Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. The Arc Browser Is Dead

The Arc Browser Is Dead

Technology
83 52 0
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldJ

    Palantir Exposed: The New Deep State [27:27 | JUN 10 2025 | Glenn Greenwald]

    Technology technology
    6
    30 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    B
    I would also like to say, fuck Glenn Greenwald. And here is a better source on why fuck Palantir: Behind The Bastards
  • T

    BlackRock’s Bitcoin Scheme: How Wall Street Giants Are Bilking Poor People Out of Money

    Technology technology
    7
    72 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    F
    I think the issue is people started buying etf instead of using Bitcoin themselves. Bitcoin as such has no value at all, it's only valuable if people use it for transactions.
  • P

    Building a slow web

    Technology technology
    37
    1
    173 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    I
    Realistically, you don't need security, NAT alone is enough since the packets have nowhere to go without port forwarding. But IF you really want to build front end security here is my plan. ISP bridge -> WAN port of openwrt capable router with DSA supported switch (that is almost all of them) Set all ports of the switch to VLAN mirroring mode bridge WAN and LAN sides Fail2Ban IP block list in the bridge LAN PORT 1 toward -> OpenWRT running inside Proxmox LXC (NAT lives here) -> top of rack switch LAN PORT 2 toward -> Snort IDS LAN PORT 3 toward -> combined honeypot and traffic analyzer Port 2&3 detect malicious internet hosts and add them to the block list (and then multiple other openwrt LXCs running many many VPN ports as alternative gateways, I switch LAN host's internet address by changing their default gateway) I run no internal VLAN, all one LAN because convenience is more important than security in my case.
  • E

    True Wireless Power is FINALLY here (building a TRULY wire-free desk setup)

    Technology technology diy wireless
    84
    110 Stimmen
    84 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    T
    It's not new technology you numpty. It's not news. It's not a scientific paper. Wireless energy transfer isn't "bullshit", it's been an understood aspect of physics for a long time. Since you seem unable to grasp the concept, I'll put it in bold and italics: This is a video of a guy doing a DIY project where he wanted to make his setup as wireless as possible. In the video he also goes over his thoughts and design considerations, and explains how the tech works for people who don't already know. It is not new technology. It is not pseudoscience. It is a guy showing off his bespoke PC setup. It does not need an article or a blog post. He can post about it in any form he wants. Personally, I think showcasing this kind of thing in a video is much better than a wall of text. I want to see the process, the finished product, the tools used and how he used them.
  • A

    My AI Skeptic Friends Are All Nuts

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    12 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    J
    I did read it, and my comment is exactly referencing the attitude of the author which is "It's good enough, so you should use it". I disagree, and say it's another dumbass shortcut to cash grab on a less than stellar ecosystem and product. It's training wheels for failure.
  • P

    Digg founder Kevin Rose offers to buy Pocket from Mozilla

    Technology technology
    7
    2
    1 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    H
    IMO it was already shitty.
  • moonleay@feddit.orgM

    U.S. inks bill to force geo-tracking tech for high-end gaming and AI GPUs

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    2 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    fisch@discuss.tchncs.deF
    If I went to the USA now, they'd probably put me there after looking at my social media activity anyway
  • F

    [Opinion] Unending ransomware attacks are a symptom, not the sickness

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    44 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    G
    It varies based on local legislation, so in some places paying ransoms is banned but it's by no means universal. It's totally valid to be against paying ransoms wherever possible, but it's not entirely black and white in some situations. For example, what if a hospital gets ransomed? Say they serve an area not served by other facilities, and if they can't get back online quickly people will die? Sounds dramatic, but critical public services get ransomed all the time and there are undeniable real world consequences. Recovery from ransomware can cost significantly more than a ransom payment if you're not prepared. It can also take months to years to recover, especially if you're simultaneously fighting to evict a persistent (annoyed, unpaid) threat actor from your environment. For the record I don't think ransoms should be paid in most scenarios, but I do think there is some nuance to consider here.