Skip to content

Study: Remote working benefits fathers while childless men miss sense of community

Technology
170 113 1.6k
  • 166 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    460 Aufrufe
    P
    Seems more like someone got confused and dumped info for chicken pox instead of “chicken pops”
  • 314 Stimmen
    141 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    zacryon@feddit.orgZ
    I see. If moving to another country, where you don't have to suffer such conditions, is also not an option then I hope you're looking for something else while you're at your current job. These are no conditions anyone should suffer.
  • 172 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    169 Aufrufe
    P
    That is still beyond extremely optimistic
  • 363 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    A
    No I don't think there really were many so your point is valid But the law works like that, things are in a grey area or in limbo until they are defined into law. That means the new law can be written to either protect consumer privacy, or make it legal to the letter to rape consumer privacy like this bill, or some weird inbetween where some shady stuff is still explicitly allowed but in general consumers are protected in specific ways from specific privacy abuses This bill being the second option is bad because typically when laws are written it then takes a loooong time to reverse them
  • 79 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    D
    Right? The surprise would be if they weren't doing that.
  • Right to Repair Gains Traction as John Deere Faces Trial

    Technology technology
    30
    1
    621 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    393 Aufrufe
    R
    Run the Jewels?
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    362 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • AI and misinformation

    Technology technology
    3
    20 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    D
    Don’t lose hope, just pretend to with sarcasm. Or if you are feeling down it could work the other way too. https://aibusiness.com/nlp/sarcasm-is-really-really-really-easy-for-ai-to-handle#close-modal