Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Shop-Bestellung

Shop-Bestellung

ROCKPro64
10 2 1.9k
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • FrankMF

    [V] RockPro64 V2.1

    Frank's Resterampe rockpro64 verkauf
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    151 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Youtube 1080p & Netflix

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    350 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • W

    VON USB 4TB HD BOOTEN GEHT NICHT

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    653 Aufrufe
    W
    Hallo FrankM, schade das Du mir nicht weiter helfen kannst, aber danke für Deine schnelle Antwort. Mit dem Bugreport kenne ich nicht aus, bin noch leihe. Einen schönen Abend noch. Winne
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 Armbian Image - erster Test

    Verschoben Armbian armbian rockpro64
    13
    1
    0 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Erster dicker Fehlschlag mit Armbian Heute versucht mein NAS mit Armbian aufzusetzen. Raid einbinden usw. kein Problem. Als es dann an Restic und GO ging war es vorbei mit lustig. Pakete zu alt, Quellen eingebunden und nur noch Fehler. Hmm!? Da ich nach zwei Stunden keine Lust mehr hatte, habe ich das erst mal auf Eis gelegt. Manchmal ist es besser an einem anderen Tag noch mal von vorne anzufangen. Nun läuft das NAS wieder mit rock64@rockpro64v_2_1:~$ uname -a Linux rockpro64v_2_1 4.19.0-rc4-1071-ayufan-g10a63ec6c2a2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Oct 1 07:33:40 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux So schlecht läuft das ja nicht, wenn denn mal die USB3 Schnittstelle vernünftig laufen würde. Update: Manchmal muss man es auch richtig machen https://forum.frank-mankel.org/topic/420/rockpro64-armbian-go-restic-installieren
  • FrankMF

    USB 3.0 - SATA Adapter

    Hardware hardware rockpro64
    2
    3
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    819 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Heute das Ganze mal mit einer Samsung 860 Pro mit 256GB. Eingesetztes Filesystem ext4 rock64@rockpro64v2_1:/mnt$ uname -a Linux rockpro64v2_1 4.4.132-1077-rockchip-ayufan-gbaf35a9343cb #1 SMP Mon Jul 30 14:06:57 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux Speedtest rock64@rockpro64v2_1:/mnt$ sudo iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Iozone: Performance Test of File I/O Version $Revision: 3.429 $ Compiled for 64 bit mode. Build: linux Contributors:William Norcott, Don Capps, Isom Crawford, Kirby Collins Al Slater, Scott Rhine, Mike Wisner, Ken Goss Steve Landherr, Brad Smith, Mark Kelly, Dr. Alain CYR, Randy Dunlap, Mark Montague, Dan Million, Gavin Brebner, Jean-Marc Zucconi, Jeff Blomberg, Benny Halevy, Dave Boone, Erik Habbinga, Kris Strecker, Walter Wong, Joshua Root, Fabrice Bacchella, Zhenghua Xue, Qin Li, Darren Sawyer, Vangel Bojaxhi, Ben England, Vikentsi Lapa. Run began: Tue Jul 31 14:27:17 2018 Include fsync in write timing O_DIRECT feature enabled Auto Mode File size set to 102400 kB Record Size 4 kB Record Size 16 kB Record Size 512 kB Record Size 1024 kB Record Size 16384 kB Command line used: iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Output is in kBytes/sec Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. Processor cache size set to 1024 kBytes. Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. File stride size set to 17 * record size. random random bkwd record stride kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 102400 4 17896 23350 30390 31362 21611 14611 102400 16 56756 59180 86296 93819 51778 57327 102400 512 201347 221961 220840 222338 210887 230781 102400 1024 253752 273695 263884 266256 250153 273528 102400 16384 351112 356007 366417 372264 368721 356177 iozone test complete. DD Schreiben rock64@rockpro64v2_1:/mnt$ sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=sd.img bs=1M count=4096 conv=fdatasync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB, 4.0 GiB) copied, 12.8358 s, 335 MB/s Lesen rock64@rockpro64v2_1:/mnt$ sudo dd if=sd.img of=/dev/null bs=1M count=4096 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB, 4.0 GiB) copied, 11.4787 s, 374 MB/s Fazit Damit scheint der Adapter ganz gut am USB3.0 zu funktionieren. Die Schreibgeschwindigkeit ist ca. dreimal höher als mit der anderen SSD.
  • FrankMF

    Recover Button

    Hardware hardware rockpro64
    2
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    895 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Ich hab das mal ausprobiert. Den Recover Button so lange drücken, bis folgendes erscheint. In: serial@ff1a0000 Out: serial@ff1a0000 Err: serial@ff1a0000 Model: Pine64 RockPro64 rockchip_dnl_mode = 1 mode rockchip_dnl_mode = 2 mode rockchip_dnl_mode = 3 mode rockchip_dnl_mode = 4 mode entering maskrom mode... RKFlashTool clonen root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test# git clone https://github.com/rockchip-linux/rkflashtool Klone nach 'rkflashtool' ... remote: Counting objects: 663, done. remote: Total 663 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 663 Empfange Objekte: 100% (663/663), 114.94 KiB | 0 bytes/s, Fertig. Löse Unterschiede auf: 100% (367/367), Fertig. In das Verzeichnis wechseln root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test# cd rkflashtool/ Inhalt root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# ls doc Makefile rkcrc.h rkflashtool.h rkparametersblock examples README rkflashall rkmisc rkunpack.c fixversion.sh release.sh rkflashloader rkpad rkunsign flashuboot rkcrc.c rkflashtool.c rkparameters version.h RKFlashtool bauen root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# make gcc -O2 -W -Wall -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 rkflashtool.c -o rkflashtool -lusb-1.0 gcc -O2 -W -Wall -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 rkcrc.c -o rkcrc -lusb-1.0 gcc -O2 -W -Wall -I/usr/include/libusb-1.0 rkunpack.c -o rkunpack -lusb-1.0 Ich habe ein USB-A to USB-A Kabel vom USB-C Port des ROCKPro64 zu meinem Notebook hergestellt. root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# sudo ./rkflashtool v rkflashtool: info: rkflashtool v5.2 rkflashtool: info: Detected RK3399... rkflashtool: info: interface claimed rkflashtool: info: MASK ROM MODE rkflashtool: info: chip version: -..- Ok, Verbindung steht. Eine Übersicht der Befehle root@thinkpad:/home/frank/test/rkflashtool# sudo ./rkflashtool rkflashtool: info: rkflashtool v5.2 rkflashtool: fatal: usage: rkflashtool b [flag] reboot device rkflashtool l <file load DDR init (MASK ROM MODE) rkflashtool L <file load USB loader (MASK ROM MODE) rkflashtool v read chip version rkflashtool n read NAND flash info rkflashtool i offset nsectors >outfile read IDBlocks rkflashtool j offset nsectors <infile write IDBlocks rkflashtool m offset nbytes >outfile read SDRAM rkflashtool M offset nbytes <infile write SDRAM rkflashtool B krnl_addr parm_addr exec SDRAM rkflashtool r partname >outfile read flash partition rkflashtool w partname <infile write flash partition rkflashtool r offset nsectors >outfile read flash rkflashtool w offset nsectors <infile write flash rkflashtool p >file fetch parameters rkflashtool P <file write parameters rkflashtool e partname erase flash (fill with 0xff) rkflashtool e offset nsectors erase flash (fill with 0xff)
  • FrankMF

    DTS DTB Files bearbeiten

    Angeheftet ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Oder, ganz einfach sudo dtedit
  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann. rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns