Skip to content

Unterstützung Lüfter

ROCKPro64
  • Kamil hat die Funktion des Lüfters als Kernelupdate eingebaut.

    rock64@rockpro64v2_1:~$ uname -a
    Linux rockpro64v2_1 4.4.132-1077-rockchip-ayufan-gbaf35a9343cb #1 SMP Mon Jul 30 14:06:57 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
    

    Updaten

    sudo apt-get update
    apt-cache search linux-image
    

    Dann den Kernel aussuchen, in diesem Fall

    sudo apt-get install linux-image-4.4.132-1077-rockchip-ayufan-gbaf35a9343cb
    

    Einmal neustarten

     sudo shutdown -r now
    

    Fertig!

  • Lüfter angekommen 😉

    0_1533908727391_Lüfter_ergebnis.jpg
    Die Befestigung ist böse improvisiert 🙂

    Mit armbianmonitor die Temperatur kontrolliert.

    rock64@rockpro64v2_0:/usr/local/sbin$ sudo ./armbianmonitor -m
    Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c]
    Stop monitoring using [ctrl]-[c]
    Time       big.LITTLE   load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq   CPU  C.St.
    
    15:15:23:  816/1200MHz  0.00   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 40.0°C  0/3
    15:15:28:  408/ 408MHz  0.00   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 41.1°C  0/3
    15:15:33:  408/ 408MHz  0.00   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 41.1°C  0/3
    15:15:38:  408/ 408MHz  0.00   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 41.1°C  0/3
    15:15:43:  408/ 408MHz  0.00   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 41.1°C  0/3
    15:15:48:  408/ 408MHz  0.00   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 41.1°C  0/3
    15:15:53:  408/ 408MHz  0.00   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 41.1°C  0/3
    

    Lüfter eingebaut. Einige Zeit laufen lassen. Ergebnis. (Wert 50)

    15:31:48:  408/ 408MHz  0.02   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 34.4°C  0/3
    15:31:53:  408/ 408MHz  0.02   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 34.4°C  0/3
    15:31:58:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 34.4°C  0/3
    15:32:03:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 34.4°C  0/3
    15:32:08:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 34.4°C  0/3
    15:32:14:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 34.4°C  0/3
    15:32:19:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 35.0°C  0/3
    15:32:24:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 35.0°C  0/3
    

    Aktuell müssen wir die Geschwindigkeit des Lüfters noch von Hand einstellen. Dazu findet man unter

    rock64@rockpro64v2_0:/sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0
    

    die Datei pwm1. Diese öffnen wir mal mit einem Editor.

    rock64@rockpro64v2_0:/sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0$ sudo nano pwm1
    

    In dieser Datei steht nur eine 0. Der Wert ist einstellbar von 0 - 255. Hier mal die Ausgabe, wenn das Ding mit 255 einige Zeit läuft.

    15:42:18:  408/ 408MHz  0.02   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 32.8°C  3/3
    15:42:23:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 32.8°C  3/3
    15:42:28:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 33.3°C  3/3
    15:42:34:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 32.8°C  3/3
    15:42:39:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 32.8°C  3/3
    15:42:44:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 33.3°C  3/3
    15:42:49:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 32.8°C  3/3
    15:42:54:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 32.8°C  3/3
    15:42:59:  408/ 408MHz  0.01   0%   0%   0%   0%   0%   0% 32.8°C  3/3
    

    Das war's, weiter runter komme ich hier wohl nicht.

  • Aktuell geht das nur mit Kernel 4.4.x Mit Kernel 4.18.x bekomme ich den Lüfter, mit dem Wert 255, nur kurz zum Laufen.
    Es scheint so, das irgendein Dienst in die Datei nach kurzer Zeit wieder eine 0 rein schreibt !?!?

    Im Gegensatz zum Kernel 4.4.x, läuft der Lüfter mit Wert 50 nicht an. Da muss ich nochmal nachfragen.

  • Wenn jemand einen Dienst braucht, der den Lüfter automatisch steuert, da hat jemand was gebastelt 😉

    Sieht nicht zu kompliziert aus, sollte man hin bekommen. Bei Gelegenheit werde ich mal testen.

