‘FuckLAPD.com’ Lets Anyone Use Facial Recognition to Instantly Identify Cops
-
Cameras. They fucking hate body cameras. When it clears them of wrongdoing, they have the video ready. When they 'accidentally' shoot a guy nine times in the back of the head, video seems to be missing.
schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 23:47 zuletzt editiert von pyre@lemmy.worldeasily solvable problem: losing the footage is indication of guilt. you shoot someone, you better have it ready. it malfunctioned, better have a partner who has theirs ready. if no one has footage to clear you, it's used as evidence of guilt.
of course pussy ass lawmakers will never do that.
-
They know what they're doing is wrong
Is that why the protestors wear them too?
schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 23:47 zuletzt editiert vonProtestors or vandals and rioters?
The former: to prevent government persecution and unfair retaliation. The latter: yes.
-
Protestors or vandals and rioters?
The former: to prevent government persecution and unfair retaliation. The latter: yes.
schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 23:52 zuletzt editiert vonProtestors or vandals and rioters?
Yes.
The former: to prevent government persecution and unfair retaliation.
Why would they face persecution if they did nothing wrong!?
-
Protestors or vandals and rioters?
Yes.
The former: to prevent government persecution and unfair retaliation.
Why would they face persecution if they did nothing wrong!?
schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 23:57 zuletzt editiert vonThe government has always had it out for protestors, to the extent that they'll try and use agents provocateur to escalate the situation. They don't want people to protest, they just want people to life back and take it. C'mon, you seriously asking this?
-
The government has always had it out for protestors, to the extent that they'll try and use agents provocateur to escalate the situation. They don't want people to protest, they just want people to life back and take it. C'mon, you seriously asking this?
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:00 zuletzt editiert von ulrich@feddit.orgThe point I'm trying to make is that everyone is wearing a mask for the same reason: to prevent retribution for their beliefs and according actions.
They don't "know what they're doing is wrong", they just know that other people think that and will target them for it, which is the exact same reason protestors wear them.
-
If only CSI enhancing worked in real life, we could out the asshole on the far left.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:23 zuletzt editiert von deathbybigsad@sh.itjust.worksdeleted by creator
-
easily solvable problem: losing the footage is indication of guilt. you shoot someone, you better have it ready. it malfunctioned, better have a partner who has theirs ready. if no one has footage to clear you, it's used as evidence of guilt.
of course pussy ass lawmakers will never do that.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:30 zuletzt editiert vonI believe having lack of evidence being the evidence for a crime is problematic, but it sure is evidence enough that they aren't fit for their job and they should immediately lose it. Everyone Including the supervisor who failed to run the team properly.
-
Lmao let's see how long it takes them to shut this down
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:43 zuletzt editiert von -
The point I'm trying to make is that everyone is wearing a mask for the same reason: to prevent retribution for their beliefs and according actions.
They don't "know what they're doing is wrong", they just know that other people think that and will target them for it, which is the exact same reason protestors wear them.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:45 zuletzt editiert vonThere's a difference between wearing a mask because you are engaging in wrongdoing and wearing a mask to prevent unjust retaliation. Even if the actual motive is the same, the implications are very different
-
There's a difference between wearing a mask because you are engaging in wrongdoing and wearing a mask to prevent unjust retaliation. Even if the actual motive is the same, the implications are very different
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:47 zuletzt editiert von ulrich@feddit.orgThe only difference is what you consider to be "wrong" or "just".
-
The only difference is what you consider to be "wrong" or "just".
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:50 zuletzt editiert von endlessnightmare@reddthat.comI am not the arbiter of what is/isn't wrong, but there are some general consensus among the public as well as pertinent legal frameworks.
-
Non-Anglo here.
Totally not distracted bcs my brain autocorrected it to “all of a sudden” without even noticing.
A bit like "It deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are"
Also never seen/heard the "the" variant. (Well consciously that is).schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:50 zuletzt editiert vonDoes not have to be Before Christ.
-
"All of the sudden" is only valid because it's so commonly (incorrectly) used. Much as it annoys me, that's just how language works.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:51 zuletzt editiert vonOnly if you allow the ignorant to remain uncorrected.
-
It's just you. There were mass protests across the country just a couple of weeks ago.
Unless you meant the senseless destruction of property.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:52 zuletzt editiert vonMass protests where people did nothing in particular. That is, in fact, not resistance. People in LA are actually making it harder for ICE to terrorize them.
-
The point I'm trying to make is that everyone is wearing a mask for the same reason: to prevent retribution for their beliefs and according actions.
They don't "know what they're doing is wrong", they just know that other people think that and will target them for it, which is the exact same reason protestors wear them.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 00:58 zuletzt editiert vonSome beliefs require retribution. Some causes are righteous. Fuck off with your false equivalencies. Rioters aren’t employed by the people- law enforcement is.
-
I am not the arbiter of what is/isn't wrong, but there are some general consensus among the public as well as pertinent legal frameworks.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 01:08 zuletzt editiert vonI am not the arbiter of what is/isn't wrong
That's what you're doing though
-
There's a reason ICE conceal their faces.
They know what they're doing is wrong and don't want to be held accountable if their fascist rule collapses.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 01:08 zuletzt editiert vonSo which cameras can be used to overcome normal face coverings? https://piped.video/watch?v=yRFeS72IM6M
-
Some beliefs require retribution. Some causes are righteous. Fuck off with your false equivalencies. Rioters aren’t employed by the people- law enforcement is.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 01:09 zuletzt editiert vonFuck you too buddy
-
Fuck you too buddy
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 01:19 zuletzt editiert vonI hope you get everything you deserve.
-
I hope you get everything you deserve.
schrieb am 25. Juni 2025, 01:35 zuletzt editiert vonThank you
-
The Johns Hopkins University Press will license its authors' books to train AI models, citing concerns that “the window may be closing” for making AI deals
Technology214 vor 16 Tagenvor 16 Tagen1
-
-
-
Google is launching Offerwall, A new tool for publishers/websites to paywall their content.
Technology 26. Juni 2025, 16:301
-
Microsoft Gives European Union Users More Control: Uninstall Edge, Store, and Say Goodbye to Bing Prompts
Technology 3. Juni 2025, 09:311
-
This new 40TB hard drive from Seagate is just the beginning—50TB is coming fast!
Technology 2. Juni 2025, 12:121
-
-
Brian Eno: “The biggest problem about AI is not intrinsic to AI. It’s to do with the fact that it’s owned by the same few people”
Technology 23. März 2025, 13:071