Skip to content

Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

Technology
132 84 0
  • 164 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    I have like a dozen Gmail accounts, and I know plenty of others who do too. Before I owned my own domain, I used the different accounts for different things.
  • 479 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    professorchodimaccunt@sh.itjust.worksP
    GOOD lets chance of spAIyware on there
  • 2k Stimmen
    317 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    M
    I have a perfectly fine moral framework According to what? Not everyone has the same beliefs and negative attitude toward it Not everyone thinks female circumcision is bad either. for some it can even have a positive impact. Lol I don’t believe in absolutist terms. Do you absolutely believe that? While your continued failure to comprehend my initial comment is astonishing Your initial comment is indicative of somebody who hasn't thought seriously about their worldview but feels confident about critiquing others.
  • Napster/BitTorrent for machine learning?

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    27 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    G
    What would a use case look like? I assume that the latency will make it impractical to train something that's LLM-sized. But even for something small, wouldn't a data center be more efficient?
  • 216 Stimmen
    118 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    A
    Outlook has search?!
  • Google Shared My Phone Number!

    Technology technology
    45
    1
    145 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    M
    Italy, and all of Europe, have always had a greater respect for personal and a lesser respect for business' profits than the U.S.
  • 221 Stimmen
    99 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    G
    In highrises with lots of stops and users, it uses some more advanced software to schedule the optimal stops, or distribute the load between multiple lifts. A similar concept exists for HDD controllers, where the read write arm must move to different positions to load data stored on different plates and sectors, and Repositioning the head is a slow and expensive process that cuts down the data transfer rate.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.