OpenAI supremo Sam Altman says he 'doesn't know how' he would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT
Technology
77
Beiträge
62
Kommentatoren
961
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 01:09 zuletzt editiert von
I also don't understand how anyone could possibly not be a massive disappointment to their family without my patented Solutionbot 3600 that you can also take advantage of for just $$/month forever.
Money please!
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 01:19 zuletzt editiert von
In other words, he's an idiot.
-
What a gimp
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 01:46 zuletzt editiert vonHey, come on now! Don't be like that! That's totally uncalled for! Gimps are just living their best sexual fantasies within the context of safe and sensual consent. They've done nothing wrong!
-
Has Sam Altman never heard of parenting books?
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 03:38 zuletzt editiert vonbooks
I guess he just didn't like to buy a kindle.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 03:41 zuletzt editiert von
Cute how he finds new ways every day to say: "I'm a loser."
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:20 zuletzt editiert von
It’s sad that all of our collective wisdom is so dead and gone people will turn to a glorified chatbot instead
-
I asked ChatGPT how Sam Altman would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT:
Sam Altman would’ve taken care of his baby the same way the rest of us did before his chatbot existed—by learning, asking, fumbling, caring, and figuring it out like a goddamn human.
Altman’s quote—“I don’t know how I would’ve done that”—feels less like a reflection on parenthood and more like an unintentional glimpse into the kind of disconnection that can happen when you believe your product is the answer to everything.
Of course, he’s not wrong that AI can be useful. But if your first thought when your newborn won’t sleep is to consult ChatGPT, that says more about your priorities than it does about parenthood.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:54 zuletzt editiert von barsoap@lemm.eethe rest of us
feels [...] like
See even ChatGPT can emulate self-awareness better than Sam Altman.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:57 zuletzt editiert von
Does he have a humiliation kink?
-
That says a lot about how worthless if a human he is.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:09 zuletzt editiert vonif a human he is
Couldn't have said it better myself.
-
It’s sad that all of our collective wisdom is so dead and gone people will turn to a glorified chatbot instead
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:13 zuletzt editiert von xavier666@lemm.eePlease be a bit considerate. It's hard for him to form human connections when you are trying to be a plague on humanity.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 07:48 zuletzt editiert von
We have mistaken rationality for a philosophy rather than a methodology, and efficiency for a virtue without any particular end in mind.
To have a unique, personal, subjective, divergent human experience is to sin against your prescribed algorithm.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 09:11 zuletzt editiert von
For thousands of years people have raised their kids without the benefit of the moneypit 9000, Sam Altman is apparently dumber then a caveman.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 09:43 zuletzt editiert von
What in the actual fuck ‽
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 10:00 zuletzt editiert von
Your kids will grow up and hate you because you suck as a dad.
-
Does he have a humiliation kink?
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 10:20 zuletzt editiert vonsammy knows what to say to get incurious venture capitalists to give him money
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 10:23 zuletzt editiert von
Maybe because he’s an idiot?
-
For thousands of years people have raised their kids without the benefit of the moneypit 9000, Sam Altman is apparently dumber then a caveman.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 11:41 zuletzt editiert vonMillions.
-
He’s married.
I mean why are you surprised, he’s not a bad looking guy and is very successful.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 11:46 zuletzt editiert vonSuccessful is debatable. There's no question he is financially successful, but he fails at every metric I personally measure success by: Honesty, integrity, loyalty, and kindness. I'm not saying my metric is the correct one by any means, just that the definnition of success varies across humanity.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 11:59 zuletzt editiert von atlien51@lemm.ee
I wonder how people have been doing it, since the beginning of time, with no help from technology.
Ya big fucking clown.
Edit:
Honestly bro what is it about tech bros being the biggest fucking losers on the face of this planet? I have more respect for street sweepers at this point
-
Successful is debatable. There's no question he is financially successful, but he fails at every metric I personally measure success by: Honesty, integrity, loyalty, and kindness. I'm not saying my metric is the correct one by any means, just that the definnition of success varies across humanity.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 12:10 zuletzt editiert vonAnything is debatable. I could debate that the sky is not blue of if I wanted to. I’m debating you right now.
He is successful by the metrics in which society measures success and that’s all I meant by that.
