Skip to content

You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

Technology
298 182 3.6k

208/298

26. Juni 2025, 03:32


  • 218 Stimmen
    54 Beiträge
    340 Aufrufe
    How difficult would it be to mirror most popular youtube channels to peertube if instance operators picked a few channels each and kept them updated?
  • 333 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    432 Aufrufe
    Unfortunately, they thought of that. Some of them are known answers that they use to be sure you're answering honestly. They'll fail you on those even though they know you're not a bot.
  • DIY experimental Redox Flow Battery kit

    Technology technology vor 24 Tagen
    1
    37 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    The roadmap defines 3 milestone batteries. The first is released, it's a benchtop device that you can relatively easily build on your own. It has an electrode side of 2 x 2cm2. It does not store any significant amount of energy. The second one is being developed right now, it has a cell the size of a small 3d printer bed (20x20cm) and will also not store practical amounts of energy. It will hopefully prove though that they are on the right track and that they can scale it up. The third battery only will store significant amounts of energy but in only due end of the year (probably later). Current Vanadium systems cost approx. 300-600$/kWh according to some random website I found. The goal of this project is to spread the knowledge about Redox Flow Batteries and in the medium term only make them commercially viable. The aniolyth and catholyth are based on the Zink-Iodine system in an aqueous solution. There are a bunch of other systems though, each with their trade offs. The anode and cathode are both graphite felt in the case of the dev kit.
  • 7 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    60 Aufrufe
    VC-backed OpenAI is the most valuable company in the world and is engaging in massive environmental destruction. The US state just went into cahoots with them to the tune of billions VC-backed Uber and AirBnb disrupted multiple estabilished industries for the worst by undercutting them through loss-leading. VC-backed Facebook killed or purchased all its rivals and consolidated almost all social media to the detriment of the whole world.
  • 461 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 8 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 30 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    71 Aufrufe
    The thing about compelling lies is not that they are new, just that they are easier to expand. The most common effect of compelling lies is their ability to get well-intentioned people to support malign causes and give their money to fraudsters. So, expect that to expand, kind of like it already has been. The big question for me is what the response will be. Will we make lying illegal? Will we become a world of ever more paranoid isolationists, returning to clans, families, households, as the largest social group you can trust? Will most people even have the intelligence to see what is happenning and respond? Or will most people be turned into info-puppets, controlled into behaviours by manipulation of their information diet to an unprecedented degree? I don't know.
  • 1 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    135 Aufrufe
    ...is this some sort of joke my Nordic brain can't understand? I need to go hug a councilman.