Skip to content

Is Google about to destroy the web?

Technology
65 37 1.2k

27/65

15. Juni 2025, 06:59


  • 10 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    This video complements the text tutorial at https://trevors-tutorials.com/0004-creating-your-first-game-with-ebitengine/ Trevors-Tutorials.com is where you can find free programming tutorials. The focus is on Go and Ebitengine game development. Watch the channel introduction for more info.
  • 10 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 55 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    65 Aufrufe
    Oracle?! You have money and power and everyone hanging on you and you chose ORACLE?! How can anyone take this seriously?!
  • 772 Stimmen
    205 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    Gemini is just a web replacement protocol. With basic things we remember from olden days Web, but with everything non-essential removed, for a client to be doable in a couple of days. I have my own Gemini viewer, LOL. This for me seems a completely different application from torrents. I was dreaming for a thing similar to torrent trackers for aggregating storage and computation and indexing and search, with search and aggregation and other services' responses being structured and standardized, and cryptographic identities, and some kind of market services to sell and buy storage and computation in unified and pooled, but transparent way (scripted by buyer\seller), similar to MMORPG markets, with the representation (what is a siloed service in modern web) being on the client native application, and those services allowing to build any kind of client-server huge system on them, that being global. But that's more of a global Facebook\Usenet\whatever, a killer of platforms. Their infrastructure is internal, while their representation is public on the Internet. I want to make infrastructure public on the Internet, and representation client-side, sharing it for many kinds of applications. Adding another layer to the OSI model, so to say, between transport and application layer. For this application: I think you could have some kind of Kademlia-based p2p with groups voluntarily joined (involving very huge groups) where nodes store replicas of partitions of group common data based on their pseudo-random identifiers and/or some kind of ring built from those identifiers, to balance storage and resilience. If a group has a creator, then you can have replication factor propagated signed by them, and membership too signed by them. But if having a creator (even with cryptographically delegated decisions) and propagating changes by them is not ok, then maybe just using whole data hash, or it's bittorrent-like info tree hash, as namespace with peers freely joining it can do. Then it may be better to partition not by parts of the whole piece, but by info tree? I guess making it exactly bittorrent-like is not a good idea, rather some kind of block tree, like for a filesystem, and a separate piece of information to lookup which file is in which blocks. If we are doing directory structure. Then, with freely joining it, there's no need in any owners or replication factors, I guess just pseudorandom distribution of hashes will do, and each node storing first partitions closest to its hash. Now thinking about it, such a system would be not that different from bittorrent and can even be interoperable with it. There's the issue of updates, yes, hence I've started with groups having hierarchy of creators, who can make or accept those updates. Having that and the ability to gradually store one group's data to another group, it should be possible to do forks of a certain state. But that line of thought makes reusing bittorrent only possible for part of the system. The whole database is guaranteed to be more than a normal HDD (1 TB? I dunno). Absolutely guaranteed, no doubt at all. 1 TB (for example) would be someone's collection of favorite stuff, and not too rich one.
  • Programming languages

    Technology technology 5. Juni 2025, 16:33
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 133 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    Indeed I did not, we’re at a stalemate because you and I do not believe what the other is saying! So we can’t move anywhere since it’s two walls. Buuuut Tim Apple got my back for once, just saw this now!: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/27197259 I’ll leave it at that, as thanks to that white paper I win! Yay internet points!
  • The Internet of Consent

    Technology technology 30. Mai 2025, 09:38
    1
    11 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The bots are among us.

    Technology technology 9. Jan. 2025, 17:48
    2
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    Yeah she was on to something with the layers, but screw it up. I’m sure the models got better since.