Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
-
Corporate goons always use fear as a tool. This coupled with fucking up the entire tech industry via layoffs, and suddenly engineer leverage basically flies out the window entirely. You can’t replace senior devs with AI. You can try and I will enjoy watching you fail.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 16:14 zuletzt editiert vonYou can't even replace junior devs with AI. This is a completely false narrative intended to demoralize workers into not exercising their market power.
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 16:31 zuletzt editiert vonNo shit, right? Seems obvious. Applies to many more than just Amazon employees.
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 16:48 zuletzt editiert vonAre we done for?
Automation is a great thing, IF Universal Basic Income is also implemented.
-
Are we done for?
Automation is a great thing, IF Universal Basic Income is also implemented.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 16:54 zuletzt editiert von lwd@lemm.eedeleted by creator
-
You can't even replace junior devs with AI. This is a completely false narrative intended to demoralize workers into not exercising their market power.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 16:55 zuletzt editiert vonYeah, for clarity, I don’t think it can replace any dev. I mentioned senior because there’s a ton of soft skill and historical context involved that senior devs hold that is absolutely not replaceable. I’ve found AI to be helpful for grunt work and nothing else. It constantly chokes, even when being fed the entire codebase for reference.
-
Are we done for?
Automation is a great thing, IF Universal Basic Income is also implemented.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 18:34 zuletzt editiert vonWe need to be taxing the companies for every job they replace with ai and use that to pay for it.
-
Are we done for?
Automation is a great thing, IF Universal Basic Income is also implemented.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 18:56 zuletzt editiert vonWe are fucked, The rich are literally creating armies of robots.
-
No. Amazon has been trying to cut head count for years now. They were hoping RTO5 would do the trick but because every company is trying to do the same thing people didn’t have a ship to jump to.
“Our AI is so great!” Is a way to mask that their finances aren’t good and they dramatically made the wrong bet in 2021 hiring so much.
Honestly most of the time at Amazon you’re doing more meetings and red tape than you are coding so I don’t expect AI to magically fix shit for them.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 19:11 zuletzt editiert vonTheir shopping experience is so much worse than only 3 years ago. Whatever they are doing, they are doing it wrong.
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 19:51 zuletzt editiert vonThe people who are predicting that AI will replace X% of jobs are usually not qualified to make that determination. They don't do those jobs, and they don't have any idea what is involved in those peoples jobs. They are way too high up the corporate ladder to have actually been doing any real work in the last 10 years. They were sold some AI product which promises to lay off thousands of workers, and they seem to have believed it implicitly.
What's sickening to me is how enthusiastic they seem to be about ruining their employees lives
-
Their shopping experience is so much worse than only 3 years ago. Whatever they are doing, they are doing it wrong.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 19:54 zuletzt editiert vonAmazon is a technology company now. For a long time the storefront and logistics have been a tech demo for Amazon Web Services.
For instance: FreeRTOS
-
Their shopping experience is so much worse than only 3 years ago. Whatever they are doing, they are doing it wrong.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 19:59 zuletzt editiert vonEven Bezos has acknowledged that companies really only last 30 years . They inevitably decline. Amazon was founded by Jeff Bezos from his garage in Bellevue, Washington,[3] on July 5, 1994
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 20:07 zuletzt editiert vongo on, do it. do it so we get rid of this addiction
-
The people who are predicting that AI will replace X% of jobs are usually not qualified to make that determination. They don't do those jobs, and they don't have any idea what is involved in those peoples jobs. They are way too high up the corporate ladder to have actually been doing any real work in the last 10 years. They were sold some AI product which promises to lay off thousands of workers, and they seem to have believed it implicitly.
What's sickening to me is how enthusiastic they seem to be about ruining their employees lives
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 20:13 zuletzt editiert vonIronically, save for specific positions that require facetime and political shrewdness, it is these same prognosticators whose roles can most readily be fulfilled by Ai
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 20:30 zuletzt editiert vonExactly what a good leader would tell their team to motivate them. /s
-
Something I think should be on the same level as "if buying isn't owning piracy isn't theft" is something like "if an ai/robot can take my job why should I have to work"
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 21:46 zuletzt editiert vonwhy should I have to work
Because landlords would like to keep their wealth extraction going.
In theory we could get solar panels and batteries for power, some cheap robots for growing food, but all land is owned.
-
why should I have to work
Because landlords would like to keep their wealth extraction going.
In theory we could get solar panels and batteries for power, some cheap robots for growing food, but all land is owned.
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 21:50 zuletzt editiert vonOn how about "the robot can take my job I only want the money"
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 18. Juni 2025, 23:36 zuletzt editiert vonDid someone tell Amazon that some of the staff they will let go will have access to AI as well and will turn around and start competing with them? Someone should as AI is not just for corporations. In fact it is and may continue to benefit individuals and small teams more.
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 11:34 zuletzt editiert von cocodapuf@lemmy.worldTime for the AI teams to suddenly have tech issues.
"Sorry, the whole codebase is just gone! We have no idea what happened!"
"Must have been the S3 storage"
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 11:56 zuletzt editiert vonAh yes those famous "Agents". They will of course write themselves, adapt themselves to changing environment and run on their own without any supervision.
-
As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done
we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce
Are we done for?
Amazon boss tells staff AI means their jobs are at risk in coming years
Andrew Jassy tells white collar workers that such technology means fewer people will be needed for some jobs
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 12:28 zuletzt editiert vonBetween AI and Robotics, we will likely have a permanently unemployed segment of close to 50%, or even more, within the next decade.
Not everyone will be able to be retrained to be a robotics engineer or AI programmer, and many, many jobs that are considered entry-level will disappear. Imagine a world where most fast food and retail workers are unemployed.
When 40% of America is unemployed, the government will be faced with 2 options - Universal Basic Income, or reducing the population by 40%. Which solution will each party embrace, and how will they accomplish their objectives?
-
-
95% of Companies See ‘Zero Return’ on $30 Billion Generative AI Spend, MIT Report Finds
Technology vor 19 Stunden1
-
AI-backed medical debt company claims payment plans can help US healthcare costs
Technology71 vor 26 Tagenvor 28 Tagen1
-
60% of Teachers Used AI This Year and Saved up to 6 Hours of Work a Week
Technology 8. Juli 2025, 13:001
-
AI learns math reasoning by playing Snake and Tetris-like games rather than using math datasets
Technology 22. Juni 2025, 15:271
-
Interactive McCabe-Thiele Diagram Calculator for Binary Distillation - ChemEnggCalc
Technology 3. Juni 2025, 15:491
-
A fake Facebook event disguised as a math problem has been one of its top posts for 6 months
Technology 31. Mai 2025, 08:341
-
Silicon Valley cities hit with request for residents' emails to train AI
Technology 27. Mai 2025, 22:411