Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Pine64
  3. ROCKPro64
  4. Images
  5. Kernel 4.4.x

Kernel 4.4.x

Angeheftet Images
45 1 4.6k
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • FrankMF

    RockPro64 - Mainline Kernel 6.8.0-rc3

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64 linux mainline
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    480 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    https://github.com/ayufan-rock64/linux-mainline-kernel/releases/tag/6.8.0-1190-ayufan
  • FrankMF

    Mainline 5.11.x

    Images linux rockpro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    280 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • D

    FTDI Support (ayufan Kernel 5.0)

    Ungelöst Probleme? ayufan ftdi rockpro64
    8
    0 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    680 Aufrufe
    K
    Hi, leider habe ich bisher keine Antwort von Kamil erhalten. So habe ich selbst mal einen Kernel kompiliert. Als Vorlage habe ich den Ayufan 5.3 rc4 1118 genommen. Also gleiche config nur zusätzlich den FTDI und den CH341 (Arduino clones) Treiber hinzugefügt. Könnt ihr ja mal bei Lust und Laune testen. Für meine Zwecke funktioniert er gut. Gruss https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kJarihL7bAqN9y6tK-m1V4zHCSEiEWtf/view?usp=sharing
  • W

    VON USB 4TB HD BOOTEN GEHT NICHT

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    656 Aufrufe
    W
    Hallo FrankM, schade das Du mir nicht weiter helfen kannst, aber danke für Deine schnelle Antwort. Mit dem Bugreport kenne ich nicht aus, bin noch leihe. Einen schönen Abend noch. Winne
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 Armbian Image - erster Test

    Verschoben Armbian armbian rockpro64
    13
    1
    0 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Erster dicker Fehlschlag mit Armbian Heute versucht mein NAS mit Armbian aufzusetzen. Raid einbinden usw. kein Problem. Als es dann an Restic und GO ging war es vorbei mit lustig. Pakete zu alt, Quellen eingebunden und nur noch Fehler. Hmm!? Da ich nach zwei Stunden keine Lust mehr hatte, habe ich das erst mal auf Eis gelegt. Manchmal ist es besser an einem anderen Tag noch mal von vorne anzufangen. Nun läuft das NAS wieder mit rock64@rockpro64v_2_1:~$ uname -a Linux rockpro64v_2_1 4.19.0-rc4-1071-ayufan-g10a63ec6c2a2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Oct 1 07:33:40 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux So schlecht läuft das ja nicht, wenn denn mal die USB3 Schnittstelle vernünftig laufen würde. Update: Manchmal muss man es auch richtig machen https://forum.frank-mankel.org/topic/420/rockpro64-armbian-go-restic-installieren
  • FrankMF

    Benchmarks

    Angeheftet Verschoben Archiv rockpro64
    10
    0 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    iozone Test (0.6.52) Hardware Hardware ist eine Samsung EVO 960 m.2 mit 250GB Eingabe sudo iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Ausgabe Run began: Thu Jun 14 12:04:01 2018 Include fsync in write timing O_DIRECT feature enabled Auto Mode File size set to 102400 kB Record Size 4 kB Record Size 16 kB Record Size 512 kB Record Size 1024 kB Record Size 16384 kB Command line used: iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Output is in kBytes/sec Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. Processor cache size set to 1024 kBytes. Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. File stride size set to 17 * record size. random random bkwd record stride kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 102400 4 40859 79542 101334 101666 31721 60459 102400 16 113215 202566 234307 233091 108334 154750 102400 512 362864 412548 359279 362810 340235 412626 102400 1024 400478 453205 381115 385746 372378 453548 102400 16384 583762 598047 595752 596251 590950 604690 Zum direkten Vergleich hier heute mal mit 4.17.0-rc6-1019 rock64@rockpro64:/mnt$ uname -a Linux rockpro64 4.17.0-rc6-1019-ayufan-gfafc3e1c913f #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 12 19:06:59 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux iozone Test rock64@rockpro64:/mnt$ sudo iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Iozone: Performance Test of File I/O Version $Revision: 3.429 $ Compiled for 64 bit mode. Build: linux Contributors:William Norcott, Don Capps, Isom Crawford, Kirby Collins Al Slater, Scott Rhine, Mike Wisner, Ken Goss Steve Landherr, Brad Smith, Mark Kelly, Dr. Alain CYR, Randy Dunlap, Mark Montague, Dan Million, Gavin Brebner, Jean-Marc Zucconi, Jeff Blomberg, Benny Halevy, Dave Boone, Erik Habbinga, Kris Strecker, Walter Wong, Joshua Root, Fabrice Bacchella, Zhenghua Xue, Qin Li, Darren Sawyer, Vangel Bojaxhi, Ben England, Vikentsi Lapa. Run began: Sat Jun 16 06:34:43 2018 Include fsync in write timing O_DIRECT feature enabled Auto Mode File size set to 102400 kB Record Size 4 kB Record Size 16 kB Record Size 512 kB Record Size 1024 kB Record Size 16384 kB Command line used: iozone -e -I -a -s 100M -r 4k -r 16k -r 512k -r 1024k -r 16384k -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 Output is in kBytes/sec Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. Processor cache size set to 1024 kBytes. Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. File stride size set to 17 * record size. random random bkwd record stride kB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 102400 4 48672 104754 115838 116803 47894 103606 102400 16 168084 276437 292660 295458 162550 273703 102400 512 566572 597648 580005 589209 534508 597007 102400 1024 585621 624443 590545 599177 569452 630098 102400 16384 504871 754710 765558 780592 777696 753426 iozone test complete.
  • FrankMF

    stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux rockpro64
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann. rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • FrankMF

    ROCKPro64 - Platinenerkundung

    ROCKPro64 rockpro64
    1
    12
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    634 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet