Front Brake Lights Could Drastically Diminish Road Accident Rates
-
Yea, that's part of why I don't know for sure if they make cars the way the guy at the top of this thread is describing.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 16:56 zuletzt editiert vonSame. I don't think I've ever seen a car that can show me the signal on the opposite side of the car, but I have seen a lot of cars where I can see the indicator while stopped at an intersection and the car is perpendicular to me, since I have a little bit of angle to see the edge w/ the indicator.
99% of the time, it's not an issue, and the other 1% of the time it doesn't really matter if I can see the indicator (I.e. they're already halfway turning, so they're angled away from me).
-
Here's an idea. How about we zap the drivers after they make a turn if they didn't use a turn signal beforehand?
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:08 zuletzt editiert vonCan we do this in the same bill as the popup spikes that take out your tires if you stop across the crosswalk? The guided RPGs replacing red light cams can wait a little longer.
-
First of all, this would be illegal in many countries.
Second of all: we can differentiate cars by: has red lights, back.
If we lose this option we can no longer differentiate easily if there is a car coming towards us or driving away from us.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:12 zuletzt editiert vonThey tested using a green light for the front brake light, not a red one
-
The key detail is that, like with rear brake lights, they extinguish when the foot is removed from the brake pedal. So it's not so much the presence of the brake light, but the presence of an inactive brake light that would, serve as a warning that a car is about to start moving. This would be very helpful to drivers on a road when other drivers are pulling out too early from a side road or driveway. That little bit of extra warning is, in many situations, enough for you to pump the brakes, hit the horn, or both.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:14 zuletzt editiert vonI get what you're saying — so it's about the subconscious awareness of the state change that happens after the driver decided to go, but before the car starts moving. I can see some amount of value in that.
I still can't help but think it's going to be interpreted by many as a sign that it's safe to proceed and ignore the car rather than be prepared for any eventuality, though.
-
They tested using a green light for the front brake light, not a red one
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:15 zuletzt editiert vonIt is to colorblind people. You could use something else of course, just saying...
-
Say you're a pedestrian and a car is coming toward you as you're entering a crosswalk. Being able to see if they are braking or not could save your life.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:15 zuletzt editiert vonIf a car is braking it rides differently from one that isn't. A car is normally rather level and leans "forward" when braking.
Besides that, YOU SHOULDNT GET IN FRONT OF ANYTHING YOU ARENT SURE IS STOPPING. If it's moving fast enough that you need this, you shouldn't be trying to get in front anyways.
-
Yeah, the only thing I could think of is that I'm driving down a country road, and I see the front brake light ahead of me because someone stopped for a deer in the road or something.
in front of this vehicle" is going to get people killed.And the negative state of "the lack of this light means that the vehicle could be moving" is exactly what we have now.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:27 zuletzt editiert vonI feel that in my area the driving culture has become so toxic that there’s a better than average chance that indicating a lane change (which I always do) will lead to the vehicle in the lane you’re attempting to change into accelerating to prevent you from ‘getting in front of them.’
It’s so frustrating (and dangerous!). It seems that a lot of folks feel entitled to the road, or the patch of road in front of their car fro as long as the eye can see, and are willing to behave irrationally regarding it.I feel that telegraphing that your vehicle is slowing down (for any purpose) will lead to overconfidence or even willful misunderstanding by other drivers. A careful slow-down will turn to panic as they try to take advantage of the situation. I also think that drivers will focus on the vehicles too much, and will not focus on things like pedestrians or perhaps why your car is slowing down, and wind up contributing to the problem.
-
If a car is braking it rides differently from one that isn't. A car is normally rather level and leans "forward" when braking.
Besides that, YOU SHOULDNT GET IN FRONT OF ANYTHING YOU ARENT SURE IS STOPPING. If it's moving fast enough that you need this, you shouldn't be trying to get in front anyways.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:43 zuletzt editiert vonFor normal people, yes. This is to prevent accidents.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/424410
Study from TU Graz Reveals Front Brake Lights Could Drastically Diminish
The concept of a front brake light has been floating around the automotive industry for some time now. However, no vehicle manufacturer has yet embraced the idea and turned it into a reality on the roads. Recently, a research team led by Ernst Tomasch from the Institute of Vehicle Safety at Graz University of
BIOENGINEER.ORG (bioengineer.org)
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:50 zuletzt editiert vonThis sure riled people up.
-
And never forget about the I-D ten T error.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 17:58 zuletzt editiert von hitekrednek@lemmy.world 6. Mai 2025, 19:58Layer 0 obfuscation error.
-
Perhaps a short paragraph of text elaborating on the driver's intentions
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:08 zuletzt editiert vonNow that's taking things too far.
But the slow down thing can actually catch drivers by surprise, especially with electric vehicles.
-
I just got a Chevy Volt and when I let up off the accelerator it will start the regen and significantly decrease my speed. I assume that my brake lights are coming on because so far no one has rear-ended me or yelled at me for not having brake lights. I wish there was a good way to tell for sure though. I think it's Hyundai that does not engage the brake lights for situations like this, as I've about hit one before.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:10 zuletzt editiert vonI don't think they illuminate the brake lights, hence my comment. Technology connections has talked about this, although IDK which video it was.
