Skip to content

As someone who has developed several #ActivityPub software implementations ([Fedify], [Hollo], [BotKit], and [Hackers' Pub]), I believe one of the most frustrating features to implement in the #fediverse is #custom_emoji.

ActivityPub Test Kategorie
43 9 476
  • What drew you to ActivityPub?

    ActivityPub activitypub dotsocial blogs
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    > Getting a critical mass of people to create yet another account was always a major obstacle. I see and have experienced this effect time and time again, and we're getting closer and closer to the point where the protocol implementations can abstract away the messy bits. Gaining critical mass among devs is the first step!
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    dfyx@social.helios42.de because followers and outbox collections can be faked.
  • Voting in the threadiverse

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie fediverse
    18
    1
    0 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    95 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    snoopy@jlai.lu personally, since I create AP enabled software I am on the side of votes being public data. We already have enough issues with votes being out of sync with each other. Mixing in private voting is just asking for trouble. Emoji reactions are neat, although niche to those softwares that utilise it. They allow for greater expression which is nice. They're useless for deriving value (for ranking purposes) unless you assign value to them.
  • 0 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    237 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    PewDiePie built his fame and fortune on a centralized platform. I am not certain whether he will see the benefit of a decentralized future beyond dollar signs. Happy to be proven wrong.
  • Pixelfed Uptick in Monthly Active Users

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie fediverse
    20
    1
    0 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    242 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    I would say that Pixelfed is closer to the microblog space than it is the threaded discussion space. It's essentially microblogging except with an image media focus (or video, in the case of Loops.) To each their own, some people communicate better using pictures, some better over short text, some better over long-form text. There's a space for them all
  • Organizers Log:

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie deso fedicon fediorigami fediverse
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    73 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    reiver@mastodon.social that's the first time I've seen the FediOrigami logo, looks neat!
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    532 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
  • NodeBB - ActivityPub

    NodeBB nodebb linux fediverse
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    129 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet