phillycodehound@indieweb.social that's awesome to hear! I'd love to hear what thoughts you have about how we can improve the fediverse together

johnefrancis@cosocial.ca ooooh! I'd love to! Although I'd have to buy one from the UK or something, at a premium, no less, and if it breaks I'm basically SOL, so... How much inconvenience do I take on for the sake of principle?

No problem at all reiver@mastodon.social thanks for doing this hard post-conference work!

thisismissem@hachyderm.io or maybe context? Hahaha I will never stop promoting this property. cc evan@cosocial.ca Edit: or even attributedTo

matt@oslo.town heck yes, keep going!

chad@mstdn.ca re: "step up or shut up", thisismissem@hachyderm.io has been (is currently?) a contributor for Pixelfed, and was the person responsible for the discovery, analysis, and responsible disclosure of the 10/10 severity vulnerability from last year. She also provided best practice recommendations and guidance on remediation, all for free (there was no security fund back then, and Pixelfed has no bug bounty.) For her to buck responsible disclosure practice (and even then she's being deliberately vague about the technical details) is a sign that someone is being stonewalled.

@dansup@mastodon.social no, NodeBB v4 always reports activitypub in protocols, even if disabled. I can update that so it's dependent on the global switch, but it's still possible to have AP enabled but not have any categories federating. I'm just wondering whether FediDB found the forums because content got federated, or whether there was some proactive nodeinfo crawling, that's all. cc @jaz@mastodon.iftas.org