Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content. Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"

YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content. Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"

Technology
67 48 15
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • D

    Samsung phones can survive twice as many charges as Pixel and iPhone, according to EU data

    Technology technology
    114
    1
    538 Stimmen
    114 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    N
    Idk, dying 15 years ago kind of seems genius today.
  • P

    A Win for Fair Use Is a Win for Libraries: Recent legal decision has reaffirmed the power of fair use in the digital age, and it’s a big win for libraries and the future of public access to knowledge

    Technology technology
    8
    172 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    S
    I wouldn't go quite as far. This is just breacrumbs falling of the corporate table.
  • P

    The BBC is launching a paywall in the US

    Technology technology
    67
    283 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    90 Aufrufe
    C
    Yeah back in the day we made sure no matter who you were and what was going on you had the opportunity to hear our take on it Mind you I suppose that still happens thanks to us being a very loud and online people, but having an "America says x" channel in a time where people liked us sure was a good idea
  • P

    AI search finds publishers starved of referral traffic

    Technology technology
    38
    1
    117 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    88 Aufrufe
    alk@sh.itjust.worksA
    They really do! It's nice to read something that's clearly hand crafted and high quality, especially the big news roundups that you do, as opposed to the usual SEO slop most news sites have. It's a treat every time a new one comes out.
  • H

    Ads on YouTube

    Technology technology
    47
    30 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    K
    this is like a soulless manager or some ai bot trying to figure why the human brain hates terrible interruptions
  • D

    Iran asks its people to delete WhatsApp from their devices

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • D

    The largest cryptocurrency money-laundering ring

    Technology technology
    26
    326 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    80 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    It has their name and where it came from so. Yes? That's not what I asked. Are you expecting people to direct link everything even when it is already atributed? I mean is that really too much to expect of people? To simply copy the link where they found the information and post it along with where they shared it?
  • P

    The European Commission says it is investigating Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos for potential child safety Digital Services Act (DSA) violations “as a matter of priority”

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?