Elon Musk wants to rewrite "the entire corpus of human knowledge" with Grok
Technology
199
Beiträge
159
Kommentatoren
4.7k
Aufrufe
-
asdf
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:06 zuletzt editiert vonWikipedia gives lists of their sources, judge what you read based off of that. Or just skip to the sources and read them instead.
-
Elon should seriously see a medical professional.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:12 zuletzt editiert vonI'll have you know he's seeing a medical professional at least once a day. Sometimes multiple times!!!!
(On an absolutely and completely unrelated note ketamine dealers are medical professionals, yeah?)
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:16 zuletzt editiert voni'll allow it so long as grok acknowledges that musk was made rich from inherited wealth that was created using an apartheid emerald mine.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:18 zuletzt editiert vonI'm sure the second Grok in the human centipede will find that very nutritious.
If you use that Grok, you'll be third in the centipede. Enjoy.
-
Wikipedia gives lists of their sources, judge what you read based off of that. Or just skip to the sources and read them instead.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:23 zuletzt editiert von aaron@infosec.pubasdf
-
adding missing information and deleting errors
Which is to say, "I'm sick of Grok accurately portraying me as an evil dipshit, so I'm going to feed it a bunch of right-wing talking points and get rid of anything that hurts my feelings."
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:33 zuletzt editiert vonThat is definitely how I read it.
History can’t just be ‘rewritten’ by A.I. and taken as truth. That’s fucking stupid.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:38 zuletzt editiert vonadvanced reasoning
If it's so advanced, it should be able to reason out that all human knowledge is standing in the shoulders of others and how errors have prompted us to explore other areas and learn things we never would have otherwise.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 09:56 zuletzt editiert vonDon't feed the trolls.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:04 zuletzt editiert von[My] translation: "I want to rewrite history to what I want".
-
Wikipedia is quite resilient - you can even put it on a USB drive. As long as you have a free operating system, there will always be ways to access it.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:19 zuletzt editiert vonI keep a partial local copy of Wikipedia on my phone and backup device with an app called Kiwix. Great if you need access to certain items in remote areas with no access to the internet.
-
Thinking wikipedia or other unbiased sources will still be available in a decade or so is wishful thinking. Once the digital stranglehold kicks in, it'll be mandatory sign-in with gov vetted identity provider and your sources will be limited to what that gov allows you to see. MMW.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:34 zuletzt editiert vonYes. There will be no websites only AI and apps. You will be automatically logged in to the apps. Linux, Lemmy will be baned. We will be classed as hackers and criminals. We probably have to build our own mesh network for communication or access it from a secret location.
-
asdf
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:35 zuletzt editiert vonWikipedia is not a trustworthy source of information for anything regarding contemporary politics or economics.
Wikipedia presents the views of reliable sources on notable topics. The trick is what sources are considered "reliable" and what topics are "notable", which is why it's such a poor source of information for things like contemporary politics in particular.
-
1.68 IQ move
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:47 zuletzt editiert vonMore like 0.7056 IQ move.
-
Guessing some kind of PR campaign that he purchased to make him look like a genius on TV and movies.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:48 zuletzt editiert vonIt took a while but in the end we found out why the internet was full of Putin and Musk's memes a few years ago.
-
We have seen from his many other comments about this, that he just wants a propaganda bot that regurgitates all of the right wing talking points. So that will definitely be easier to achieve if he does it that way.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:49 zuletzt editiert vonthat he just wants a propaganda bot that regurgitates all of the right wing talking points.
Then he has utterly failed with Grok. One of my new favorite pastimes is watching right wingers get angry that Grok won't support their most obviously counterfactual bullshit and then proceed to try to argue it into saying something they can declare a win from.
-
Wikipedia gives lists of their sources, judge what you read based off of that. Or just skip to the sources and read them instead.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 10:54 zuletzt editiert vonJust because Wikipedia offers a list of references doesn't mean that those references reflect what knowledge is actually out there. Wikipedia is trying to be academically rigorous without any of the real work. A big part of doing academic research is reading articles and studies that are wrong or which prove the null hypothesis. That's why we need experts and not just an AI to regurgitate information. Wikipedia is useful if people understand it's limitations, I think a lot of people don't though.
-
[My] translation: "I want to rewrite history to what I want".
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 11:05 zuletzt editiert vonThat was my first impression, but then it shifted into "I want my AI to be the shittiest of them all".
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 11:07 zuletzt editiert vonNot sure if has been said already. Fuck musk.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 11:13 zuletzt editiert vonElon Musk, like most pseudo intellectuals, has a very shallow understanding of things. Human knowledge is full of holes, and they cannot simply be resolved through logic, which Mush the dweeb imagines.
-
Just because Wikipedia offers a list of references doesn't mean that those references reflect what knowledge is actually out there. Wikipedia is trying to be academically rigorous without any of the real work. A big part of doing academic research is reading articles and studies that are wrong or which prove the null hypothesis. That's why we need experts and not just an AI to regurgitate information. Wikipedia is useful if people understand it's limitations, I think a lot of people don't though.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 11:18 zuletzt editiert vonFor sure, Wikipedia is for the most basic subjects to research, or the first step of doing any research (they could still offer helpful sources) . For basic stuff, or quick glances of something for conversation.
-
-
-
-
Nvidia plans to boost presence in Israel with multibillion-dollar tech campus in north
Technology199 vor 14 Tagenvor 17 Tagen
1
-
-
Playing with Hate: How Far-Right Extremists Use Minecraft to Gamify Radicalisation
Technology 2. Juli 2025, 18:01
1
-
The codes require me to put \s in the start of a list after some items are typed whereas it works just fine before putting some items in list
Technology 27. Juni 2025, 18:29
2
-
