Skip to content

Amazon is considering shoving ads into Alexa+ conversations

Technology
88 65 5
  • X Stuck Paying Fees to Arbitrate With Laid Off Twitter Workers

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    25 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    E
    X Stuck Paying Fees to Arbitrate With Laid Off X Workers
  • UK Plans AI Experiment on Children Seeking Asylum

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    74 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    R
    Exactly, it's a tool to whitewash decisions. A machine that seemingly does not exactly what it should do. A way to shake off responsibility. And that it won't ever work right is its best trait for this purpose. They'll be able to blame every transgression or wrong where they are caught on an error in the system, and get away with the rest. At least unless it's legally equated to using Tarot cards for making decisions affecting lives. That should disqualify the fiend further as a completely inadequate human being, not absolve them of responsibility.
  • EU age verification app to ban any Android system not licensed by Google

    Technology technology
    124
    538 Stimmen
    124 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    arararagi@ani.socialA
    At least in the UK it has been the Labor party doing it, they all want control.
  • I want to know!

    Technology technology
    6
    4 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    71 Aufrufe
    reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.comR
    !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev !ergomechkeyboards@lemmy.world !splitmechkeyboards@lemmy.world and maybe !keychron@lemmy.ca These would be much more appropriate for your post. Also, have a proper post title and question when you post there.
  • AI Pressure from the Top: CEOs Urge Workers to Adapt

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    528 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Where do I install this nvme drive on my laptop?

    Technology technology
    19
    2
    18 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    164 Aufrufe
    K
    ??? The thing is on the right side of the pic. Your image is up side down. Edit: oh.duh, the two horizontal slots. I'm a dummy. Sorry.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet