Skip to content

Google confirms more ads on your paid YouTube Premium Lite soon

Technology
273 192 3.0k
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 24 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    96 Aufrufe
    I
    They want to become the new tax collectors. They want to buy our toy democracy
  • Convert YouTube Videos to Text Instantly

    Technology technology
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    554 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • 98 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    108 Aufrufe
    K
    This guy wasn't born yesterday.
  • Is Google about to destroy the web?

    Technology technology
    65
    1
    192 Stimmen
    65 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    S
    Or validating source, making sure it isn't AI content which usually regurgitates the same talking points. Homogenizing the entire query and removing actual information variance of personal experience.
  • 202 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    141 Aufrufe
    A
    If you are taking business advice from ChatGPT that includes purchasing a ChatGPT subscription or can’t be bothered to look up how it works beforehand then your business is probably going to fail.
  • Covert Web-to-App Tracking via Localhost on Android

    Technology technology
    2
    43 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    M
    Thanks for sharing this, it is an interesting read (though an additional comment about what this about would have been helpful). I want to say I am glad I do not use either of these services but Yandex implementation seems so bad that it does not matter, as any app could receive their data