The Trump administration recently published "America's AI Action Plan". One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST's AI Risk Framework.

Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are "objective and free from top-down ideological bias".

Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.

I'm glad that they're acknowledging that DEI and climate change are not misinformation at least.

Thank you anyone who profiles entire people with stereotypes and outright lies is a bigot, no matter what they say

Like how some americans see the Middel East, Russia, China, Israel, Palestine, Mexico etc etc etc..

Its not nice when its going the other way, is it.

Thank you anyone who profiles entire people with stereotypes and outright lies is a bigot, no matter what they say

I don't do that because it wouldn't be right. Doesn't matter who did what to me in the past.

For instance if you were a plumber and you intentionally smashed a piece of furniture while at a clients house, does that mean all plumbers are violently vandalizing people's homes ,no.

Because adult human beings know that the actions of one do not define the actions of all.

I am not changing this position. You can get the last word, throw an insult at me or do nothing.

Choice is yours but I'm done. I don't have to defend the correct position. It is correct.

Again, AMERICA doesn't want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.

The phrasing means everything.

Example: "Trump wants..."

VS

Example: "America wants..."

Big difference. Executive Orders are a memo, not law. It's disturbing that I have to keep saying this and explaining this.

That...what???

No, your choice of phrasing conveys your message.

If you're argument is not against the American people, but rather the administration, then your wording is, well, wrong.

Friend, seriously...listen to the very clear reason being used to explain the deficiency of your argument here.

The way you phrase something absolutely changes the meaning of its point. You can't say something and then try to justify that the ends are the same, so it's cool. Literally why people use the phrase "the ends don't justify the means".

If Trump comes out and says some dumb shit, you can't just say "AMERICA WANTS THIS", because that is obviously untrue.

It would work the same way with 4 people in a car, and the driver wants hamburgers. The entire car doesn't want hamburgers, just the driver of the car. How you want to argue the outcome or explanation of that very much decides on how you intend to phrase the situation. All you know right now is that the driver wants a hamburger, so it would disingenuous to say everyone wants hamburgers.

Again, AMERICA doesn't want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.

Didn't you hear about the scandals with Steam and Itch with traditional centralised payment processors? Decentralised payments like crypto are a method of solving that issue.

Thank you anyone who profiles entire people with stereotypes and outright lies is a bigot, no matter what they say

Again, AMERICA doesn't want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.

I don't do that because it wouldn't be right. Doesn't matter who did what to me in the past.

For instance if you were a plumber and you intentionally smashed a piece of furniture while at a clients house, does that mean all plumbers are violently vandalizing people's homes ,no.

Because adult human beings know that the actions of one do not define the actions of all.

I am not changing this position. You can get the last word, throw an insult at me or do nothing.

Choice is yours but I'm done. I don't have to defend the correct position. It is correct.

Logical processes require logic to function. This is just going to end up creating contradictions and decreasing the AI's ability to actually produce usable work. So whichever AI has the most contradictions will probably cause a drop in quality for productivity use.

It will be interesting to see how different AI's continue to diverge in quality and reputation as time passes.

America absolutely wants this. If they didn’t they would stop it. Period.

"America" != "The U.S."

Its like saying "The French [edit: population] want <something form a France PM press release> [edit: because <the press release>] "

Edit: fixed bad example and made the argument clearer.

LOL

Sure, Jan.

We should stop it. Period. I'll snap my non-billionaire fingers and just stop it. Like I'm Dorothy and clicking my ruby slippered heels together.

Most Americans are working three jobs and 100 hours a week to be able to rent a roach-infested studio and keep their kids from starving.

AI isn't even in the top ten of issues that most Americans have the time or energy to confront in a meaningful way.

But let's not allow the reality of life in this country to interfere with a good, silly Internet screed.

eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity and inclusion

They are openly authoritarian now, define what "truth" is? And want americans to be miserable and closed-minded bigots like themselves.

Recommendation: build a system of verifiable facts independent of governments.