in the UK some decades ago)
  • 208 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    K
    And yet so many people still refusing to switch to Signal, even tho Whatsapp is officially declared unsave by the government.
  • Is Internet Content Too Engaging?

    Technology technology
    3
    5 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    T
    The number of tabs I have open from sites I’ve clicked on, started reading, said “eh, I’ll get back to this later” and never have, says no.
  • Microsoft Tests Removing Its Name From Bing Search Box

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    53 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    alphapuggle@programming.devA
    Worse. Office.com now takes me to m365.cloud.microsoft which as of today now takes me to a fucking Copilot chat window. Ofc no way to disable it because gee why would anyone want to do that?
  • 1k Stimmen
    95 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    G
    Obviously the law must be simple enough to follow so that for Jim’s furniture shop is not a problem nor a too high cost to respect it, but it must be clear that if you break it you can cease to exist as company. I think this may be the root of our disagreement, I do not believe that there is any law making body today that is capable of an elegantly simple law. I could be too naive, but I think it is possible. We also definitely have a difference on opinion when it comes to the severity of the infraction, in my mind, while privacy is important, it should not have the same level of punishments associated with it when compared to something on the level of poisoning water ways; I think that a privacy law should hurt but be able to be learned from while in the poison case it should result in the bankruptcy of a company. The severity is directly proportional to the number of people affected. If you violate the privacy of 200 million people is the same that you poison the water of 10 people. And while with the poisoning scenario it could be better to jail the responsible people (for a very, very long time) and let the company survive to clean the water, once your privacy is violated there is no way back, a company could not fix it. The issue we find ourselves with today is that the aggregate of all privacy breaches makes it harmful to the people, but with a sizeable enough fine, I find it hard to believe that there would be major or lasting damage. So how much money your privacy it's worth ? 6 For this reason I don’t think it is wise to write laws that will bankrupt a company off of one infraction which was not directly or indirectly harmful to the physical well being of the people: and I am using indirectly a little bit more strict than I would like to since as I said before, the aggregate of all the information is harmful. The point is that the goal is not to bankrupt companies but to have them behave right. The penalty associated to every law IS the tool that make you respect the law. And it must be so high that you don't want to break the law. I would have to look into the laws in question, but on a surface level I think that any company should be subjected to the same baseline privacy laws, so if there isn’t anything screwy within the law that apple, Google, and Facebook are ignoring, I think it should apply to them. Trust me on this one, direct experience payment processors have a lot more rules to follow to be able to work. I do not want jail time for the CEO by default but he need to know that he will pay personally if the company break the law, it is the only way to make him run the company being sure that it follow the laws. For some reason I don’t have my usual cynicism when it comes to this issue. I think that the magnitude of loses that vested interests have in these companies would make it so that companies would police themselves for fear of losing profits. That being said I wouldn’t be opposed to some form of personal accountability on corporate leadership, but I fear that they will just end up finding a way to create a scapegoat everytime. It is not cynicism. I simply think that a huge fine to a single person (the CEO for example) is useless since it too easy to avoid and if it really huge realistically it would be never paid anyway so nothing usefull since the net worth of this kind of people is only on the paper. So if you slap a 100 billion file to Musk he will never pay because he has not the money to pay even if technically he is worth way more than that. Jail time instead is something that even Musk can experience. In general I like laws that are as objective as possible, I think that a privacy law should be written so that it is very objectively overbearing, but that has a smaller fine associated with it. This way the law is very clear on right and wrong, while also giving the businesses time and incentive to change their practices without having to sink large amount of expenses into lawyers to review every minute detail, which is the logical conclusion of the one infraction bankrupt system that you seem to be supporting. Then you write a law that explicitally state what you can do and what is not allowed is forbidden by default.
  • Generative AI's most prominent skeptic doubles down

    Technology technology
    14
    1
    43 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Z
    I don't think so, and I believe not even the current technology used for neural network simulations will bring us to AGI, yet alone LLMs.
  • 77 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    U
    I don't see Yarvin on here... this needs expansion.
  • Elon Musk’s Neuralink raises fresh cash at $9B valuation

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    12 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    bizzle@lemmy.worldB
    I'd rather die than let Elon Musk put shit in my brain.