-
Brake light activates before the brakes engages, so they could just be resting their foot on the brake while coasting. Pretty normal defensive driving technique. People tend to do it in heavier traffic or when people are tailgating them. Gives a way faster brake response.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:11 zuletzt editiert von sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6. Mai 2025, 20:11This is actually insane. Their brakes must wear out so fast.
-
Couldn't we just use the point system from 5th element? The car noticed you did something illegal and dedicated from your point pool.
-
Risk Compension predicts that drivers would simply use this new information to drive more aggressively, negating any possible safety benefits.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:27 zuletzt editiert von tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 6. Mai 2025, 20:29The classic example we already have of this is when you are stopped at a side road about to enter the main road, and a car coming towards you on the main road signals to turn in.
Many people take the fact the other car has their turn signal on as a guarantee that it's safe to emerge, but any good driving instructor will tell you to wait until the car actually begins to turn before you yourself emerge.
They had their signal on but that doesn't mean they're actually going to DO what the signal said they would.
Same with the front brake light. It would be like "Well their front brake light came on, so I assumed it was safe to step into the crosswalk" NO. They could have just tapped the brake a second, doesn't mean they saw you, or they will actually stop.
-
For normal people, yes. This is to prevent accidents.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:28 zuletzt editiert von fishos@lemmy.world 6. Mai 2025, 20:30Again, if you're too stupid to make sure the multiton hunk of metal is coming to a stop by all the other obvious visual markers, including watching it's speed compared to stationary objects like signs and lamp posts, then this won't do shit. People need more aweness of their surroundings, not a bunch of lights and horns because people won't pay attention.
You enter the road when it's safe, not jump in and play frogger with lights hoping to get across.
-
I still think rear signaling could be improved dramatically by using a wide third-brake light to show the intensity of braking.
For example -- I have seen some aftermarket turn signals which are bars the width of the vehicle, and show a "moving" signal starting in the center and then progressing towards the outer edge of the vehicle.
So now take that idea for brake. When you barely have your foot on the brake pedal, it would light a couple lights in the center of your brake signal. Press a little harder and now it's lighting up 1/4 of the lights from the center towards the outside edge of the vehicle. And when you're pressing the brake pedal to the floor, all of the lights are lit up from the center to the outside edges of the vehicle. The harder you press on the pedal, the more lights are illuminated.
Now you have an immediate indication of just how hard the person in front of you is braking. With the normal on/off brake signals, you don't know what's happening until moments later as you determine how fast you are approaching that car. They could be casually slowing, or they could be locking up their wheels for an accident in front of them.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:38 zuletzt editiert vonI have seen some cars flash their brake lights when ABS is activated, but this would be better
-
I still think rear signaling could be improved dramatically by using a wide third-brake light to show the intensity of braking.
For example -- I have seen some aftermarket turn signals which are bars the width of the vehicle, and show a "moving" signal starting in the center and then progressing towards the outer edge of the vehicle.
So now take that idea for brake. When you barely have your foot on the brake pedal, it would light a couple lights in the center of your brake signal. Press a little harder and now it's lighting up 1/4 of the lights from the center towards the outside edge of the vehicle. And when you're pressing the brake pedal to the floor, all of the lights are lit up from the center to the outside edges of the vehicle. The harder you press on the pedal, the more lights are illuminated.
Now you have an immediate indication of just how hard the person in front of you is braking. With the normal on/off brake signals, you don't know what's happening until moments later as you determine how fast you are approaching that car. They could be casually slowing, or they could be locking up their wheels for an accident in front of them.
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:40 zuletzt editiert von usernameblankface@lemmy.world 6. Mai 2025, 22:44I think a secondary light that blinks quickly would be a good signal of emergency braking. Like some aftermarket motorcycle taillights that start with a blinking pattern before they stay on, but reverse the order.
So, standard brake light comes on at the standard time, at the first touch of the brake. For stronger braking, the second light comes on. For emergency braking, the standard brake light stays lit while the second light begins blinking frantically.
Edit for consistency
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/424410
Study from TU Graz Reveals Front Brake Lights Could Drastically Diminish
The concept of a front brake light has been floating around the automotive industry for some time now. However, no vehicle manufacturer has yet embraced the idea and turned it into a reality on the roads. Recently, a research team led by Ernst Tomasch from the Institute of Vehicle Safety at Graz University of
BIOENGINEER.ORG (bioengineer.org)
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:41 zuletzt editiert vonThis is stupid
-
It is to colorblind people. You could use something else of course, just saying...
schrieb am 5. Juni 2025, 18:54 zuletzt editiert vonIt's doesn't matter, since the absence or presence of light would still be perceived by colour blind people. It doesn't change how they would drive, as they are already driving with the knowledge of colour blindness in mind when looking at tail lights.
-
-
Microsoft investigates Israeli military’s use of Azure cloud storage
Technology337 vor 11 Tagenvor 13 Tagen1
-
-
Dukascopy Bank terminated my account without clear reason – wrong intermediary bank, no support, and questionable staff behavior
Technology 2. Juli 2025, 15:091
-
-
-
Reddit in talks to embrace Sam Altman’s iris-scanning Orb to verify users
Technology 20. Juni 2025, 20:241
-