Skip to content

Twitter in EU and UK

Technology
34 26 345
  • 80 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    Couldn't asocial media just having them not visible to others but not telling them? Because if they block them, they just create another account or move somewhere else.
  • Tech bug keeps Mazda radios locked in to NPR

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    2 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    R
    Article from 2022
  • 622 Stimmen
    143 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    spicedealer@lemmy.dbzer0.comS
    Couldn't agree more.
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    574 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Seven Goldfish

    Technology technology
    1
    5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 15 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 35 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    42 Aufrufe
    T
    On the one hand, this is possibly dubious in that things that aren't generally considered to be part of defence will be used to inflate our defence spending numbers without actually spending more than previous (i.e. it's just a PR move) But on the other hand, this could be immensely useful in telling the NIMBYs to fuck right off. What's that, you're opposing infrastructure improvements, new housing, or wind turbines? Aw, diddums, that's too bad. This is deemed critical for national security, and thus the government can give it approval regardless. Sorry Bernard, sorry Mary, your petition against any change in the area is going nowhere.
  • Spyware and state abuse: The case for an EU-wide ban

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    54 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    M
    I'm surprised it isn't already illegal to install software on someone's phone without their consent or knowledge. Sounds like a form of property damage.