Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp
-
signal requires a phone number and won't even allow you to send sms to those that aren't on signal.
its better, but still not great.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 17:30 zuletzt editiert vonIf you need to send sms to someone not on signal, why not just send them an sms
-
Because people are beyond stupid. "i dont want to download another app" - while having an app for almost every other store and bullshit game and whatever
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 18:20 zuletzt editiert vonI think what they really mean is "I don't want another account".
-
Jami*
Matrix isn’t necessarily p2p
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 18:41 zuletzt editiert vonOh yes that too
-
I think what they really mean is "I don't want another account".
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 18:45 zuletzt editiert vonHell I've been getting rid of accounts lately. Feels good.
-
There is threema, a Swiss messenger that gained some popularity earlier since they had end to end encryption before whatsapp.
Unfortunately the source code is not open (even though they do get annual audits with public reports), and the client costs 3 EUR or something (once).
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 19:32 zuletzt editiert vonUntil Facebook buys them like they did with WhatsApp...?
-
Tell me you don't know anything about security without telling me you don't know anything about security.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 19:55 zuletzt editiert vonI guess that sucks because I make a living working in cyber security. What do I know, amirite?
-
signal not being on fdroid is a strike against them
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 21:00 zuletzt editiert von cubitoom@infosec.pubYou can always install a release of any Android APK from a git repo using Obtainium .
-
If you need to send sms to someone not on signal, why not just send them an sms
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 21:36 zuletzt editiert vonif they need my phone number to have an account anyway, they can offer both.
i dont need more apps that do the same thing. i need less.
-
if they need my phone number to have an account anyway, they can offer both.
i dont need more apps that do the same thing. i need less.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 21:52 zuletzt editiert vonIt's arguably a very bad idea for a secure messenger to also provide an SMS interface, since those are basically cleartext
-
It's arguably a very bad idea for a secure messenger to also provide an SMS interface, since those are basically cleartext
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 21:57 zuletzt editiert von nima@leminal.spaceexactly. so I'm wondering what the purpose is for its need.
(edit: apologies- the phone number. needing the phone number.)
-
Anyone using Session? I finally got most of my friends and family on Signal so I'm not gonna switch but I just heard about it, seems pretty good.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 22:04 zuletzt editiert vonThe only thing I don't like about Session is, it runs on a underlying crypto token, incentivizing the network to keep on going. https://getsession.org/blog/migrating-from-the-oxen-network-to-session-network imo
-
Hell I've been getting rid of accounts lately. Feels good.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 22:12 zuletzt editiert vonIt's super cathartic, I agree. Feels extra good when it's big tech and fascist-owned as well.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 22:23 zuletzt editiert von
The exit plan from WhatsApp is quite simple. Start by installing Signal and setting it up – it takes only a couple of minutes. Then, resume any WhatsApp conversations on Signal if that person is already a Signal user. If they are not, then switch to regular text messaging and gently suggest to that person to switch over to Signal.
Sadly for me, this doesn't really work for some relatives as
- They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant
- Some are so tech un-savvy that even installing a new app by themselves is too much.
All I can do for those relatives is to leave WhatsApp installed but take away basically every permission I can, including running in the background.
-
That’s not even what it is lol.
And as the other commenter alluded to, defaults matter. You’re not replacing the thing everyone is already using by pitching “here’s an alternative that is better in ways which don’t affect your usage at all, and also you have to dig into the settings to turn off the optional daily popups”
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 22:40 zuletzt editiert vonYeah someone who cares enough about security to switch to Signal in the first place will be willing to go into the settings to get everything just the way they like it, but everybody else will only keep the app if it doesn't bug them.
-
The exit plan from WhatsApp is quite simple. Start by installing Signal and setting it up – it takes only a couple of minutes. Then, resume any WhatsApp conversations on Signal if that person is already a Signal user. If they are not, then switch to regular text messaging and gently suggest to that person to switch over to Signal.
Sadly for me, this doesn't really work for some relatives as
- They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant
- Some are so tech un-savvy that even installing a new app by themselves is too much.
All I can do for those relatives is to leave WhatsApp installed but take away basically every permission I can, including running in the background.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 22:45 zuletzt editiert vonThey live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant
Signal is free just like whats app. For text, calls, and video. So that isn't a problem.
I too have friends and family in different countries, one of which is crazy about whatsapp. I simply tell them this is how we are going to do things now, and walk them through it. It is not hard. If they can't do it, well then we don't need to communicate this way. Whatsapp is not an option. It is that simple.
-
exactly. so I'm wondering what the purpose is for its need.
(edit: apologies- the phone number. needing the phone number.)
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 22:56 zuletzt editiert von foobarrington@lemmy.worldWhat? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn't make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).
Edit: oh, you're probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.
-
Tell me you don't know anything about security without telling me you don't know anything about security.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 23:14 zuletzt editiert vonCould you explain a bit? I see main issue with Signal (though I'm not an expert, and they're not strictly related to security): it's centralized (and the server isn't even open-source).
The question is also a lot about your threat model right?
-
What? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn't make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).
Edit: oh, you're probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 23:18 zuletzt editiert vonusing the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.
there's no real need for it any longer.
-
using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.
there's no real need for it any longer.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 23:31 zuletzt editiert vonDo you have a better approach to prevent spam in mind? Without a barrier of entry it becomes a serious issue.
-
They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant
Signal is free just like whats app. For text, calls, and video. So that isn't a problem.
I too have friends and family in different countries, one of which is crazy about whatsapp. I simply tell them this is how we are going to do things now, and walk them through it. It is not hard. If they can't do it, well then we don't need to communicate this way. Whatsapp is not an option. It is that simple.
schrieb am 21. Juni 2025, 23:32 zuletzt editiert vonSignal is not capable of SMS and quite a lot of people still use it.
yes, i know SMS isn't secure at all. but if the option is "keep in touch with close family" or "don't keep in touch" they will probably choose the former if they want to keep that.
-
-
eSIM Vulnerability in Kigen's eUICC Cards Exposes Billions of IoT Devices to Malicious Attacks
Technology235 vor 29 Tagen14. Juli 2025, 12:271
-
The Ascendance Of Algorithmic Tyranny: As today’s platforms become all-powerful, the metaphors we use to describe our digitally infused world exemplify a new, stealthier domination that is emerging.
Technology 2. Juli 2025, 02:341
-
Google Releases an Open Source AI Model for Live Music Creation, Magenta RealTime.
Technology 21. Juni 2025, 18:021
-
-
-
Spread of sexual deepfake images created by generative AI growing in Japan
Technology 29. Mai 2025, 15:241
-
Microsoft rolls Windows Recall out to the public nearly a year after announcing it
Technology 25. Apr. 2025, 22:451