Skip to content

Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

Technology
122 78 0
  • 561 Stimmen
    215 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    they’re not precise at all unless you consider also killing their families and potentially an entire building full of people to be acceptable “precision.” No matter where you are on the scale, you could always get better (just killing the intended target) and worse (low yield nuke somewhere near the building.) The saddest part is when they calculate that the collateral damage is "beneficial" to their cause. That's the kind of calculation that tends to become more and more inaccurate over the long term.
  • How to store data on paper?

    Technology technology
    9
    44 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    U
    This has to be a shitpost. Transportation of paper-stored data You can take the sheets with you, send them by post, or even attach them to homing pigeons
  • 2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 45 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    artocode404@lemmy.dbzer0.comA
    Googlebot sad when disallowed access to 18+ videos
  • The AI girlfriend guy - The Paranoia Of The AI Era

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    7 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    S
    Saying 'don't downvote' is the flammable inflammable conundrum, both don't and do parse as do.
  • Cloudflare built an oauth provider with Claude

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    34 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    A
    I have to say that you just have to sayed something up
  • CrowdStrike Announces Layoffs Affecting 500 Employees

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    243 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    S
    This is where the magic of near meaningless corpo-babble comes in. The layoffs are part of a plan to aspirationally acheive the goal of $10b revenue by EoY 2025. What they are actually doing is a significant restructuring of the company, refocusing by outside hiring some amount of new people to lead or be a part of departments or positions that haven't existed before, or are being refocused to other priorities... ... But this process also involves laying off 500 of the 'least productive' or 'least mission critical' employees. So, technically, they can, and are, arguing that their new organizational paradigm will be so succesful that it actually will result in increased revenue, not just lower expenses. Generally corpos call this something like 'right-sizing' or 'refocusing' or something like that. ... But of course... anyone with any actual experience with working at a place that does this... will tell you roughly this is what happens: Turns out all those 'grunts' you let go of, well they actually do a lot more work in a bunch of weird, esoteric, bandaid solutions to keep everything going, than upper management was aware of... because middle management doesn't acknowledge or often even understand that that work was being done, because they are generally self-aggrandizing narcissist petty tyrants who spend more time in meetings fluffing themselves up than actually doing any useful management. Then, also, you are now bringing on new, outside people who look great on paper, to lead new or modified apartments... but they of course also do not have any institutional knowledge, as they are new. So now, you have a whole bunch of undocumented work that was being done, processes which were being followed... which is no longer being done, which is not documented.... and the new guys, even if they have the best intentions, now have to spend a quarter or two or three figuring out just exactly how much pre-existing middle management has been bullshitting about, figuring out just how much things do not actually function as they ssid it did... So now your efficiency improving restructuring is actually a chaotic mess. ... Now, this 'right sizing' is not always apocalyptically extremely bad, but it is also essentially never totally free from hiccups... and it increases stress, workload, and tensions between basically everyone at the company, to some extent. Here's Forbes explanation of this phenomenon, if you prefer an explanation of right sizing in corpospeak: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/rightsizing/
  • The bots are among us.

    Technology technology
    3
    2
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    yerbouti@sh.itjust.worksY
    Yeah she was on to something with the layers, but screw it up. I’m sure the models got better since.