Skip to content

You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

Technology
298 182 3.7k
  • 10 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    P
    This has nothing to do with training a GPT or model. It’s a point form guide to using the Custom GPT feature in the ChatGPT app. It’s really mostly just “write a prompt and upload pdfs”
  • DIY cyborg (Nerdforge)

    Technology technology
    1
    22 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Robot Hand Could Harvest Blackberries Better Than Humans

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    55 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    intheflsun@lemmy.worldI
    I mean when I'm picking them, like 65% end up being eaten, 35% end up in the basket. I don't imagine the clankers would eat that much.
  • Using Clouds for too long might have made you incompetent

    Technology technology
    87
    166 Stimmen
    87 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    M
    I was recruited as an R&D engineer by a company that was sales focused. It was pretty funny being recruited like a new sales hire: limo from the airport, etc. Limo driver didn't work direct for the company but she did a lot of work for them, it was an hour drive both ways to/from the "big" airport they used. She said most of the sales recruits she drove in were clueless kids, no idea how the world worked yet at all - gunning for a big commission job where 9/10 hires wash out within a year. At least after I arrived on-site I spent the day with my prospective new department, that was a pretty decent process. The one guy I didn't interview well with turned out to be the guy who had applied to the spot I was taking and had been passed over. As I was walking in on my first day he was just finishing moving his stuff out of the window-office desk he was giving up for me, into a cube. I can understand why he was a little prickly.
  • 138 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    124 Aufrufe
    toastedravioli@midwest.socialT
    ChatGPT is not a doctor. But models trained on imaging can actually be a very useful tool for them to utilize. Even years ago, just before the AI “boom”, they were asking doctors for details on how they examine patient images and then training models on that. They found that the AI was “better” than doctors specifically because it followed the doctor’s advice 100% of the time; thereby eliminating any kind of bias from the doctor that might interfere with following their own training. Of course, the splashy headline “AI better than doctors” was ridiculous. But it does show the benefit of having a neutral tool for doctors to utilize, especially when looking at images for people who are outside of the typical demographics that much medical training is based on. (As in mostly just white men. For example, everything they train doctors on regarding knee imagining comes from images of the knees of coal miners in the UK some decades ago)
  • 775 Stimmen
    396 Beiträge
    16k Aufrufe
    52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org5
    You are more than welcome to cite the actual Geneva convention to show where I'm wrong.
  • Climate science

    Technology technology
    12
    2
    138 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    137 Aufrufe
    Z
    What is the connection to technology here?
  • 8 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    60 Aufrufe
    reverendender@sh.itjust.worksR
    I read the article. This is what the “debate” is: Experts: This is objectively horrible, and does not replace human interaction, and is probably harmful. Meta: This is awesome and therapeutic. Now give us monies!