Skip to content

Half of companies planning to replace customer service with AI are reversing course

Technology
179 102 150
  • 33 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    T
    This is such a depressing read. So fucked up. How can people be this evil? I'm glad this has become illegal, but I'm sad it even had to be in the first place.
  • 208 Stimmen
    63 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    F
    They're coming for our VPNs soon enough, be sure of that. Here in Australia they've already flagged wanting to ban them.
  • Patreon will increase the cut it takes from new creators

    Technology technology
    29
    150 Stimmen
    29 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    F
    Not growing at an absurd rate doesn’t mean their business model is stagnating.
  • 93 Stimmen
    35 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    D
    Same as American companies. Send you targeted ads and news articles to influence your world view as a form of new soft power.
  • The AI girlfriend guy - The Paranoia Of The AI Era

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    6 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 6 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    T
    Oh I agree. I just think is part of the equation perhaps the thinner and lighter will enable for better processor? Not an AR guy , although I lived my oculus until FB got hold of it. Didn't use it ever again after that day.
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.
  • 149 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    C
    Got it, at that point (extremely high voltage) you'd need suppression at the panel. Which I would hope people have inline, but not expect like an LVD.