Minnesota Shooting Suspect Allegedly Used Data Broker Sites to Find Targets’ Addresses
Technology
75
Beiträge
56
Kommentatoren
1.2k
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 05:29 zuletzt editiert von
If they own houses that is public info.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 05:42 zuletzt editiert von
The suspect faces several charges of second-degree murder.
This baffles me. Looking up your fucking victim's addresses isn't enough evidence of premeditation to qualify for first-degree charges?
-
The suspect faces several charges of second-degree murder.
This baffles me. Looking up your fucking victim's addresses isn't enough evidence of premeditation to qualify for first-degree charges?
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 05:51 zuletzt editiert vonIn Minnesota, a grand jury is required for first degree. This is just a placeholder charge until they can get a jury.
-
The suspect faces several charges of second-degree murder.
This baffles me. Looking up your fucking victim's addresses isn't enough evidence of premeditation to qualify for first-degree charges?
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 05:52 zuletzt editiert vonHe's white.
-
If they own houses that is public info.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 05:53 zuletzt editiert vonWhile true, the lookup is the address to the owner, not the other way around. Compiling the information to show querying by person should be illegal.
-
If they own houses that is public info.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 06:34 zuletzt editiert vonYou can find out someone's home address from their email address. These brokers are out of control.
-
The suspect faces several charges of second-degree murder.
This baffles me. Looking up your fucking victim's addresses isn't enough evidence of premeditation to qualify for first-degree charges?
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 06:42 zuletzt editiert vonIf he was left-wing, this would be prosecuted (and propagandized by the media) as terrorism.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 06:54 zuletzt editiert von
The last major American privacy law, the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act was passed in 1988 by Reagan. The only reason it happened is that politicians realized that their privacy was affected. Robert Bork was going through his Supreme Court confirmation hearings and someone got a hold of the tapes he had rented and published them.
Politicians were worried about their own personal privacy, so they passed a new law to protect the privacy of people's video tape rentals.
Maybe the fact that the targets here were politicians will mean that something will happen with data privacy, for once.
-
While true, the lookup is the address to the owner, not the other way around. Compiling the information to show querying by person should be illegal.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 07:29 zuletzt editiert vonBut did you think about the shareholders
-
The last major American privacy law, the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act was passed in 1988 by Reagan. The only reason it happened is that politicians realized that their privacy was affected. Robert Bork was going through his Supreme Court confirmation hearings and someone got a hold of the tapes he had rented and published them.
Politicians were worried about their own personal privacy, so they passed a new law to protect the privacy of people's video tape rentals.
Maybe the fact that the targets here were politicians will mean that something will happen with data privacy, for once.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 07:35 zuletzt editiert vonProbably not.
-
If he was left-wing, this would be prosecuted (and propagandized by the media) as terrorism.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 07:36 zuletzt editiert vonWhich, funnily enough, would also qualify the murders as first-degree under Minnesota state law: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.185
-
In Minnesota, a grand jury is required for first degree. This is just a placeholder charge until they can get a jury.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 07:38 zuletzt editiert vonThat's what I figured after thinking about it, that there had to be some procedural reason for it.
-
If he was left-wing, this would be prosecuted (and propagandized by the media) as terrorism.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 07:56 zuletzt editiert vonhe wouldve been charged already, much like with mr luigi was. since he targeted the protected ":class"
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 08:19 zuletzt editiert von ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
There is no allegedly, the dude was a total boomer and literally wrote out instructions on how to dox someone in his notebook which are shown in the federal complaint against him
Literally outlines which sites are free, which ones have free trials, etc
Like you you would think he would just use a text document or bookmarks or something
-
There is no allegedly, the dude was a total boomer and literally wrote out instructions on how to dox someone in his notebook which are shown in the federal complaint against him
Literally outlines which sites are free, which ones have free trials, etc
Like you you would think he would just use a text document or bookmarks or something
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 09:03 zuletzt editiert vonWell considering he chose to use a pyro-mechanical firearm, instead of things like social/political/legal/economical tools to accomplish his goal, seems to check out lol
-
The last major American privacy law, the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act was passed in 1988 by Reagan. The only reason it happened is that politicians realized that their privacy was affected. Robert Bork was going through his Supreme Court confirmation hearings and someone got a hold of the tapes he had rented and published them.
Politicians were worried about their own personal privacy, so they passed a new law to protect the privacy of people's video tape rentals.
Maybe the fact that the targets here were politicians will mean that something will happen with data privacy, for once.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 09:14 zuletzt editiert vonThey'll pass a law that only benefits them. Our data will still all be up for grabs.
-
You can find out someone's home address from their email address. These brokers are out of control.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 09:16 zuletzt editiert vonIt's insane how many there are. I've been using Experian to find and remove my info from these sites and there are literally hundreds it's done so far.
-
The last major American privacy law, the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act was passed in 1988 by Reagan. The only reason it happened is that politicians realized that their privacy was affected. Robert Bork was going through his Supreme Court confirmation hearings and someone got a hold of the tapes he had rented and published them.
Politicians were worried about their own personal privacy, so they passed a new law to protect the privacy of people's video tape rentals.
Maybe the fact that the targets here were politicians will mean that something will happen with data privacy, for once.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 09:33 zuletzt editiert vonNever heard that story before.
-
It's insane how many there are. I've been using Experian to find and remove my info from these sites and there are literally hundreds it's done so far.
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 10:47 zuletzt editiert vonI guarantee you none of your data is actually deleted. Experian is a surveillance capitalism data broker. They're selling both the virus and the snake oil to "cure" it.
-
schrieb am 17. Juni 2025, 10:48 zuletzt editiert von
Just like he did with the eggs!
