@phenomlab would this apply when using Gmail as the sending provider? I suppose it could if you were sending in a different from...

@jnv@fosstodon.org it really does pick up towards the end!

@emperor@feddit.uk it is! The in-development stuff I'm working on makes it much easier to post directly to a Lemmy community. This is probably the first, yes. It was also a bit of a live test at the same time.

A note that the ForumWG meeting is scheduled to begin shortly: https://meet.jit.si/ap-forum-wg

@thisismissem@hachyderm.io ah understood. I didn't quite get how the fund worked, but it makes more sense now (and is much simpler—organizationally—for Nivenly!) I don't think we'll add exclusions for security fund recipients I would say, though, that one of the requirements has to be that the affected software accepts the vulnerability. Plenty of self-proclaimed "security researchers" have filed reports, and some go as far as to publish CVEs (against our own software!) without our permission. Quite the opposite of responsible disclosure.

Let's clarify something here. Mastodon follower only posts don't have the "public pseudo user" addressed, do they? That's the important piece that this whole thing hinges upon If it is present, Mastodon is a fault. If not, Pixelfed messed up. No?

@AltCode all three flipboard remote categories seem to be working now