Skip to content

Is Google about to destroy the web?

Technology
65 37 232
  • How Cops Can Get Your Private Online Data

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    107 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    M
    Private and online doesn't mix. Except if it's encrypted.
  • You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

    Technology technology
    298
    1
    838 Stimmen
    298 Beiträge
    899 Aufrufe
    M
    My understanding is that, in broad strokes... Aurora acts like a proxy or mirror that doesn't require you to sign in to get Google Play Store apps. It doesn't provide any other software besides what you specifically download from it, and it doesn't include any telemetry/tracking like normal Google Play Store would. microG is a reimplementation of Google Play services (the suite of proprietary background services that Google runs on normal Android phones). MicroG doesn't have the bloat and tracking and other closed source functionality, but rather acts as a stand-in that other apps can talk to (when they'd normally be talking to Google Play services). This has to be installed and configured and I would refer to the microG github or other documentation. GrapheneOS has its own sandboxed Google Play Services which is basically unmodified Google Play Services, crammed into its own sandbox with no special permissions, and a compatibility layer that retains some functionality while keeping it from being able to access app data with high level permissions like it would normally do on a vanilla Android phone.
  • 778 Stimmen
    396 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org5
    You are more than welcome to cite the actual Geneva convention to show where I'm wrong.
  • 692 Stimmen
    140 Beiträge
    196 Aufrufe
    H
    Maybe I don't want you to stop, big boy.
  • 241 Stimmen
    175 Beiträge
    367 Aufrufe
    N
    I think a generic plug would be great but look at how fragmented USB specifications are. Add that to biology and it's a whole other level of difficulty. Brain implants have great potential but the abandonment issue is a problem that exists now that we have to solve for. It's also not really a tech issue but a societal one on affordability and accountability of medical research. Imagine if a company held the patents for the brain device and just closed down without selling or leasing the patent. People with that device would have no support unless a government body forced the release of the patent. This has already happened multiple times to people in clinical trials and scaling up deployment with multiple versions will make the situation worse. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2818077 I don't really have a take on your personal desires. I do think if anyone can afford one they should make sure it's not just the up front cost but also the long term costs to be considered. Like buying an expensive car, it's not if you can afford to purchase it but if you can afford to wreck it.
  • 81 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    P
    I expect them to give shareholders and directors a haircut before laying off workers, yes. But we know Microsoft never does that, so they can go f themselves.
  • Things at Tesla are worse than they appear

    Technology technology
    34
    1
    420 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    117 Aufrufe
    halcyon@discuss.tchncs.deH
    [image: a4f3b70f-db20-4c1d-b737-611548cf3104.jpeg]
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet