Skip to content

Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

Technology
235 140 5.3k
  • 100R — working offgrid efficiently

    Technology technology
    4
    30 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    M
    Love 100 rabbits! They have some very interesting projects and articles.
  • Medical AI Systems Are Moving Too Fast for Safety Rules

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    47 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    79 Aufrufe
    T
    We're not just doing this for money. We're doing it for a SHITLOAD of money!
  • Breakfast Cereals Market expected to reach USD 104.07 billion by 2032

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Grok, Elon Musk's AI chatbot, seems to get right-wing update

    Technology technology
    13
    1
    184 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    138 Aufrufe
    A
    Yep. Pretty sure that was deliberate on Musk's (or his cronies) part. Imagine working at X and being told by your boss "I'd like you to make the bot more racist please." "Can you convince it that conspiracy theories are real?"
  • 1 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    X
    How many times is this putz going to post this article under new titles before they are banned?
  • A Tech-Backed Influencer Wants to Replace Teachers With AI

    Technology technology
    32
    1
    114 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    257 Aufrufe
    sturgist@lemmy.caS
    Heck yeah! Gotta watch that again, thank you kind stranger!
  • 27 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    60 Aufrufe
    A
    it's only meant for temporary situations, 10 total days per year. I guess the idea is you'd use loaner PCs to access this while getting repairs done or before you've gotten a new PC. but yeah i kinda doubt there's a huge market for this kind of service.
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    375 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.