jsit@social.coop Ghost? NodeBB? Just to name a couple

rwg@aoir.social I'm not actually sure! You'll have to ask reiver@mastodon.social about that one. Let me know too!

reiver@mastodon.social rainer@socialbc.ca we're (NodeBB) Canadian! Let's make it happen, easy to consume RSS feeds to pipe to an install of NodeBB and publish to the fediverse. We'd be open to sponsoring the hosting of it for a year or more. Let's talk.

Man!!! That screenshot takes me back..

I suppose you're right in a way. The context owner is not supposed to be set by someone other than the context owner. It's a fallback mechanism intended for better compatibility with Mastodon. When a group is addressed and it is one of the local NodeBB categories, it will assume control If it is another group that it knows about but isn't same origin to the author, then no category is assumed.

@mastodonmigration@mastodon.online while this is a known workaround, I don't think it's a tenable long-term solution. You can have "real decentralization" without the quirks, too.

@trwnh@mastodon.social yes, it is in regards to audience no longer being sent out by Lemmy. While it's defined in 1b12 it seems to be ancillary now, so updating that property would mean Lemmy would need to add support for it back.. not the end of the world.

@miaq@flipboard.social @jerry@infosec.exchange for sure, just look at the number of instances spanning multiple software!