X.com blocks access to Ekrem Imamoglu, leader of Turkey political opposition
-
Criminal charges was probably the wrong word, but that’s being pedantic. The company operates in Turkey and allows Turkish people to use the product, so they have to follow Turkish laws. The Turkish government can file legal charges against them for failure to comply. Same with any fediverse instance owners - they would either have to block their instance from all Turkish users, or comply.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:02 zuletzt editiert vonthat’s being pedantic
It's not. At all.
they would either have to block their instance from all Turkish users, or comply.
No, they wouldn't. Once again, Turkey has no authority over people and servers not located in their jurisdiction.
-
You don’t seem to understand how the legal system and governments work.
They issued a legal request to censor his account in Turkey. Failure to do so would result in severe consequences for X, such as having to take X offline for all of Turkey.
X complied with the law and are challenging the censorship request in court, the only place that has the power to overrule the government.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:04 zuletzt editiert vonYou don’t seem to understand how the legal system and governments work.
I am not a lawyer but I do understand how jurisdictions work. Elon is not in theirs.
Failure to do so would result in severe consequences for X, such as having to take X offline for all of Turkey.
If he were a "free speech absolutist" as he claims, he would let them.
You didn't answer my question.
-
that’s being pedantic
It's not. At all.
they would either have to block their instance from all Turkish users, or comply.
No, they wouldn't. Once again, Turkey has no authority over people and servers not located in their jurisdiction.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:12 zuletzt editiert vonThe Turkish government has legal authority over companies that are serving their citizens.
Why do you think the GDPR laws were such a big deal even outside of the UK?
-
You don’t seem to understand how the legal system and governments work.
I am not a lawyer but I do understand how jurisdictions work. Elon is not in theirs.
Failure to do so would result in severe consequences for X, such as having to take X offline for all of Turkey.
If he were a "free speech absolutist" as he claims, he would let them.
You didn't answer my question.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:13 zuletzt editiert vonElon isn’t. X is.
I did answer your question. Last paragraph.
-
The Turkish government has legal authority over companies that are serving their citizens.
Why do you think the GDPR laws were such a big deal even outside of the UK?
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:27 zuletzt editiert vonThe Turkish government has legal authority over companies that are serving their citizens.
No. They don't. You can keep repeating this non-sense but it's simply untrue.
-
The Turkish government has legal authority over companies that are serving their citizens.
No. They don't. You can keep repeating this non-sense but it's simply untrue.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:29 zuletzt editiert vonYou don’t think companies that operate in Turkey for Turkish citizens have to follow any Turkish laws?
Again - GDPR.
-
Elon isn’t. X is.
I did answer your question. Last paragraph.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:29 zuletzt editiert vonX is.
No it is not. Twitter is a US company with US servers. If you want to argue that the US is now a territory of Turkey, please cite a source.
I did answer your question.
No you didn't.
-
X is.
No it is not. Twitter is a US company with US servers. If you want to argue that the US is now a territory of Turkey, please cite a source.
I did answer your question.
No you didn't.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:33 zuletzt editiert vonX operates in Turkey by giving Turkish users access to the site. They either follow Turkish law or they don’t serve Turkish residents.
They can of course fight any legal requests by the Turkish government - and oh look! They are!
-
You don’t think companies that operate in Turkey for Turkish citizens have to follow any Turkish laws?
Again - GDPR.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:34 zuletzt editiert vonYou don’t think companies that operate in Turkey
Lemmy is not a company and the users and servers located outside of Turkey are not subject to the jurisdiction of Turkey.
If you're just going to repeat the same non-sense over and over without any evidence I'm going to block you.
-
You don’t think companies that operate in Turkey
Lemmy is not a company and the users and servers located outside of Turkey are not subject to the jurisdiction of Turkey.
If you're just going to repeat the same non-sense over and over without any evidence I'm going to block you.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 22:39 zuletzt editiert vonWhen a Lemmy instance owner gets a legal request from a foreign countries government to take down content, after they’re done shitting themselves they’ll take the content down or they’ll have to implement a country wide block on that country, along with not allowing any citizens of that country to use their instance no matter where they are located.
Block me, I don’t care. You’re just proving that you can’t handle the truth and being challenged with it.
-
SEC says it will deregulate cryptocurrencies with 'Project Crypto'
Technology77 vor 14 Tagenvor 18 Tagen1
-
-
The Astronomer CEO's Coldplay Concert Fiasco Is Emblematic of Our Social Media Surveillance Dystopia
Technology77 vor 28 Tagen19. Juli 2025, 18:021
-
-
-
$219 Springer Nature book "Mastering Machine Learning: From Basics to Advanced" was written with a chatbot
Technology 2. Juli 2025, 02:391
-
Against AI: An Open Letter From Writers to Penguin Random House, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, Hachette Book Group, Macmillan, and all other publishers of America
Technology 28. Juni 2025, 23:551
-
Supreme Court (SCOTUS) upholds a Texas law that requires porn websites to verify that their visitors are 18 or older, rejecting a First Amendment challenge to the law
Technology 27. Juni 2025, 16:151