Honda successfully launched and landed its own reusable rocket
-
It seems crazy that a company that's only really known for cars, motorbikes, tuning forks, heat pumps, brake pads, pens, tractors, fertilizer, display panels, outboard motors, pneumatic systems, oil tankers, furniture, locomotives, bricks, solar panels, ATVs, generators, hot air balloons, dinghies, hydrogen fuel cells, submarines, crop dusters, jet engines, cultivators, hedge trimmers, lawnmowers, precision optics and robots would suddenly pivot to rockets.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 04:36 zuletzt editiert vonTo be fair to Honda, they are doing what is expected of any companies in a capitalist system, actually innovate and diversify in order to remain competitive. Most other companies would rather stick to their traditional products and services, even if those products and services are written on the wall that they are becoming obsolete.
-
What the F is every corporation's boner with rockets?
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 04:39 zuletzt editiert vonBecause the last stage of existence on this planet. Will be febel plans to try and colonize other planets. Because our planet will start to poison us as a defensive mechanism. All of these Corporations need a plan to get off planet.
-
Because the last stage of existence on this planet. Will be febel plans to try and colonize other planets. Because our planet will start to poison us as a defensive mechanism. All of these Corporations need a plan to get off planet.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 05:54 zuletzt editiert vonFeeble? But I think you meant futile? Idk.
-
An alternative to.space junk clogging up the sky would indeed be nice.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:20 zuletzt editiert vonIt sounds like he's asking for more space junk.
-
I wonder if hydrogen fuels poses any unique risks as compared to petrol.
It's highly explosive.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:20 zuletzt editiert vonIs petrol not?
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:31 zuletzt editiert von
Idk, looks more like Hitachi
-
Is petrol not?
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:44 zuletzt editiert vonIn different ways. For example, it's very rare for a car to explode in a collision, other than in movies.
One of the reasons that make hydrogen difficult to work with in this sense is that hydrogen (H₂) molecules are so small that they can permeate most materials, such as steel. Then it can get somewhat easily to wherever there is a spark, and chaos ensues. Annoyingly you don't even need 100% Hydrogen for that to happen, as it can ignite with a concentration of just 4%.
After we stopped using Hydrogen mostly as a consequence of Hindenburg's accident, it's taken years to perfect hydrogen fuel cells to a safety standard that can be used in cars. As far as I know, its use has been limited to rockets/space propulsion otherwise (where you can just throw millions at the problem to make it safer).
-
Guess we doin rockets now
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:47 zuletzt editiert vonWe got Honda launching rockets before GTA 6
-
I wonder if hydrogen fuels poses any unique risks as compared to petrol.
It's highly explosive.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:49 zuletzt editiert vonIt’s highly explosive
That's ... why i'm here
-
In different ways. For example, it's very rare for a car to explode in a collision, other than in movies.
One of the reasons that make hydrogen difficult to work with in this sense is that hydrogen (H₂) molecules are so small that they can permeate most materials, such as steel. Then it can get somewhat easily to wherever there is a spark, and chaos ensues. Annoyingly you don't even need 100% Hydrogen for that to happen, as it can ignite with a concentration of just 4%.
After we stopped using Hydrogen mostly as a consequence of Hindenburg's accident, it's taken years to perfect hydrogen fuel cells to a safety standard that can be used in cars. As far as I know, its use has been limited to rockets/space propulsion otherwise (where you can just throw millions at the problem to make it safer).
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:51 zuletzt editiert von(H₂) molecules are so small that they can permeate most materials, such as steel
Okay, I knew from texts books that H2 is small but I never thought of the real-life consequences of it being so small. Then theoretically, Helium should also be "leaky", right?
-
Because the last stage of existence on this planet. Will be febel plans to try and colonize other planets. Because our planet will start to poison us as a defensive mechanism. All of these Corporations need a plan to get off planet.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 06:58 zuletzt editiert vonIt would take a lot to make Mars more habitable than Earth. This isn't about colonisation this is simply that it's cool to build rockets.
-
It would take a lot to make Mars more habitable than Earth. This isn't about colonisation this is simply that it's cool to build rockets.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 07:09 zuletzt editiert vonYeah, it's easier to terraform ... Planet Earth!
-
I hope they crush SpaceX one day.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 07:10 zuletzt editiert vonBy landing on them.
-
(H₂) molecules are so small that they can permeate most materials, such as steel
Okay, I knew from texts books that H2 is small but I never thought of the real-life consequences of it being so small. Then theoretically, Helium should also be "leaky", right?
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 07:17 zuletzt editiert vonYep, helium is even worse for leaking! It's actually the smallest noble gas and can escape through tiny pores that even hydrogen can't fit through. Thats why helium balloons deflate faster than air balloons - the atoms literally seep through the balloon material.
-
Idk, looks more like Hitachi
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 07:53 zuletzt editiert vonNot just for hard drives anymore.
-
An alternative to starlink would be great.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 07:54 zuletzt editiert von endlessnightmare@reddthat.comAn alternative to anything related to Elon would be great.
-
Because the last stage of existence on this planet. Will be febel plans to try and colonize other planets. Because our planet will start to poison us as a defensive mechanism. All of these Corporations need a plan to get off planet.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 07:54 zuletzt editiert vonYes, let spend money to fuck up other planets as well instead of saving this one. /s
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 08:01 zuletzt editiert von
Genuinely curious: how many explosions before the successful test?
-
Don't forget, one the sleekest airplanes to ever exist.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 08:03 zuletzt editiert vonN420HA. Not sure if that's the model or the plane's license plate but either way hell yeah
-
Yep, helium is even worse for leaking! It's actually the smallest noble gas and can escape through tiny pores that even hydrogen can't fit through. Thats why helium balloons deflate faster than air balloons - the atoms literally seep through the balloon material.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 08:05 zuletzt editiert vonHow does Helium fit through places that Hydrogen can't even though its bigger? Is it because Hydrogen would react with things along the way while Helium won't?
-
As Gaza suffers, US companies are reaping horrific payoffs | Katrina vanden Heuvel
Technology170 vor 10 Tagenvor 11 Tagen1
-
Trump’s war on windmills started in Scotland. Now he’s taking it global
Technology170 vor 20 Tagenvor 22 Tagen1
-
Reddit executive Roxy Young is departing the social media company
Technology170 vor 24 Tagenvor 24 Tagen1
-
1
-
With a Trump-driven reduction of nearly 2,000 employees, F.D.A. will Use A.I. in Drug Approvals to ‘Radically Increase Efficiency’
Technology 11. Juni 2025, 15:241
-
-
-
Feds Warn SMS Authentication Is Unsafe After ‘Worst Hack in Our Nation’s History’
Technology 20. Dez. 2024, 01:191