Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. The Trump Mobile T1 Phone looks both bad and impossible

The Trump Mobile T1 Phone looks both bad and impossible

Technology
42 33 221
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • R

    Game Dev Fundamentals - Trevors-Tutorials.com #1

    Technology technology
    2
    5 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    R
    This video complements the text tutorial at https://trevors-tutorials.com/0001-game-dev-fundamentals/ Trevors-Tutorials.com is where you can find free programming tutorials. The focus is on Go and Ebitengine game development. Watch the channel introduction for more info.
  • clot27@lemmy.zipC

    New youtube web video player interface...?

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    8 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    eager_eagle@lemmy.worldE
    I still see the older one, that's not that different tbh
  • anilathomas@szmer.infoA

    Best BPO Company in UK

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • P

    Robot performs first realistic surgery without human help: System trained on videos of surgeries performs like an expert surgeon

    Technology technology
    113
    1
    334 Stimmen
    113 Beiträge
    691 Aufrufe
    E
    Into volunteers it's not standard practise to randomly put a chip in your head.
  • rodneyck@lemmy.dbzer0.comR

    Zero-day: Bluetooth gap turns millions of headphones into listening stations

    Technology technology
    123
    1
    528 Stimmen
    123 Beiträge
    789 Aufrufe
    B
    I'm not saying to waste space... but when manufacturers start a pissing match among themselves and say that it's because it's what the customers want, we end up with shit. Why does anyone need a screen that curves around the edge of the phone? What purpose does this serve? Who actually asked for this? I would give up some of my screen area to have forward facing speakers. I want a thicker phone that has better battery life. I also want to be able to swap out my battery. Oh, and I don't want the entire thing encased in glass. If we're so concerned about phone size then they should stop designing them so that a case is required.
  • E

    Open-Source vs Closed AI: What Businesses Must Know

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • F

    Government May Reclassify UK Broadband as Defence Spending - ISPreview UK

    Technology technology
    3
    35 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    T
    On the one hand, this is possibly dubious in that things that aren't generally considered to be part of defence will be used to inflate our defence spending numbers without actually spending more than previous (i.e. it's just a PR move) But on the other hand, this could be immensely useful in telling the NIMBYs to fuck right off. What's that, you're opposing infrastructure improvements, new housing, or wind turbines? Aw, diddums, that's too bad. This is deemed critical for national security, and thus the government can give it approval regardless. Sorry Bernard, sorry Mary, your petition against any change in the area is going nowhere.
  • deltawingdragon@sh.itjust.worksD

    Chrome using Gemini Nano for ‘Enhanced Protection’ against scams

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.