  • Mit dem neuen Release hatte jemand das mal ausprobiert -> https://forum.frank-mankel.org/topic/795/fan-control-omv-auyfan-0-10-12-gitlab-ci-linux-build-184-kernel-5-6/6

    Dieser Kernel kam zur Anwendung

    Linux rockpro64 5.6.0-1137-ayufan-ge57f05e7bf8f #ayufan SMP Wed Apr 15 10:16:02 UTC 2020 aarch64 GNU/Linux
    

    Dort stellt man dann fest, das sich eine Kleinigkeit geändert hat. Der Pfad und der Dateiname hat sich geändert.

    Kontrollieren kann man das mit

    nano /sys/devices/platform/pwm-fan/hwmon/hwmon3/pwm1
    

    Der Wert geht von 0 - 255, wie gehabt.

  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    223 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Image 0.9.14 - Kurztest

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    216 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Kernel 4.4.x

    Angeheftet Images
    45
    0 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    4.4.202-1237-rockchip-ayufan released

    PATCH: kernel 4.4.201-202
  • stretch-minimal-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    988 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Mal ein Test was der Speicher so kann.

    rock64@rockpro64:~/tinymembench$ ./tinymembench tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency) ========================================================================== == Memory bandwidth tests == == == == Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes == == Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be == == copied per second (adding together read and writen == == bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) == == Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer == == to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the == == destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) == == Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in == == brackets == ========================================================================== C copy backwards : 2812.7 MB/s C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2811.9 MB/s C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2632.8 MB/s C copy : 2667.2 MB/s C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2633.5 MB/s C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2640.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy : 2509.8 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2431.6 MB/s C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2424.1 MB/s C fill : 4887.7 MB/s (0.5%) C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 4883.0 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 4889.3 MB/s C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 4889.2 MB/s --- standard memcpy : 2807.3 MB/s standard memset : 4890.4 MB/s (0.3%) --- NEON LDP/STP copy : 2803.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 2802.1 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 2800.7 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2745.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2745.8 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2801.9 MB/s NEON STP fill : 4888.9 MB/s (0.3%) NEON STNP fill : 4850.1 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy : 2803.8 MB/s ARM STP fill : 4893.0 MB/s (0.5%) ARM STNP fill : 4851.7 MB/s ========================================================================== == Framebuffer read tests. == == == == Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, == == typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. == == Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much == == slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of == == CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. == == == == Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, == == accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, == == PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. == == == == If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s == == or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer == == is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall == == performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX == == uses this trick. == ========================================================================== NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 602.5 MB/s NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 551.6 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 667.1 MB/s NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 605.6 MB/s ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 445.3 MB/s ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 428.8 MB/s ========================================================================== == Memory latency test == == == == Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers == == of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant == == are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM == == accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see == == page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every == == memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience == == this effect to its fullest). == == == == Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to == == be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache == == latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. == == Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing == == two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if == == the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding == == requests, dual random read has the same timings as two == == single reads performed one after another. == ========================================================================== block size : single random read / dual random read 1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns 65536 : 4.5 ns / 7.2 ns 131072 : 6.8 ns / 9.7 ns 262144 : 9.8 ns / 12.8 ns 524288 : 11.4 ns / 14.7 ns 1048576 : 16.0 ns / 22.6 ns 2097152 : 114.0 ns / 175.3 ns 4194304 : 161.7 ns / 219.9 ns 8388608 : 190.7 ns / 241.5 ns 16777216 : 205.3 ns / 250.5 ns 33554432 : 212.9 ns / 255.5 ns 67108864 : 222.3 ns / 271.1 ns
  • bionic-containers-rockpro64

    Verschoben Linux
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    877 Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Ich habe das jetzt mal endlich getestet 🙂

    https://forum.frank-mankel.org/topic/296/rockpro64-docker-image

  • Schaltpläne veröffentlicht!

    ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    964 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Wiki zum ROCKPro64 veröffentlicht!

    Verschoben ROCKPro64
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • ROCKPro64 - Übersicht

    Angeheftet Verschoben Hardware
    8
    0 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    FrankMF

    Bericht der Zeitschrift Make.

    Link Preview Image Bastelrechner NanoPC-T4 und ROCKPro64: Mehr Raspi-Konkurrenz mit Rockchip

    Leistungsfähige Raspi-Konkurrenten setzen zunehmend auf den Chip-Hersteller Rockchip. Zwei neue RK3399-Boards eröffnen die Alternative: kompakt oder günstig?

    favicon

    Make (www.heise.de)