Salt Lake City, plans to implement AI-assisted 911 call triaging to handle ~30% of about 450K non-emergency calls per year
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 00:13 zuletzt editiert von
Saly lake city Residents, shouldn't be paying taxes then.
-
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 00:23 zuletzt editiert von
I would say there's a failure in the body responsible for hiring and paying people to answer emergency calls. The only reason there is a shortage is because they are under paying employees. So yes, but AI, like everywhere else it's been implemented, will fall short of what's needed and will ultimately cost more financially, with the exception that in this case, lives could also be lost.
There's without a doubt a problem, but AI isn't the solution.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 00:28 zuletzt editiert von
People will inevitably die as a result of this change. Call your representatives
-
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 00:37 zuletzt editiert von
it might detect those elevated stress levels [for callers] and it will automatically default going to a human being
Damn. I get ice cold emotionless during an emergency, going straight to the point of reciting location and event when calling 911. Now I will have to also remember in the back of my mind to throw in a wavering voice and a couple of shrieks maybe to have my call routed properly. What a future.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 00:42 zuletzt editiert von throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
"I said this like 3 time already! Get me to the hospital for fucks sake, I'm gonna die in this situation if y'all don't send someone soon..."
AI: "Understood, 'Hostage Situation'. Sending a SWAT Team..."
-
"To better assist you please describe the nature of your emergency...... Let's try this again. To better assist..."
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 00:44 zuletzt editiert vonMeanwhile grandma is stroking out and you can't get passed the first branch in a call tree
-
Right there in your quote it says the AI would only interact with nonemergency calls. You said the system would reroute nonemergency calls.
So when a call comes in to 911, who picks up? A person or an AI?
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 02:24 zuletzt editiert vonYou said my comment conflicts with the article. In what way? What does the article say happens?
-
I would say there's a failure in the body responsible for hiring and paying people to answer emergency calls. The only reason there is a shortage is because they are under paying employees. So yes, but AI, like everywhere else it's been implemented, will fall short of what's needed and will ultimately cost more financially, with the exception that in this case, lives could also be lost.
There's without a doubt a problem, but AI isn't the solution.
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 02:27 zuletzt editiert vonThere's without a doubt a problem, but AI isn't the solution.
Unless it literally is. Do you know that it won't be? What other example do you have to base your assertion on?
-
People will inevitably die as a result of this change. Call your representatives
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 02:32 zuletzt editiert vonPeople with protection detail and staff don't need 911.
-
There's without a doubt a problem, but AI isn't the solution.
Unless it literally is. Do you know that it won't be? What other example do you have to base your assertion on?
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 02:33 zuletzt editiert vonI'm not going to argue with you. AI blows. There are article out there about companies hiring people back after going to AI. It really is a snake oil product that corporations have gobbled up. It's got it's use cases as a tool, but not as a human replacement, especially in matters of live and death.
You can look up and research some articles of you want, or don't. Clearly your opinion on the matter is not popular, and that could be some hive mind, or it could be because everyone else sees the problems that you don't.
Putting a system in place that can't actually think at all and have it try and comprehend what is or is not an emergency, to me, is a terrible idea, and doomed to fail. Take that as you will, I won't be following up with anything else. You can have the final word if you want, because I just can't be bothered to care.
-
A young person died in my youth crisis shelter because instead of getting 911, I was first redirected to a semi-literate moron working in a VOIP "call center". Her Southern Alabama drawl was so severe I could not even recognize she was speaking English at first. This "call center" was also "experiencing higher than normal call volumes".
Last week I was driving by a wooden apartment complex and I noticed that somebody's unattended barbecue had gone poof and the balcony was burning. I called 911 and it took 4 minutes to get directed to the fire department.
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 03:09 zuletzt editiert vonI'm dumbfounded. I'd be furious if it took more than 20 seconds
-
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 03:36 zuletzt editiert von
The one thing you forgot is that you are on Lemme. So of course everybody wants to be upset about AI. That's like par for the course.
-
I think the non-emergency number should be heavily advertised. I have no idea what the local one for me is (if it even exists)
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 03:40 zuletzt editiert vonMaybe they need to send something out to residents every six months or something, letting them know about the non-emergency number because I have this exact same issue. I've lived here for three years and have no idea if a non-emergency number even exists. It probably does. I just haven't looked it up because I haven't even thought about it.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 04:55 zuletzt editiert von
Imagine your chatbot hallucinating as it tries to assist you in your life and death critical situation.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 05:28 zuletzt editiert von
I wonder how many hundreds of millions of dollars they've set aside for settlements.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 05:52 zuletzt editiert von
How many more people could they hire to take these for the same price they are paying open ai?
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 06:19 zuletzt editiert von
Oh you want to talk directly to a person? You need to subscribe to 911+. For only $4.99 a month, you get the following perks...
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 06:48 zuletzt editiert von
I’m sorry Dave, I can’t do that
-
I’m sorry Dave, I can’t do that
schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 06:57 zuletzt editiert von -
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 15. Juni 2025, 09:09 zuletzt editiert von
Customer support is annoying or whatever but this is horrifying. Several people will die because of this.
-
-
Palantir accuses British doctors of choosing ‘ideology over patient interest’
Technology 8. Juli 2025, 19:011
-
The $10 billion delivery empire built on Shein and TikTok orders: A Chinese courier company is out-delivering Amazon — and everyone else — across Southeast Asia.
Technology 20. Juni 2025, 11:561
-
Republican National Convention Sued for Sending Unhinged Text Messages Soliciting Donations to Donald Trump’s Campaign and Continuing to Text Even After Trying to Unsubscribe.
Technology 16. Juni 2025, 17:481
-
-
DeepSeek's distilled new R1 AI model can run on a single GPU | TechCrunch
Technology 29. Mai 2025, 23:411
-
Spread of sexual deepfake images created by generative AI growing in Japan
Technology 29. Mai 2025, 15:241
-
Tesla confirms it has given up on its Cybertruck range extender to achieve promised range
Technology 8. Mai 2025, 06:521