Skip to content

Switzerland plans surveillance worse than US

Technology
90 60 620
  • I Have Found the Best IPTV Service in 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 378 Stimmen
    85 Beiträge
    435 Aufrufe
    cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zoneC
    hey belgium your waffles suck
  • 631 Stimmen
    49 Beiträge
    558 Aufrufe
    jabjoe@feddit.ukJ
    They should be being sued for doing anti repair tricks. The guys exposing the anti repair tricks are the heroes here.
  • Best BPO Company in UK

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Palantir partners to develop AI software for nuclear construction

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • YouTube is getting more AI.

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    38 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    101 Aufrufe
    E
    Yaaaaay! Said no one.
  • No JS, No CSS, No HTML: online "clubs" celebrate plainer websites

    Technology technology
    205
    2
    772 Stimmen
    205 Beiträge
    7k Aufrufe
    R
    Gemini is just a web replacement protocol. With basic things we remember from olden days Web, but with everything non-essential removed, for a client to be doable in a couple of days. I have my own Gemini viewer, LOL. This for me seems a completely different application from torrents. I was dreaming for a thing similar to torrent trackers for aggregating storage and computation and indexing and search, with search and aggregation and other services' responses being structured and standardized, and cryptographic identities, and some kind of market services to sell and buy storage and computation in unified and pooled, but transparent way (scripted by buyer\seller), similar to MMORPG markets, with the representation (what is a siloed service in modern web) being on the client native application, and those services allowing to build any kind of client-server huge system on them, that being global. But that's more of a global Facebook\Usenet\whatever, a killer of platforms. Their infrastructure is internal, while their representation is public on the Internet. I want to make infrastructure public on the Internet, and representation client-side, sharing it for many kinds of applications. Adding another layer to the OSI model, so to say, between transport and application layer. For this application: I think you could have some kind of Kademlia-based p2p with groups voluntarily joined (involving very huge groups) where nodes store replicas of partitions of group common data based on their pseudo-random identifiers and/or some kind of ring built from those identifiers, to balance storage and resilience. If a group has a creator, then you can have replication factor propagated signed by them, and membership too signed by them. But if having a creator (even with cryptographically delegated decisions) and propagating changes by them is not ok, then maybe just using whole data hash, or it's bittorrent-like info tree hash, as namespace with peers freely joining it can do. Then it may be better to partition not by parts of the whole piece, but by info tree? I guess making it exactly bittorrent-like is not a good idea, rather some kind of block tree, like for a filesystem, and a separate piece of information to lookup which file is in which blocks. If we are doing directory structure. Then, with freely joining it, there's no need in any owners or replication factors, I guess just pseudorandom distribution of hashes will do, and each node storing first partitions closest to its hash. Now thinking about it, such a system would be not that different from bittorrent and can even be interoperable with it. There's the issue of updates, yes, hence I've started with groups having hierarchy of creators, who can make or accept those updates. Having that and the ability to gradually store one group's data to another group, it should be possible to do forks of a certain state. But that line of thought makes reusing bittorrent only possible for part of the system. The whole database is guaranteed to be more than a normal HDD (1 TB? I dunno). Absolutely guaranteed, no doubt at all. 1 TB (for example) would be someone's collection of favorite stuff, and not too rich one.
  • 45 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    76 Aufrufe
    S
    I still get calls, but I can't see details (e.g. just the phone number, not the caller).