America wants AI that doesn't care about misinformation, DEI, and climate change
-
As a US citizen, prove to me that most Americans don't want this.
Yeah, I see the protests, even in my Trump-loving town.
But that's it. People holding signs.
I don't see aggressive action. I don't see the necessary violence - yeah I said it.
I'm moving out of the country because everyone I've tried to rally says they're too busy, they don't have time, they care but they don't care that much, they think everything will work out, or they believe it isn't as bad as the news says.
The people I've voted for and elected just sit on their hands and do fuck all.
I'm 110% for fighting for and defending what I used to believe in, but not when literally all evidence and signs point to nobody else giving a shit.
Someone call me when you're ready to legitimately strategize about how to topple this fascist regime.
Zero presidents have ever lost as much support for anything at any time in the history of this country: https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker
Not only is this a wildly unpopular president, it's a president who has shed 35-50% of their own voters. It's proof positive that you are wrong.
-
Apparently you don't know how a democracy works.
-
Zero presidents have ever lost as much support for anything at any time in the history of this country: https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker
Not only is this a wildly unpopular president, it's a president who has shed 35-50% of their own voters. It's proof positive that you are wrong.
Thank you for the information. I just hope it leads to action. Poll results to me are just someone standing around waving a sign.
These fascists didn't rise to power by following all the rules, and they won't exit or lose power by us following the rules. It's a sad truth.
-
"America" != "The U.S."
Its like saying "The French [edit: population] want <something form a France PM press release> [edit: because <the press release>] "
Edit: fixed bad example and made the argument clearer.
That's... literally how it works.
If the French president or French government made an official statement, headlines could and do accurately state " the French want x" -
AI, crypto, just like .com, are very much very real, valuable technologies that have and will continue to stick around and be used until we destroy ourselves, or something even more advanced comes along.
What was/is a grift, is all the stupid money and people around it that don't have a damn clue where the limits of the technologies actually lie, what kinds of real problems are solved and have been sold lies stop lies without doing their due diligence.
Neither AI, nor Crypto have had any meaningful positive impact on the world.
-
Thank you for the information. I just hope it leads to action. Poll results to me are just someone standing around waving a sign.
These fascists didn't rise to power by following all the rules, and they won't exit or lose power by us following the rules. It's a sad truth.
We've seen this before.
They know how it ends.
-
Zero presidents have ever lost as much support for anything at any time in the history of this country: https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker
Not only is this a wildly unpopular president, it's a president who has shed 35-50% of their own voters. It's proof positive that you are wrong.
I look forward to the big swing in the mid terms then based off your information
-
That's... literally how it works.
If the French president or French government made an official statement, headlines could and do accurately state " the French want x"Bad example sorry.
Edit: improved comment
-
Bad example sorry.
Edit: improved comment
Sure, but your new sentence isn't like the one you are complaining about... so yes, if the headline was different than it is now there's a chance it would be a bad headline.
-
I agree with this, mostly. The tech is real -- The blockchain has solid math behind it. I don't know if I agree with its value though. The viable usecases are significantly limited compared to the hype behind them. Bitcoin for example is still inherently inefficient compared to conventional payment systems. AI feels a lot like that -- lots of hype with very little substance at its core.
Didn't you hear about the scandals with Steam and Itch with traditional centralised payment processors? Decentralised payments like crypto are a method of solving that issue.
-
The Trump administration recently published "America's AI Action Plan". One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST's AI Risk Framework.
Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are "objective and free from top-down ideological bias".
Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.
Hmm. It does sound a bit unhinged. Do I dare say tyrannical? Evil even? Legitimising themselves as a target?
-
Again, AMERICA doesn't want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.
While I understand what you are saying, let's not forget that the people who helped the turd get into power were not just those actively voting for him but also those who didn't vote because "both sides!!". That's not "a minority of the country" but actually the majority of it.
-
This is going to be catastrophic. Imagine the government using AI that does not factor that waters will rise and things will get more humid when deciding to build houses or bridges only for them to be underwater.
How does one get rid of misinformation and tell it to not give real answers. I just don't get how you can say weather anomalies are consistently occuring more and more.. and it is not tied together at all. It's like trying to do math and having 10 apples. But we cannot recognize we have a total 10 apples. So we say we have 10 individual appels, but we can't say they add up to ten.
-
The Trump administration recently published "America's AI Action Plan". One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST's AI Risk Framework.
Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are "objective and free from top-down ideological bias".
Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.
« America, fuck yeah » takes a whole new meaning
-
Didn't you hear about the scandals with Steam and Itch with traditional centralised payment processors? Decentralised payments like crypto are a method of solving that issue.
The steam/itch situation is a bit complicated. I think the organization behind that action has bad motivations, so it's not the best example for the long term. My guess is that itch will update their NSFW policy to allow for some NSFW content, but not content that depicts truly heinous material.
The reason I would support that type of activism, to an extent, is that it was effective against Musk when he started turning twitter into a hellscape: https://www.freepress.net/sites/default/files/2022-11/stop_toxic_twitter_coalition_open_letter_to_twitter_final.pdf
-
The Trump administration recently published "America's AI Action Plan". One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST's AI Risk Framework.
Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are "objective and free from top-down ideological bias".
Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.
It is essential that AI is built with freedom of expression and that the government doesn't interfere
Recommended actions:
The government should limit what AI can talk about -
The Trump administration recently published "America's AI Action Plan". One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST's AI Risk Framework.
Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are "objective and free from top-down ideological bias".
Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.
I'm glad that they're acknowledging that DEI and climate change are not misinformation at least.
-
Again, AMERICA doesn't want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.
Thank you anyone who profiles entire people with stereotypes and outright lies is a bigot, no matter what they say
-
As a US citizen, prove to me that most Americans don't want this.
Yeah, I see the protests, even in my Trump-loving town.
But that's it. People holding signs.
I don't see aggressive action. I don't see the necessary violence - yeah I said it.
I'm moving out of the country because everyone I've tried to rally says they're too busy, they don't have time, they care but they don't care that much, they think everything will work out, or they believe it isn't as bad as the news says.
The people I've voted for and elected just sit on their hands and do fuck all.
I'm 110% for fighting for and defending what I used to believe in, but not when literally all evidence and signs point to nobody else giving a shit.
Someone call me when you're ready to legitimately strategize about how to topple this fascist regime.
As a u s citizen, you're wrong. End of story most don't want it. Trump wants it. No one voted for trump because of a I. So stop lying to people here.
Oh and since you're so gungho to do it, why aren't you taking the steps above?
Because it seems awful like you're a Trumper trying to stir violence
-
The Trump administration recently published "America's AI Action Plan". One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST's AI Risk Framework.
Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are "objective and free from top-down ideological bias".
Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.
eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity and inclusion
They are openly authoritarian now, define what "truth" is? And want americans to be miserable and closed-minded bigots like themselves.
Recommendation: build a system of verifiable facts independent of governments.