Front Brake Lights Could Drastically Diminish Road Accident Rates
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/424410
This will lead to people braking momentarily to slow down, and others turning in front of slowing down traffic.
Little benefit, but the cost of adding front brake lights would be passed on to the car buyers.
-
Here's an idea. How about we zap the drivers after they make a turn if they didn't use a turn signal beforehand?
Couldn't we just use the point system from 5th element? The car noticed you did something illegal and dedicated from your point pool.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/424410
Would speed up crosswalks a lot too. Whenever I cross a crosswalk with my dog I don't want to risk me misjudging the braking of cars so I tend to really wait until I'm sure they're stopping.
-
I don't understand this at all. Why do I, as a person in front of a vehicle, care whether or not it's braking?
Sounds like it can help oncoming traffic as well as traffic to either side of the vehicle
-
I've always heard it as "PICNIC"
Problem In Chair, Not In Computer
Oh, you think I need a new chair? Will the Internet come back then?
-
and on the opposite side don’t turn on your emergency lights while driving in bad weather. you’re only causing confusion by making it seem like you have turn signals on if i can’t see both blinkers.
Thats more an issue of using the same lamp for rear lights and turn signal
-
Sounds like it can help oncoming traffic as well as traffic to either side of the vehicle
Yeah, the only thing I could think of is that I'm driving down a country road, and I see the front brake light ahead of me because someone stopped for a deer in the road or something.
in front of this vehicle" is going to get people killed.And the negative state of "the lack of this light means that the vehicle could be moving" is exactly what we have now.
-
I don't understand this at all. Why do I, as a person in front of a vehicle, care whether or not it's braking?
My main thoughts instantly come to someone in the opposing left turn lane, if they are not applying the brakes they are likely starting to turn and if they do it right in front of you, you have more of a heads up than just them starting to turn and can set yourself in a better position to hopefully stop in time. Driving is all about judgment calls and having more info quicker is important to those calls.
-
Personally I just want front turn signals to be visible from the opposite side again
Not sure if I read that correctly, but I don't think this has ever been the case?
I mean when a car is coming at me from a cross street, I want to be able to tell if they're turning or just an asshole not using their signal. On some cars, the turn signal is mounted so far to the side that if they're approaching from my right and turning right onto the same street as me, I can't see that turn signal. Sometimes combined with the roundness of the nose exacerbating the problem.
-
I don't understand this at all. Why do I, as a person in front of a vehicle, care whether or not it's braking?
The key detail is that, like with rear brake lights, they extinguish when the foot is removed from the brake pedal. So it's not so much the presence of the brake light, but the presence of an inactive brake light that would, serve as a warning that a car is about to start moving. This would be very helpful to drivers on a road when other drivers are pulling out too early from a side road or driveway. That little bit of extra warning is, in many situations, enough for you to pump the brakes, hit the horn, or both.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/424410
Risk Compension predicts that drivers would simply use this new information to drive more aggressively, negating any possible safety benefits.
-
I think what he wants is the front turn signal to wrap around the front, so I can see the left signal from the right quarter.
I'm not aware that this is not the case, but I don't know that I would have noticed if it was not.
i don't think that was ever required in the US. it is elsewhere though.
-
This wouldn’t really be helpful to those who are colorblind.
okay, pick a different color then. it's a solvable problem.
-
Well you should educate yourself on the rules of the method of travel no matter.
If you were to go up in the air and you didn’t educate yourself on what the lights mean, you’re going to ruin everyone else’s day in your incredibly dangerous ignorance.
You don’t take a paddle boat onto the water without understanding some basic principles of water navigation… why would roads in this specific cause be any different? We already do with most land methods, this one is gonna be hinge? Nah. Ignorance isn’t an excuse.
I have, and that's my point.
I'm a lowly drone pilot that isn't really made to understand what those lights mean but did out of my sheer curiosity.
But the average pedestrian is going to take some, teaching?
-
The hazards are to indicate you are stopped and now a hazard.
Only when you are stopped and now a hazard. Your car becomes a blinking light. We have road rules for blinking lights, so it SHOULD be saying one specific thing.
Thank you for coming to this road safety talk.
and honestly i have the same problem with that intended use. it often looks like a stopped car is attempting to turn out into traffic. IMO emergency lights should have a faster blink pattern or something to differentiate from turn signals.
-
I don't understand this at all. Why do I, as a person in front of a vehicle, care whether or not it's braking?
for example, say you are waiting to make a left turn, it would be nice to know if oncoming cars are braking or not. if they are stopped and you see their brake lights turning off, you can judge if you should hurry up or not turn at all.
-
i don't think that was ever required in the US. it is elsewhere though.
Can't speak to "required." But I know it used to be done.
-
I've always heard it as "PICNIC"
Problem In Chair, Not In Computer
And never forget about the I-D ten T error.
-
My main thoughts instantly come to someone in the opposing left turn lane, if they are not applying the brakes they are likely starting to turn and if they do it right in front of you, you have more of a heads up than just them starting to turn and can set yourself in a better position to hopefully stop in time. Driving is all about judgment calls and having more info quicker is important to those calls.
But isn't that exactly the situation we're in now? If there's a car in the opposing left turn lane, they might start to turn in front of you.
The only thing the light does is say "right now, they're braking". It doesn't say whether they're moving or stationary any more than the headlights, and it doesn't say anything about their intentions or whether it's safe to enter the intersection.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/424410
Struggled with this for a second, then I figured it out...
The brake light coming ON isn't the important part, like the rear brake lights... it's the brake lights turning OFF that's important in the front.
So maybe, now hear me out, MAYBE we need to invert that. Have front brake lights that are on ALL the time, and pressing the brake turns them off to indicate safety?