YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content. Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 20:29 zuletzt editiert von
"Muh
freedumsprofit" outweighs life. The silent bit spoken aloud. Cool cool.As expected from this timeline and this garbage conglomerate.
-
Do people still have to say unalive?
Censorship is goddamn stupid.
They should just tag content & let people decide what to filter.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 20:57 zuletzt editiert vonI'm going to start using "inhumed".
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:07 zuletzt editiert von propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 6. Nov. 2025, 23:10
Good. I don't really care about youtube, but less censorship is always a good thing.
How can you people say you respect science when you support silencing any criticism of it? That's not science. That's religion.
That said, this criteria clearly only exists to protect "influencers" who make youtube a proportional amount of money. If you have a channel with very little traffic and you say something controversial, you'd better believe your "freedom of expression value" will not be high enough to outweigh the corporation's perceived "harm risk."
-
And still block curse words and specific terms. Fuck this place
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:12 zuletzt editiert vonFuck this place
Are you implying you don't use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?
Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:14 zuletzt editiert von
Can we talk about adblockers, or is that still somehow worse than nazi shit?
Btw they removed a popular Youtuber's "Degoogle Your Life" series lmfao (Linus Tech Tips). But a far-right thinnly-veiled racist video? All a'okay according to Google.
-
Fuck this place
Are you implying you don't use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?
Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:24 zuletzt editiert vonPersonally I don't use YouTube the website at all at this point. I'm 100℅ Freetube and yt-dlp/Plex for watching the channels I like.
-
Fuck this place
Are you implying you don't use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?
Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:41 zuletzt editiert vonThe alternatives are there. They don't have the volume of course, but they're very much born...
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:45 zuletzt editiert von
youtube shadowbanning, demonitization and censorship is the most retarded shit that's ever happened to the internet. the whole website is videos and comments of people who cater to kids and commercial advertisers and cant say shit.
-
Do people still have to say unalive?
Censorship is goddamn stupid.
They should just tag content & let people decide what to filter.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:46 zuletzt editiert vonContent speak continously erodes my frontal lobe.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 22:11 zuletzt editiert von
We will (still) allow children's cartoon characters to be mutilated and put into explicit situations and then push them as child friendly, but how dare you use a swear in the first 15 seconds of a video or say the work kill.
-
Fuck this place
Are you implying you don't use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?
Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 22:12 zuletzt editiert vonI'm not sure of what you mean at the end there.
I see youtube content. I do not pay for it and they are likely unhappy that I get to use it as they get zero benefit from it.
-
This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 22:18 zuletzt editiert vonYep. It's exactly what Facebook did not long ago. It's just the most open oligarchy you can imagine, just consolidating their interests to push fascism at full throttle.
Its gonna be interesting, knowing some world cup is gonna happen on US soil as well.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 22:42 zuletzt editiert von
Intention: YouTubers can stop with the whole self censoring shit.
Example: Unaliving; PDF file; grape; etc.
Reality: Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, and other right wing grifters receive zero censorship while YouTubers still have to self censor to receive monetization.
-
yes, surprising a total of 0 people.
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 22:44 zuletzt editiert vonI am Jack’s lack of surprise.
-
Intention: YouTubers can stop with the whole self censoring shit.
Example: Unaliving; PDF file; grape; etc.
Reality: Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, and other right wing grifters receive zero censorship while YouTubers still have to self censor to receive monetization.
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 22:55 zuletzt editiert vonYouTube started to censor foss content for being violet and dangerous.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 23:02 zuletzt editiert von flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 6. Dez. 2025, 01:04
See the issue here is Google/Youtube still get to be the ones to decide what "may outweigh the harm risk". And the answer I bet will usually be whichever one serves their financial interests.
Which on one hand sure, it is their platform after all. But don't do me dry and claim you used lube.
-
This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 23:12 zuletzt editiert vonFirst thought exactly.
-
Personally I don't use YouTube the website at all at this point. I'm 100℅ Freetube and yt-dlp/Plex for watching the channels I like.
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 01:30 zuletzt editiert vonThat's fine, still YouTube at its core though.
-
The alternatives are there. They don't have the volume of course, but they're very much born...
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 01:32 zuletzt editiert vonYes they are, some from the very conception of YouTube perhaps, but they are not real alternatives a real alternative would be one where all your subscriptions also upload the same content there, it is totally not YT based and you get the same or similar ecosystem Google provides, I don't think too many channels fit this.
-
Yes they are, some from the very conception of YouTube perhaps, but they are not real alternatives a real alternative would be one where all your subscriptions also upload the same content there, it is totally not YT based and you get the same or similar ecosystem Google provides, I don't think too many channels fit this.
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 02:05 zuletzt editiert vonI mean, if your requirement for a youtube alternative is that it's as big as YouTube, you're just guaranteeing that there will never be a YouTube alternative...
-
Australian anti-porn group claims responsibility for Steam's new censorship rules in victory against 'porn sick brain rotted pedo gamer fetishists', and things only get weirder from there
Technology67 vor 20 Tagenvor 24 Tagen1
-
Two major AI coding tools wiped out user data after making cascading mistakes
Technology67 vor 24 Tagenvor 25 Tagen1
-
-
-
You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning
Technology 25. Juni 2025, 06:541
-
OpenAI supremo Sam Altman says he 'doesn't know how' he would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT
Technology 19. Juni 2025, 18:011
-
Gold Phone and Mobile Service Blasted as Latest 'Trump Family Profiteering'
Technology 17. Juni 2025, 18:511
-