Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. The Trump Mobile T1 Phone looks both bad and impossible

The Trump Mobile T1 Phone looks both bad and impossible

Technology
42 33 491
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • pro@programming.devP

    RushTok backlash: Why sororities aren't letting prospects post

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    32 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    P
    ...exposure to what is effectively running a small buisness under the worst possible circumstances. That is the funniest damn thing I've read in a long time, so true. It's like a zero star motel where the employees are the customers with burning man and some ted talks thrown in. If you get that into the black and manage to avoid a subpoena, you are ready to take a company public.
  • D

    AI Eroded Doctors’ Ability to Spot Cancer Within Months in Study

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • pro@programming.devP

    Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    235
    1
    1k Stimmen
    235 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    V
    What I said is that smart people can be convinced to move to another platform. Most of my friends are not technically inclined, but it was easy to make them use it, at least to chat with me. What you did is change "smart people" with "people who already want to move", which is not the same. You then said it's not something you can choose (as you cannot choose to be rich). But I answered that you can actually choose your friends. Never did I say people who are not interested in niche technologies are not smart. My statement can be rephrased in an equivalent statement "people who cannot be convinced to change are not smart", and I stand to it.
  • abnormalhumanbeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.spaceA

    Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task

    Technology technology
    37
    1
    310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    393 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • pro@programming.devP

    Microsoft Tests Removing Its Name From Bing Search Box

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    52 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    120 Aufrufe
    alphapuggle@programming.devA
    Worse. Office.com now takes me to m365.cloud.microsoft which as of today now takes me to a fucking Copilot chat window. Ofc no way to disable it because gee why would anyone want to do that?
  • D

    UK car crash expert says cars sold in Europe are so much safer than in the U.S.

    Technology technology
    10
    119 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    118 Aufrufe
    S
    Active ISA would be a disaster. My fairly modern car is unable to reliably detect posted or implied speed limits. Sometimes it overshoots by more than double and sometimes it mandates more than 3/4 slower. The problem is the way it is and will have to be done is by means of optical detection. GPS speed measurement can also be surprisingly unreliable. Especially in underground settings like long pass-unders and tunnels. If the system would be based on something reliable like local wireless communications between speed limit postings it would be a different issue - would also come with a significant risc of abuse though. Also the passive ISA was the first thing I disabled. And I abide by posted speed limits.
  • moe90@feddit.nlM

    Spread of sexual deepfake images created by generative AI growing in Japan

    Technology technology
    48
    1
    99 Stimmen
    48 Beiträge
    397 Aufrufe
    Y
    enable the absolute worst of what humanity has to offer. can we call it a reality check? we think of humans as so great and important and unique for quite a while now while the world is spiraling downwards. maybe humans arent so great after all. like what is art? ppl vibe with slob music but birds cant vote. how does that make sense? if one can watch AI slob (and we all will with the constant improvements in ai) and like it, well maybe our taste of art is not any better than what a bird can do and like. i hope LLM will lead to a breakthrough in understanding what type of animal we really are.
  • yerbouti@sh.itjust.worksY

    The bots are among us.

    Technology technology
    3
    2
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    yerbouti@sh.itjust.worksY
    Yeah she was on to something with the layers, but screw it up. I’m sure the models got better since.