YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content. Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"
-
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 17:22 zuletzt editiert vonThis post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 17:27 zuletzt editiert von
If only half of that leniency were granted to selfhosting tools and adblockers
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 17:37 zuletzt editiert von
This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 17:55 zuletzt editiert von
They opened their doors to the goose stepping. Fucking corporate shitheads.
-
This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 18:01 zuletzt editiert von bimbimboy@lemm.ee 6. Nov. 2025, 20:01yes, surprising a total of 0 people.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 18:26 zuletzt editiert von
This is such bad news. I'm sympathetic to content creators who have to step on eggshells to please the algorithm/advertisers... But this?
Yeah, this is not that. We all know who this is for.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 18:29 zuletzt editiert von
They really are killin' everything, aren't they...
-
This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 18:41 zuletzt editiert vonI assume you mean fascist propaganda over and above the right wing rabbit holes that already exist on YouTube….
Ugh, this is terrible.
-
This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 18:46 zuletzt editiert vonWell yes. You obviously still can’t say “le dollar bean” without getting nuked from orbit. YouTube is a goodly Christian corporation after all, can’t have such content.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 18:48 zuletzt editiert von
Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"
oh it's that easy huh. why didn't we think of this before lol.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 18:56 zuletzt editiert von
Do people still have to say unalive?
Censorship is goddamn stupid.
They should just tag content & let people decide what to filter. -
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 19:05 zuletzt editiert von
I'm gessing that's not gonna positively impact the people i watch and instead go towards some dumb shits.
-
This is just going to be used to allow fascist propaganda, isn't it?
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 20:04 zuletzt editiert vonAnd still block curse words and specific terms. Fuck this place
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 20:29 zuletzt editiert von
"Muh
freedumsprofit" outweighs life. The silent bit spoken aloud. Cool cool.As expected from this timeline and this garbage conglomerate.
-
Do people still have to say unalive?
Censorship is goddamn stupid.
They should just tag content & let people decide what to filter.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 20:57 zuletzt editiert vonI'm going to start using "inhumed".
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:07 zuletzt editiert von propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 6. Nov. 2025, 23:10
Good. I don't really care about youtube, but less censorship is always a good thing.
How can you people say you respect science when you support silencing any criticism of it? That's not science. That's religion.
That said, this criteria clearly only exists to protect "influencers" who make youtube a proportional amount of money. If you have a channel with very little traffic and you say something controversial, you'd better believe your "freedom of expression value" will not be high enough to outweigh the corporation's perceived "harm risk."
-
And still block curse words and specific terms. Fuck this place
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:12 zuletzt editiert vonFuck this place
Are you implying you don't use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?
Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:14 zuletzt editiert von
Can we talk about adblockers, or is that still somehow worse than nazi shit?
Btw they removed a popular Youtuber's "Degoogle Your Life" series lmfao (Linus Tech Tips). But a far-right thinnly-veiled racist video? All a'okay according to Google.
-
Fuck this place
Are you implying you don't use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?
Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:24 zuletzt editiert vonPersonally I don't use YouTube the website at all at this point. I'm 100℅ Freetube and yt-dlp/Plex for watching the channels I like.
-
Fuck this place
Are you implying you don't use YT at all? Or you use it and choose to be unhappy with it?
Just curious, I often get mad because they need to censor words, but not to the degrees to say 'fuck this place" and move to the other (unborn) alternative.
schrieb am 11. Juni 2025, 21:41 zuletzt editiert vonThe alternatives are there. They don't have the volume of course, but they're very much born...
-
The AI company Perplexity is complaining their bots can't bypass Cloudflare's firewall
Technology vor 13 Stunden
1
-
Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
Technology67 vor 11 Tagenvor 14 Tagen
1
-
Debian 13.0 Ready To Introduce Formal RISC-V Support (But Still Bound By Slow Hardware)
Technology67 vor 29 Tagenvor 29 Tagen
1
-
Denmark to tackle deepfakes by giving people copyright to their own features
Technology 27. Juni 2025, 06:53
1
-
-
Artificial intelligence threatens to raid the water reserves of Europe's driest regions
Technology 16. Juni 2025, 17:11
1
-
-